[2021] NZEmpC 185 S v N (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 28 October 2021) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE A NOTICE OF OPPOSITION – application granted by consent.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3630 items matching your search terms
-
[2021] NZEmpC 185 S v N [PDF, 142 KB] -
[2021] NZEmpC 184 Coetzee v Oamaru Meats Ltd [PDF, 209 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 184 Coetzee v Oamaru Meats Ltd (Costs Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 27 October 2021) COSTS – GUIDELINE SCALE – financial circumstances do not justify a reduction in cost – costs awarded.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 183 Stenhouse v Towman Towing Group Ltd [PDF, 303 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 183 Stenhouse v Towman Towing Group Ltd (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 26 October 2021) PERSONAL GRIEVANCE – UNJUSTIFIABLE DISMISSAL – company did not produce evidence to justify dismissal – compensation awarded – UNJUSTIFIABLE DISADVANTAGE – company fairly investigated bullying complaint – preventing employee from conducting work was an unjustifiable disadvantage – compensation awarded.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 180 Scullin v Airways Corp of New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 218 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 180 Scullin v Airways Corp of New Zealand Ltd (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 21 October 2021) APPLICATION FOR INTERIM REINSTATEMENT – arguable case for unjustifiable dismissal established – company cannot reinstate employee because of licensing issues – reinstatement not practicable – application declined.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 182 Ututaonga v North Western Farms Ltd [PDF, 170 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 182 Ututaonga v North Western Farms Ltd (Costs Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 21 October 2021) COSTS – GUIDELINE SCALE – costs increased for irrelevant and inadmissible material.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 181 Wanaka Pharmacy Ltd v McKay [PDF, 221 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 181 Wanaka Pharmacy Ltd v McKay (Costs Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 21 October 2021) COSTS – GUIDELINE SCALE – company was the successful party by reducing remedies – employee had partial success – costs awarded with 50% reduction.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 179 Yakka Contracting Ltd v Naicker [PDF, 140 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 179 Yakka Contracting Ltd v Naicker (Consent Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 18 October 2021) FREEZING ORDER - CONSENT.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 178 Guan v Jay.Co Ltd [PDF, 250 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 178 Guan v Jay.Co Ltd (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 18 October 2021) UNPAID WAGES – PREMIUM - Authority was correct about number of hours worked by employee – Authority was correct that the employee did not pay a premium for employment – challenge dismissed.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 177 Allison v Ceres New Zealand LLC [PDF, 267 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 177 Allison v Ceres New Zealand LLC (Judge of Judge K G Smith, 18 October 2021) UNJUSTIFIABLE DISMISSAL – REDUNDANCY – decision to dismiss was for a proper business reason and not a sham – company followed a fair process – UNJUSTIFIABLE DISADVANTAGE – employee was not disadvantaged by the company changing the locks – suspension was justifiable – company did not breach good faith – challenge dismissed.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 175 FDE v UWV [PDF, 241 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 175 FDE v UWV (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 13 October 2021) PERSONAL GRIEVANCE – UNJUSTIFIABLE DISMISSAL – whether parties mutually agreed to terminate relationship or employee was dismissed – employee resigned on mutually agreed terms – no personal grievance established.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 176 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v Prisha’s Hospitality (2017) Ltd T/A Royal Cambridge Indian Restaurant [PDF, 159 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 176 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v Prisha’s Hospitality (2017) Ltd T/A Royal Cambridge Indian Restaurant (Judgment (No 2) of Judge J C Holden, 13 October 2021) DISCHARGE OF FREEZING ORDER - consent.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 174 Hope v Attorney-General [PDF, 159 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 174 Hope v Attorney-General (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 12 October 2021) APPOINTMENT OF LITIGATION GUARDIAN – guardian appointed.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 173 Fechney v Employment Relations Authority [PDF, 150 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 173 Fechney v Employment Relations Authority (Oral Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 12 October 2021) DISCHARGE OF NON-PUBLICATION ORDER - consent.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 172 Shah Enterprise NZ Ltd v A Labour Inspector of Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment [PDF, 178 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 172 Shah Enterprise NZ Ltd v A Labour Inspector of Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (Interlocutory Judgment (No 3) of Judge J C Holden, 11 October 2021) APPLICATION FOR EVIDENCE TO BE HEARD BY AUDIO-VISUAL LINK – application granted.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 171 Hope v Attorney-General [PDF, 195 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 171 Hope v Attorney-General (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 8 October 2021) APPLICATION IN RELATION TO APPOINTMENT OF LITIGATION GUARDIAN – litigation guardian is appropriate if not necessary – suggested litigation guardian is not suitable – independent lawyer to be appointed.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 170 Oasis Network Inc v Douds [PDF, 249 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 170 Oasis Network Inc v Douds (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 7 October 2021) APPLICATION FOR STAY – Court not persuaded that an order of stay should be made – APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT – claim not frivolous or vexatious – amended statement of claim to be filed – applications declined.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 169 Smiths City (Southern) Ltd (in receivership) v Claxton [PDF, 518 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 169 Smiths City (Southern) Ltd (in receivership) v Claxton (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 5 October 2021) BREACH OF CONTRACT – employees were in competition with employer – employees did not have permission from employer – being in competition was breach of employment agreement and duty of fidelity – damages awarded – PENALTIES – companies created by employees did not have requisite knowledge – company is already fully recompensed – no penalties against employees.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 168 Juyi International Ltd v Pan [PDF, 283 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 168 Juyi International Ltd v Pan (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 5 October 2021) UNJUST ENRICHMENT – employee had an agreement with employer to renovate kitchen in exchange for future holiday pay – wages must be paid in cash – deductions from wages can only be made with written consent – no written consent was given - UNPAID WAGES – REST BREAKS - Authority was correct that no unpaid wages are owed and that all rest breaks were paid for.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 167 UXK v Talent Propeller Ltd [PDF, 379 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 167 UXK v Talent Propeller Ltd (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 5 October 2021) CHALLENGE TO AUTHORITY MINUTE – DISCLOSURE – Authority ordered disclosure of judgment that was subject to District Court suppression order – Authority minute was a determination that could be challenged – Authority should have inspected the document itself to decide on relevance – Authority could not pull unredacted document from other proceedings on its own.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 166 Yakka Contracting Ltd v Naicker [PDF, 208 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 166 Yakka Contracting Ltd v Naicker (Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 1 October 2021) REASONS FOR FREEZING ORDER – company had a good arguable case of breach of good faith – real risk established that assets exist in the jurisdiction at risk of dissipation – balance of convenience favoured granting freezing order.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 165 Bowen v Bank of New Zealand [PDF, 190 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 165 Bowen v Bank of New Zealand (Costs Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 1 October 2021) COSTS – GUIDELINE SCALE – costs awarded.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 164 Alkazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd [PDF, 117 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 164 Alkazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment (No 4) of Judge J C Holden, 29 September 2021) APPLICATION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS – consent.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 163 The 20 District Health Boards v New Zealand Nurses Organisation [PDF, 237 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 163 The 20 District Health Boards v New Zealand Nurses Organisation (Costs Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 28 September 2021) APPLICATION FOR COSTS – not a “test case” of such novelty or wide public interest that costs should lie where they fall– category 3B awarded with a reduction taking into account potential broader implications for others – disbursements for travel and accommodation awarded – application granted.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 162 GF v New Zealand Customs Service [PDF, 176 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 162 GF v New Zealand Customs Service (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 28 September 2021) APPLICATION FOR NON-PUBLICATION – publication can have significant detrimental impact on ongoing prospects of employment – vaccination issues are contentious and hotly debated – likely exposure to intense public scrutiny – application granted.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 161 A Labour Inspector v Prisha’s Hospitality (2017) Ltd T/A Royal Cambridge Indian Restaurant [PDF, 198 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 161 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v Prisha’s Hospitality (2017) Ltd T/A Royal Cambridge Indian Restaurant (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 24 September 2021) APPLICATION FOR FREEZING AND ANCILIARY ORDERS – Labour Inspector has good arguable case – respondents have assets to be sold – making the application without notice and with urgency was appropriate – application granted.