You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.

Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Search results

3387 items matching your search terms

  1. [2023] NZEmpC 193 Le Gros v Fonterra Cooperative Group Ltd [PDF, 284 KB]

    [2023] NZEmpC 193 Le Gros v Fonterra Cooperative Group Ltd (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 8 November 2023) INTERPRETATION OF COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT - LONG SERVICE LEAVE - employee joined collective agreement after 15th anniversary date - whether employee is entitled to long service leave - employee is entitled to long service leave after 15 years continual service, regardless of whether they were covered on anniversary date.

  2. [2023] NZEmpC 191 Appleton v Tasman Cargo Airlines Pty Ltd [PDF, 311 KB]

    [2023] NZEmpC 191 Appleton v Tasman Cargo Airlines Pty Ltd (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 3 November 2023) PERSONAL GRIEVANCE – UNJUSTIFIABLE DISMISSAL – investigation process was flawed – dismissal was unjustifiable – REMEDIES – employee contributed to dismissal by health and safety breach – remedies reduced by 20% for contribution reinstatement not practicable or reasonable – compensation and lost wages awarded with reduction.

  3. [2023] NZEmpC 189 Pretorius v Board of Trustees of Taupo Intermediate School [PDF, 285 KB]

    [2023] NZEmpC 189 Pretorius v Board of Trustees of Taupo Intermediate School (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 3 November 2023) APPLICATION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS – reason to believe plaintiff would not be able to pay an award of costs – possibility that challenge would be prevented considered – modest security for costs ordered – APPLICATION FOR STAY OF AUTHORITY COSTS DETERMINATION – no basis for stay – application declined.

  4. [2023] NZEmpC 180 HelloWorld Travel Services (NZ) Ltd v Unsworth [PDF, 350 KB]

    [2023] NZEmpC 180 HelloWorld Travel Services (NZ) Ltd v Unsworth (Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 25 October 2023) UNJUSTIFIABLE DISMISSAL – REDUNDANCY – NON-DE NOVO CHALLENGE - Authority was correct in finding that redundancy process was unfair and decision was predetermined – flaws were not minor or inconsequential – dismissal was unjustifiable – redundancy compensation did not impact appropriate remedies - Authority did not make error in determination of remedies.

  5. [2023] NZEmpC 179 Pyne v Invacare New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 255 KB]

    [2023] NZEmpC 179 Pyne v Invacare New Zealand Ltd (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 25 October 2023) NON-DE NOVO CHALLENGE - REMEDIES - employee was unemployed for a significant period despite attempts at mitigation - 6 months' lost wages awarded - Authority's compensation award insufficiently explained - banding approach applied – - no reduction made for contribution – recommendation does not need to be made - PENALTY FOR BREACH OF GOOD FAITH – egregious bad faith is not required to award a penalty for breach of good faith – breach by the company was intended to undermine the employment relationship - $6,000 penalty awarded.

  6. [2023] NZEmpC 173 Pact Group v Robinson [PDF, 334 KB]

    [2023] NZEmpC 173 Pact Group v Robinson (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 5 October 2023) UNJUSTIFIABLE DISMISSAL – serious misconduct – GPS records relied upon in disciplinary process – employer failed to consider and engage with employee’s cultural concerns – higher standard for well-resourced employer – unfair disciplinary process and failings were not minor – not fair and reasonable to reach that conclusion – procedurally and substantively unjustified – lost wages and compensation for hurt and humiliation and lost benefit awarded.