S152 Lawyers and Conyeyancers Act 2006 / Standards Committee (or LCRO) may only lay charges of misconduct before New Zealand Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal / no jurisdiction to make finding of misconduct.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
2954 items matching your search terms
-
BM v YI LCRO 124 / 2010 (7 April 2011) [PDF, 96 KB] -
McClutchie-Morrell v Te Runanga o Ngati Porou (2011) 13 Tairawhiti MB 121 (13 TRW 121) [PDF, 129 KB] 04.04.2011 | Judge Clark | Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993, section 79 | Costs
-
BI v YP & Ors LCRO 115 / 2010 (4 April 2011) [PDF, 97 KB] Complaints about quality of services by lawyers not upheld. Standards Committee comment that lawyers could have communicated better led to review application and request for fees adjustment. Review issues included lack of courtesy and respect by lawyers. Standards Committee decision confirmed.
-
Overview Trustee Ltd as trustee of the Carrigafoyle Trust v Cook & Anor as trustees of the CC Trust [2011] NZWHT Auckland 19 [PDF, 66 KB] Overview Trustee Ltd as trustee of the Carrigafoyle Trust v Cook & Anor as trustees of the CC Trust [2011] NZWHT Auckland 19 summary TRI 2008-100-000023/DBH 5619. Decision date 25 March 2011. See also the Overview Trustee Ltd as trustee of the Carrigafoyle Trust v Cook & Anor as trustees of the CC Trust [2011] NZWHT Auckland 19 summary, Overview Trustee Ltd as trustee of the Carrigafoyle Trust v Cook & Anor as trustees of the CC Trust [2011] NZWHT Auckland 35 costs decision, and the High Court Overview Trustee Ltd as trustee of the Carrigafoyle Trust v Cook & Anor as trustees of the CC Trust [2011] NZWHT Auckland 35 costs appeal decision CIV-2011-404-04779.
-
Overview Trustee Ltd as trustee of the Carrigafoyle Trust v Cook & Anor as trustees of the CC Trust [2011] NZWHT Auckland 19 [PDF, 335 KB] Overview Trustee Ltd as trustee of the Carrigafoyle Trust v Cook & Anor as trustees of the CC Trust [2011] NZWHT Auckland 19 final determination TRI 2008-100-000023/DBH 5619. Decision date 25 March 2011. See also the Overview Trustee Ltd as trustee of the Carrigafoyle Trust v Cook & Anor as trustees of the CC Trust [2011] NZWHT Auckland 19 summary, Overview Trustee Ltd as trustee of the Carrigafoyle Trust v Cook & Anor as trustees of the CC Trust [2011] NZWHT Auckland 35 costs decision, and the High Court Overview Trustee Ltd as trustee of the Carrigafoyle Trust v Cook & Anor as trustees of the CC Trust [2011] NZWHT Auckland 35 costs appeal decision CIV-2011-404-004779.
-
AZ v YX LCRO 175 / 2010 (25 March 2011) [PDF, 146 KB] Estimate of fee - additional work required. Fee below $2,000 - regulation 29 / Complaints Service and Standards Committees Regulations / Deduction of costs without authority.
-
Cameron & Ors as Trustees of the Normac Trust v Stevenson [2011] NZWHT Auckland 17 [PDF, 87 KB] Cameron & Ors as Trustees of the Normac Trust v Stevenson [2011] NZWHT Auckland 17 costs decision TRI 2009-101-000012/DBH 2891. Decision date 25 March 2011. See 2010 decisions for the substantive decision.
-
Beattie v Porirua City Council [2011] NZWHT Wellington 18 [PDF, 48 KB] Beattie v Porirua City Council [2011] NZWHT Wellington 18 costs decision TRI 2010-101-000009/DBH 6006. Decision date 25 March 2011. See 2010 decisions for the substantive decision.
-
AR v ZG LCRO 60 / 2010 (15 March 2011) [PDF, 82 KB] Complaint not upheld when Practitioner charged Trust fees whilst acting on instructions of one trustee / Law Practitioners Act 1982 applies
-
Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee v Parlane [2011] NZLCDT 3 [PDF, 125 KB] Decision on Costs (11 March 2011)
-
[2011] NZCA 56 CA687/2009 New Zealand Dairy Workers' Union Inc v Open Country Cheese Company Ltd [PDF, 142 KB] JUDGMENT OF THE COURT, 9 March 2011. The appeal is allowed.The decision of the Employment Court is quashed and substituted by a declaration that the respondent breached s 97(2) of the Employment Relations Act 2000. The appellant is entitled to costs for a standard appeal, to be calculated on a Band A basis together with usual disbursements. We certify for two counsel.
-
[2011] NZEmpC 19 Masina v Commissioner of Te Kura Kaupapa Maori O Piripono Te Kura Whakahou O Otara [PDF, 46 KB] Masina v Commissioner of Te Kura Kaupapa Maori O Piripono Te Kura Whakahou O Otara - costs judgment of Judge M E Perkins.
-
[2011] NZEmpC 14 NZ Amalgamated Engineering Printing and Manufacturing Union v Steelfort Engineering Co Ltd [PDF, 80 KB] NZ Amalgamated Engineering Printing and Manufacturing Union v Steelfort Engineering Co Ltd - costs judgment of Judge A D Ford.
-
Milner v Noanoa-Paul - Atarea Mokai Noanoa (2011) 12 Tairawhiti MB 155 (12 TRW 155) [PDF, 64 KB] 16.02.2011 | Judge Harvey | Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993, sections 117, 79 | Costs
-
Nicholls v Nicholls - Part Papaaroha 6B Block [2011] Māori Appellate Court MB 64 (2011 APPEAL 64) [PDF, 93 KB] 15.02.11 | Deputy Chief Judge Fox, Judge Savage, Judge Harvey | Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993, sections 58, 79 | Costs, Exercise of discretion to award costs
-
CAC 10026 v Dodd [2011] NZREADT 1 [PDF, 184 KB] Decision Date:15 February 2011. A Charges laid under s 91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008
-
[2011] NZEmpC 7 Smith v Life to the Max Horowhenua Trust [PDF, 94 KB] Smith v Life to the Max Horowhenua Trust costs
-
AJ v ZQ LCRO 134 / 2010 (7 February 2011) [PDF, 139 KB] Clients in dispute over disbursement of proceeds of sale of property / Whether solicitor's conduct unsatisfactory in terms of section 12(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 / Retention of funds against further costs constituted breach of section 110(1)(b) and therefore unsatisfactory conduct pursuant to section 12(c)
-
[2011] NZEmpC 2 Jinkinson v Oceania Gold (NZ) Ltd [PDF, 1.4 MB] Jinkinson v Oceania Gold (NZ) Limited - costs.
-
Mok v Boyd [2011] NZWHT Auckland 1 [PDF, 94 KB] Mok v Boyd [2011] NZWHT Auckland 1 costs decision TRI 2009-100-000106/DBH 4569. Decision date 18 January 2011. See 2010 decisions for the substantive decision.
-
ADM Ltd v ZWN and ADN v ZWM [2011] NZDT 162 (14 January 2011) [PDF, 104 KB] Contract / Fair Trading Act 1986 (FTA) / First Respondent hired a truck and excavator from First Applicant / truck collided with power pole while driving / First Applicant repaired the truck and claimed for the excess under terms and conditions / First Respondent counterclaimed that terms and conditions were misleading, excess and costs incurred / Held: First Applicant’s terms and conditions were clear that the hirer is responsible for any damage to hired equipment during term of hire / should the hirer pay “damage waiver”, hirer is then only liable for first $1,000.00 (plus GST) / First Applicant did not engage in misleading conduct under s 11 of FTA / First Respondent had opportunity to review terms and conditions and accepted / no suggestion made by First Applicant that “damage waiver” extended to third party damage / First Respondent formed mistaken impression of cover / claim allowed, counterclaim dismissed, First Respondent ordered to pay First Applicant $1,125.00.
-
Cameron & Ors as Trustees of the Normac Trust v Stevenson [2010] NZWHT Auckland 39 [PDF, 186 KB] Final determination TRI 2009-101-000012/DBH 2891. Decision date 21 December 2010. See also the Cameron & Ors as Trustees of the Normac Trust v Stevenson [2011] NZWHT Auckland 17 TRI 2009-101-000012/DBH 2891 costs determination.
-
AED and AEE v ZVR [2010] NZDT 287 (26 November 2010) [PDF, 54 KB] Dog Control Act 1996 / damages under s 63(1) / claim for costs incurred as a result of attack by Respondent’s dogs on Applicants’ stock/ costs relate to sheep killed, veterinary bills and related expenses / dog owner liable under DCA, s 63(1) for damage caused by dogs / on balance of probabilities, dogs that attacked sheep likely to be Respondent’s dogs / Applicants’ neighbour made convincing identification that dogs caught by Applicants were the same dogs he saw the previous day running from Applicants’ property / First Applicant saw same dogs worrying sheep before she caught the dogs / Respondent identified as owner of the dogs / Respondent ordered to pay $2,789.90.
-
ADW Ltd v ZWC Ltd [2010] NZDT 243 (25 November 2010) [PDF, 56 KB] Contract / declaration of non-liability / Applicant was fitting a premises with an outdoor awning / Respondent gave estimate for how much work would cost / total amount the Respondent invoiced exceeded estimates / Applicant claims it is not liable for the Respondent’s final invoice of $618.75 (incl GST) / contacts for work done imply a term that the price will be reasonable / where price is discussed the law follows the agreement between parties / where estimate is provided the courts will generally allow cost to vary by plus or minus 20 per cent / Respondent’s invoices were nearly twice its estimate / held that the Respondent charged more than it was entitled to pursuant to the agreement between the parties / Applicant not liable to pay the $618.75 (incl GST).
-
JA & JA Bradley Family Trust v Auckland City Council [2010] NZWHT Auckland 37 [PDF, 63 KB] Decision on costs TRI 2010-100-000074/DBH 05687. Decision date 18 November 2010.