You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.

Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Search results

3630 items matching your search terms

  1. [2022] NZEmpC 4 Chief of the New Zealand Defence Force v Darnley [PDF, 401 KB]

    [2022] NZEmpC 4 Chief of the New Zealand Defence Force v Darnley (Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 20 January 2022, Reissued 30 March 2022) CONSTRUCTIVE DISMISSAL – employer breached duty to employee by making unsubstantiated allegation at beginning of investigation process and by making conclusion on investigation before seeking comment – employee was not induced to resign by these breaches but rather by finding alternative employment – breaches were not sufficiently serious to make resignation reasonably foreseeable – employee was not constructively dismissed – UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – letter by employer was unjustifiable and caused disadvantage – compensation for hurt and humiliation awarded – reduction made for contribution – BREACH OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT AND GOOD FAITH – employee breached employment agreement and good faith by failing to provide notice of resignation -  small penalty awarded.

  2. [2021] NZEmpC 217 Humphreys v Humphreys and Chief Executive of the Ministry of Health [PDF, 368 KB]

    [2021] NZEmpC 217 Humphreys v Humphreys and Chief Executive of the Ministry of Health (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 8 December 2021) APPLICATION FOR SECTION 6 DECLARATION - DISABILITY CARE - severely mentally disabled adult could not have employed the applicant in spite of Gazette notice - applicant was engaged by the Minister of Health - caring for severely mentally disabled adult was a responsibility of the Minister of Health under international obligations - applicant's work was undertaken in a dwellinghouse - applicant was a homeworker and therefore an employee of the Minister of Health - employee entitled to be paid for all hours work as assessed under Idea Services Ltd v Dickson test.