Judgments of note 2018
From time to time the Court decides cases that have general importance for practitioners of employment law as well as for the particular parties. These will include some judgments of the full Court and others examining and applying new law.
Decisions of Note:
 NZEmpC 47 New Zealand Nurses Organisation v Waikato District Health Board [PDF, 366 KB] (Judgment of the full Court, 15 May 2018) CONTRACT INTERPRETATION – eligibility for retiring gratuity – meaning of “retirement from the organisation”– history of grandparenting clause examined – must be more than moving on – intention to retire from regular paid work – challenge unsuccessful.
 NZEmpC 45 Performance Cleaners All Property Services Wellington Ltd v Chinan [PDF, 427 KB] (Costs Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 11 May 2018) COSTS – challenge to costs determination - jurisdiction to award costs when the matter is outside jurisdiction – costs within jurisdiction – costs of $33,739 ordered plus disbursements.
 NZEmpC 43 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v Smiths City Group Ltd [PDF, 503 KB] (Judgment of the Full Court, 8 May 2018) COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM WAGE ACT – NATURE OF ‘WORK’ – COMMISSIONS - are pre-work meetings regarded as work for purposes of Minimum Wage Act? – tests in Idea Services applied – test of whether attendance “integral” to work – meetings are work – whether commissions included as part of assessment of hourly wage – not to be included.
 NZEmpC 40 Johnston v The Fletcher Construction Co Ltd [PDF, 262 KB] (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 4 May 2018) DIRECTION TO MEDIATION – PRIVATE MEDIATOR – whether jurisdiction of Court allows direction to private mediation – not accepted – parties directed to MBIE mediation.
 NZEmpC 33 Nisha Alim v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 289 KB] (Costs Judgment (No 2) of Judge B A Corkill, 18 April 2018) COSTS – whether successful party should be awarded costs with regard to advancing of the applications –costs on costs awards may be made – costs consequences of Calderbanks extend to parties joined to litigation but not to those not involved in some hearings – hearing costs broken down -percentage costs distributed between four parties.
 NZEmpC 26 A Labour Inspector v Victoria 88 Ltd t/a Watershed Bar and Restaurant [PDF, 484 KB] (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 26 March 2018) BREACH OF MINIMUM ENTITLEMENTS – PENALTIES – BANNING ORDER – consent of parties to orders – history of multiple proceedings surveyed – some mitigating factors - banning orders made – pecuniary penalties of $20,000 ordered, part to be paid to named individuals.
 NZEmpC 20 Smith v Director General of the Ministry for Primary Industries [PDF, 282 KB] (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 16 March 2018) UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – DISPARITY – relevant case law considered – dismissal process not unfair – no disparity of process or outcome – mitigating factors not present – decision to dismiss fair and reasonable.
 NZEmpC 19 Kumara Hotel Ltd v McSherry [PDF, 333 KB] (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 15 March 2018) UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – 90-DAY TRIAL PERIOD – unfair bargaining not found – defendant previously employed by virtue of first employment agreement – 90-day trial provision ineffective in subsequent agreement – unjustified dismissal found – lost wages and $11,900 compensation awarded.
 NZEmpC 16 Nathan v Broadspectrum (New Zealand) Ltd [PDF, 293 KB](Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 12 March 2018) BREACH OF COMPLIANCE ORDER – FINE – reinstatement – plaintiff rostered on training course prior to resuming active duties – technical breach of compliance order found – fine inappropriate.
 NZEmpC 8 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 1.4 MB] (Costs Judgment (No 1) of Judge B A Corkill, 23 February 2018) COSTS IN RELATION TO MULTIPLE JUDGMENTS – LIABILITY FOR COSTS - Calderbank offers unreasonably rejected – each of 19 interlocutory judgments dealt with separately – range from small costs in favour of plaintiff to indemnity costs in favour of defendant – other costs detailed – increased costs justified – adjustment for plaintiff’s modest success - GST not allowed for – total costs to defendant more than $198, 000– question of liability - plaintiff in person to pay $10,000 - non-party funding considered– personal liability of non-party as impropriety shown – joint and several liability found – costs in Authority to be paid by plaintiff personally - $10,500; non-party personally to pay $19, 164.89; funding parties to pay jointly and severally over $166,000.
This page was last updated: