Pacific Flight Catering Ltd v Service and Food Workers Union - costs judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
2954 items matching your search terms
-
[2012] NZEmpC 122 Pacific Flight Catering Ltd v Service and Food Workers Union [PDF, 48 KB] -
AEQ v ZVF & ZVE [2012] NZDT 268 (16 July 2012) [PDF, 48 KB] Contract / Second Respondent’s brother on her behalf made successfully bid on motor vehicle on Trade Me using First Respondent’s account / Second Respondent could not afford to pay for purchase / Applicant re-advertised vehicle and sold at a lesser price / Applicant claimed the difference in price / Tribunal finds First Respondent is not liable as the contract is between Applicant and Second Respondent as bid was made on her behalf / Second Respondent in breach of contract as she failed to pay purchase price / Applicant entitled to recover difference in price and expenses incurred as damages / claim allowed, Second Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $700.00.
-
CAC 10063 v Raj [2012] NZREADT 37 [PDF, 101 KB] Decision Date: 03 July 2012. Charges laid under s 91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008
-
AAV and AAW v ZZG [2012] NZDT 10 (28 June 2012) [PDF, 62 KB] Negligence / Animal Law Reform Act 1989 / Respondent’s cattlebeast escaped on the road / collided with Applicant’s car causing extensive damage / car written off / issues are whether respondent failed to take reasonable care if third party had left gate open and whether storage costs while Applicant’s wreck was being sold are established / held that Respondent failed to take reasonable care to ensure stock did not stray on to road – either by leaving gate open himself or allowing third party to do so / storage period of 52 days not foreseeable and is therefore reduced to 14 days / sum awarded reduced accordingly by $218.50 / Respondent ordered to pay $6,901.26 / Respondent to pay the money to Applicant’s insurer.
-
Kapohe Family Trust v Cleland [2012] NZWHT Auckland 29 [PDF, 14 KB] Kapohe Family Trust v Cleland [2012] NZWHT Auckland 29 quantum of costs TRI 2011-100-00080/DBH 6548. Decision date 25 June 2012. See also the Kapohe Family Trust v Cleland [2012] NZWHT Auckland 28 costs decision.
-
MC v VB LCRO 175 / 2011 (18 June 2012) [PDF, 117 KB] Breach of Rule 5(7) Solicitors Trust Account Rules 1996 / Payment of fees to broker not authorised by client / Breach not such that disciplinary proceedings could have been commenced under Law Practitioners Act 1982. Section 351(1) LCA.
-
Kapohe Family Trust v Cleland [2012] NZWHT Auckland 28 [PDF, 87 KB] Kapohe Family Trust v Cleland [2012] NZWHT Auckland 28 costs decision TRI 2011-100-00080/DBH 6548. Decision date 14 June 2012. See also the Kapohe Family Trust v Cleland [2012] NZWHT Auckland 29 quantum of costs.
-
CAC 10043 v Brooker - Penalty Decision [2012] NZREADT 31 [PDF, 107 KB] Decision Date: 11 June 2012. A Charges laid under s 91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008
-
Tauhara Middle 4A1N1B (2012) 16 Takitimu MB 226 (16 TKT 226) [PDF, 172 KB] 05.06.2012 | Judge Spencer | Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993, section 79 | Costs
-
CAC 10031 v Lum-On [2012] NZREADT 30 [PDF, 144 KB] Decision Date: 01 June 2012. A Charges laid under s 91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008
-
Nikau v Rongomau - Whangape Parish Lot 23B Horahora Marae [2012] Māori Appellate Court MB 300 (2012 APPEAL 300) [PDF, 132 KB] 01.06.12 | Judge Spencer, Judge Ambler, Judge Reeves | Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993, section 79 | Costs
-
LG v Otago SC LCRO 275 / 2011 (29 May 2012) [PDF, 80 KB] Breach of an undertaking / Standards Committee must properly exercise discretion as to whether to lay charges before LCDT / Breach of an undertaking may constitute unsatisfactory conduct depending on the circumstances.
-
Heather v IDEA Services Ltd (Costs) [2012] NZHRRT 11 [PDF, 55 KB] Decision date: 23 May 2012. Human Rights Act 1993.
-
Mika - Te Manawa o Tuhoe (2012) 54 Waiariki MB 16 (54 WAR 16) [PDF, 186 KB] 22.05.2012 | Judge Coxhead | Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993, section 244 | Trusts, Replacement of responsible trust, Transition period to allow for transfer, Trustees’ fees during transition period, Ex-gratia payment
-
CAC 10003 v Kumandan [2012] NZREADT 26 [PDF, 90 KB] Decision Date:17 May 2012. A Charges laid under s 91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008
-
IG v QV LCRO 75 / 2011 (15 May 2012) - Addendum [PDF, 35 KB] Complaints of overcharging not upheld by SC / Lawyer had been paid in advance for Court case that settled without attending Court / LCRO redirected matter back to SC to obtain Costs Assessor.
-
IG v QV LCRO 75 / 2011 (10 May 2012) [PDF, 72 KB] Complaints of overcharging not upheld by SC / Lawyer had been paid in advance for Court case that settled without attending Court / LCRO redirected matter back to SC to obtain Costs Assessor.
-
CAC 10043 v Brooker [2012] NZREADT 23 [PDF, 112 KB] Decision Date:03 May 2012. A Charges laid under s 91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008
-
[2012] NZEmpC 68 Postal Workers Union v NZ Post Ltd [PDF, 110 KB] Postal Workers Union v NZ Post Ltd - costs judgment of Judge C Inglis.
-
Vercoe v Barns - Parish of Matata 39A2A and 39A2B2B2A [2012] Māori Appellate Court MB 149 (2012 APPEAL 149) [PDF, 253 KB] 29.03.12 | Deputy Chief Judge Fox, Judge Ambler, Judge Reeves | Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993, sections 58, 79 | Costs
-
CAC 10054 v Subritzky [2012] NZREADT 20 [PDF, 122 KB] Decision Date: 26 April 2012. Charges laid under s 91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008
-
CAC 10054 v Subritzky [2012] NZREADT 19 [PDF, 129 KB] Decision Date:26 April 2012. A Charges laid under s 91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008
-
N v CAC 10058 [2012] NZREADT 18 [PDF, 121 KB] Decision Date: 24 April 2012. A Charges laid under s 91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008
-
AEL Ltd v ZVL [2012] NZDT 310 (17 April 2012) [PDF, 43 KB] Contract / Applicant claims $506.93 in respect of plumbing services rendered by Respondent and additional administrative costs / Respondent claims its insurer should make the relevant payment / Respondent did not deny existence of contract or that services were rendered / issue of whether the Respondent’s insurer should pay is an issue between the Respondent and its insurer / Applicant is entitled to payment of services but not additional charges as lack of evidence that Respondent accepted the additional charges / Tribunal filing fee only recoverable in exceptional circumstances which do not apply / Respondent to pay Applicant $312.57.
-
AEF Ltd v ZVQ [2012] NZDT 325 (16 April 2012) [PDF, 49 KB] Contract / Money owing on a debt / Respondent given notice in writing and via email / question of the Respondent’s liability for collection costs and interest after notice / Terms of Hire were clear as to interest on debts / terms did not specify whether the interest accrued on existing overdue amounts / interest not charged prior to notice as this would have been to apply interest retrospectively / a retrospective application of the clause would amount to a harsh exercise of its enforcement powers for the purpose of s 19(e) of the Disputes Tribunals Act / Respondent to pay debt collection fees and a reduced amount of interest from that claimed.