You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.

Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Search results

3642 items matching your search terms

  1. [2021] NZEmpC 66 Smartlift Systems Ltd v Armstrong [PDF, 320 KB]

    [2021] NZEmpC 66 Smartlift Systems Ltd v Armstrong (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 7 May 2021) PERSONAL GRIEVANCE – NON-DO NOVO CHALLENGE – no error of law or fact made by Authority in finding there was insufficient consultation for redundancy – no error made by Authority in determining the breaches were not minor – Authority compensation awards slightly reduced – Authority was correct in finding no reduction needed to be made for contribution.

  2. [2021] NZEmpC 55 MacLeod and Others v Wellington City Transport Ltd and CityLine (NZ) Ltd [PDF, 257 KB]

    [2021] NZEmpC 55 Macleod v Wellington City Transport Ltd (Reasons for Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 26 April 2021) REASONS FOR GRANTING INTERIM INJUNCTION – prima facie case made that lockouts were unlawful – lockout arguably sidesteps requirement to initiate MECA bargaining – lockout arguably improperly compelled union to accept a MECA when only SECA bargaining was initiated – proposed collective agreement arguably contains unlawful availability provision – balance of convenience favours granting interim injunction.

  3. [2021] NZEmpC 45 Senate Investment Trust Through Crown Lease Trustees Ltdv Cooper [PDF, 248 KB]

    [2021] NZEmpC 45 Senate Investment Trust Through Crown Lease Trustees Ltdv Cooper (Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 14 April 2021) UNJUSTIFIABLE DISMISSAL – TRIAL PERIOD – employee began work without signing employment agreement – agreement did not contain advice of entitlement to seek independent advice – agreement’s notice period was not complied with – trial period could not be validly enforced – dismissal was unjustifiable.

  4. [2021] NZEmpC 43 Alkazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd [PDF, 177 KB]

    [2021] NZEmpC 43 Alkazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment (No 8) of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 31 March 2021) APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT –  no basis for strike out – application declined - APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT APPLICATION FOR STRIKE OUT – application was denied rather than struck out - APPLICATION FOR FURTHER SECURITY FOR COSTS – proceedings becoming increasingly complex – further security ordered.