You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.

Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Search results

3418 items matching your search terms

  1. [2020] NZEmpC 236 Maheta v Skybus New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 259 KB]

    [2020] NZEmpC 236 Maheta v Skybus New Zealand Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 18 December 2020) APPLICATION FOR STAY – Authority costs determination was not challenged – nothing to stay - APPLICATION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS – plaintiff would have trouble paying if unsuccessful in his challenge – merits of challenge are questionable – plaintiff’s previous conduct suggests increased costs – security for costs ordered.

  2. [2020] NZEmpC 230 Arachchige v Rasier New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 398 KB]

    [2020] NZEmpC 230 Arachchige v Rasier New Zealand Ltd (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 17 December 2020) APPLICATION FOR DECLARATION OF EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP – applicant is driver for Uber – applicant was previously a taxi driver running a business on his own account – applicant’s work was not exclusive to Uber – applicant was not vulnerable or lacking in comprehension – applicant was in control of work hours, equipment, and tax – applicant had ability to increase profitability in some ways – work is integral to Uber’s business but Uber lacked control over how it was undertaken – industry practice not a helpful consideration – applicant was not an employee of Uber.

  3. [2020] NZEmpC 222 Flashoff v New Zealand Technology Group Hawkes Bay Ltd [PDF, 311 KB]

    [2020] NZEmpC 222 Flashoff v New Zealand Technology Group Hawkes Bay Ltd (Reasons for Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 9 December 2020) REASONS FOR DISCHARGE ORDER AND CHALLENGE TO INTERIM INJUNUCTION BEING GRANTED – order was granted in earlier judgment – employment agreements were tied to commercial issues – commercial issues must be resolved in general jurisdiction – balance of convenience and interest of justice favour point against interim injunction and continuing freezing orders.

  4. [2020] NZEmpC 219 Ward v Concrete Structures (NZ) Ltd [PDF, 282 KB]

    [2020] NZEmpC 219 Ward v Concrete Structures (NZ) Ltd (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 4 December 2020) PERSONAL GRIEVANCE – UNJUSTIFIABLE DISMISSAL – dismissal is assessed objectively so employee can be dismissed without knowing it – employee was dismissed – dismissal was not justifiable - $30,000 awarded for compensation – employee’s lack of active mitigation viewed in context of mental health issues – 15 months of lost wages awarded – no reduction for contribution.