You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.

Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Search results

3418 items matching your search terms

  1. [2020] NZEmpC 184 Labour Inspector v Samra Holdings Ltd [PDF, 222 KB]

    [2020] NZEmpC 184 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v Samra Holdings Ltd t/a Te Puna Liquor Centre (Judgment of Judge K Beck, 6 November 2020) APPLICATION FOR FREEZING ORDER WITHOUT NOTICE – respondent allegedly in process of selling business – strongly arguable case for breaches of minimum entitlements – assets are in the jurisdiction and at risk of being dissipated – balance of convenience and overall justice favour granting an interim order without notice – order granted.

  2. [2020] NZEmpC 177 MacKenzie v Huntington’s Disease Association (Auckland) Inc [PDF, 242 KB]

    [2020] NZEmpC 177 MacKenzie v Huntington’s Disease Association (Auckland) Inc  (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 3 November 2020) PERSONAL GRIEVANCE – CONSTRUCTIVE DISMISSAL – employee refused to return to work until alleged grievances were dealt with – employer was entitled to view this as abandonment – employee was not constructively dismissed – UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – insufficient evidence to establish disadvantage.

  3. [2020] NZEmpC 175 O’Boyle v McCue [PDF, 612 KB]

    [2020] NZEmpC 175 O’Boyle v McCue (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 29 October 2020) PERSONAL GRIEVANCE – CONSTRUCTIVE DISMISSAL – UNPAID ENTITLEMENTS –employer remained O’Boyle in personal capacity even after incorporation – unpaid holiday and public holiday pay quantified - employee was constructively dismissed – disadvantage for failure to provide written employment agreement – disadvantage for failing to record holiday and leave – disadvantage for warning – compensation and lost wages awarded.

  4. [2020] NZEmpC 171 Alkazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd [PDF, 243 KB]

    [2020] NZEmpC 171 Alkazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd (Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 22 October 2020) APPLICATION FOR REOPENING AUTHORITY INVESTIGATION – no evidence that witnesses for the company submitted false evidence – witnesses could have been cross-examined in the Authority investigation – no fresh evidence that could not have been adduced in the Authority investigation, nor made a material difference to the outcome – application declined.

  5. [2020] NZEmpC 169 Morgan v Tranzit Coachlines Wairarapa Ltd [PDF, 276 KB]

    [2020] NZEmpC 169 Morgan v Tranzit Coachlines Wairarapa Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Chief Judge C Inglis, 14 October 2020) APPLICATION FOR FURTHER ORDERS – ANNUAL LEAVE – employee was found to be permanent employee in substantive judgment – employee never worked 12 months continuously – unpaid leave pushes leave anniversary back but annual leave must still be provided - PUBLIC HOLIDAYS – annual leave cannot be scheduled during public holidays – public holidays would not have been days otherwise worked – no entitlement to claimed paid public holidays.

  6. [2020] NZEmpC 167 Noble v Ballooning Canterbury.com Ltd [PDF, 287 KB]

    [2020] NZEmpC 167 Noble v Ballooning Canterbury.com Ltd (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 14 October 2020) COSTS – COSTS IN THE AUTHORITY – plaintiff seeking and discontinuing claim for pecuniary penalties was an aggravating factor – costs higher than usual daily tariff – COSTS IN THE COURT – guideline scale applied – appropriate guideline scale category was 3, not 2 – Band B was the appropriate band, not C – Calderbank offer considered to increase costs – COSTS ON INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION AFTER CHALLENGE RESOLVED – costs awarded.

  7. [2020] NZEmpC 166 New Zealand Resident Doctors Assoc v Auckland District Health Board [PDF, 336 KB]

    [2020] NZEmpC 166 New Zealand Resident Doctors Assoc v Auckland District Health Board (Judgment of the Full Court, 14 October 2020) INTERPRETATION OF COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT – employees rotate between employers in different regions of Auckland – whether employees are “new employees” upon each rotation – ordinary meaning of “new employees” should be applied – employees are “new employees” upon each rotation – two possible collective agreements to apply depending on work to be performed – work to be categorised according to the college to which they may be attached.

  8. [2020] NZEmpC 165 Culturesafe NZ Ltd v Turuki Healthcare Services Charitable Trust [PDF, 294 KB]

    [2020] NZEmpC 165 Culturesafe NZ Ltd v Turuki Healthcare Services Charitable Trust (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 14 October 2020) PENALTIES – AUTHORITY JURISDICTION – QUANTUM – Authority had jurisdiction to award penalties for breach of record of settlement, including by non-parties – compliance orders were appropriate - Authority did not have jurisdiction to award general damages – penalties are payable but not on a joint and several basis – penalties reduced.