[2022] NZEmpC 20 Courage v Attorney-General (Interlocutory Judgment (No 3) of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 11 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO REQUIRE ANSWER TO INTERROGATORIES – relevance is arguable – requested interrogatories are oppressive with limited time until hearing – application declined.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3630 items matching your search terms
-
[2022] NZEmpC 20 Courage v Attorney-General [PDF, 195 KB] -
[2022] NZEmpC 19 Kang v Saena Company Ltd [PDF, 175 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 19 Kang v Saena Company Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge Inglis, 10 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED PLEADINGS – applicant should be allowed to increase quantum of remedies sought – application granted – APPLICATION TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE – evidence to be included but taken into account when considering costs – ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE – part of evidence contains reference to mediation – offending paragraphs to be struck out.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 18 Courage v Attorney-General [PDF, 173 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 18 Courage v Attorney-General (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Chief Judge Inglis, 10 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR IN-COURT MEDIA COVERAGE – proceedings have public importance and genuine public interest – privacy concerns can be addressed – applicant I bound by rules and protocols to alleviate possibility of unbalanced reporting – application granted.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 17 Smiths City (Southern) Ltd (in rec) v Claxton [PDF, 155 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 17 Smiths City (Southern) Ltd (in rec) v Claxton (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 10 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR STAY – granted by consent.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 16 Courage v Attorney-General [PDF, 167 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 16 Courage v Attorney-General (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 9 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR IN-COURT MEDIA COVERAGE – applicant can attend hearing without making a recording.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 15 Alkazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd [PDF, 199 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 15 Alkazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment (No 11) of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 8 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR RECALL OF JUDGMENT OR REHEARING – no grounds for recall or rehearing – application declined.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 14 Farrand Orchards Ltd v Tane [PDF, 171 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 14 Farrand Orchards Ltd v Tane (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 8 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE STATEMENT OF DEFENCE – minimal delay – lack of prejudice – application granted.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 13 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v JDFOODS Ltd [PDF, 153 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 13 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v JDFOODS Ltd (Judgment of Judge Corkill, 8 February 2022) FREEZING ORDER – variation by consent.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 12 Cronin-Lampe v The Board of Trustees of Melville High School [PDF, 179 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 12 Cronin-Lampe v The Board of Trustees of Melville High School (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 8 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR STAY – Court of Appeal to hear appeal on preliminary point – confined period involved – absence of opposition – application granted.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 11 Vivo Beauty Ltd v Hunt [PDF, 137 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 11 Vivo Beauty Ltd v Hunt (Consent Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 4 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR STAY - consent.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 10 Shaw v Bay of Plenty District Health Board [PDF, 376 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 10 Shaw v Bay of Plenty District Health Board (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 4 February 2022) PERSONAL GRIEVANCE – UNJUSTIFIABLE DISADVANTAGE – employee did not raise grievance of being bullied – UNJUSTIFIABLE DISMISSAL – employee was dismissed for breaching confidential patient records – dismissal was procedurally and substantively justifiable – challenge dismissed.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 9 Best Health Foods Ltd v Zhou [PDF, 148 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 9 Best Health Foods Ltd v Zhou (Costs Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 2 February 2022) COSTS – witness fees awarded.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 7 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v JDFoods Ltd [PDF, 160 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 7 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v JDFoods Ltd (Oral Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 28 January 2021) APPLICATION TO DISCHARGE FREEZING ORDER – parties to give further evidence – refined freezing order made.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 6 JKL v Stirling Andersen Ltd [PDF, 114 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 6 JKL v Stirling Andersen Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 24 January 2022) APPLICATION FOR NON-PUBLICATION ORDER – determination contains information relating to domestic violence abuse – non-publication order granted – Authority determinations to remove identifying details.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 5 VMR v Civil Aviation Authority [PDF, 519 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 5 VMR v Civil Aviation Authority (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 24 January 2022) APPLICATION FOR INTERIM REINSTATEMENT – weakly arguable case for unjustifiable dismissal – weakly arguable case for permanent reinstatement – employing unvaccinated workers likely to be in breach of COVID-19 Public Health Response (Vaccinations) Order 2021 – reinstatement would not be appropriate if it would lead to a breach by the employer – balance of convenience weighs against interim reinstatement – application declined - APPLICATION FOR INTERIM NON-PUBLICATION – non-publication granted in other jurisdictions – significant public interest in mandatory vaccinations – application granted.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 1 GF v OO [PDF, 193 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 1 GF v OO (Costs Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 21 January 2021) COSTS – employee is unemployed because of decision not to be vaccinated – cases involving intersection between COVID-19 and employment rights should not be impeded in the interests of justice – costs to lie where they fall.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 4 Chief of the New Zealand Defence Force v Darnley [PDF, 401 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 4 Chief of the New Zealand Defence Force v Darnley (Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 20 January 2022, Reissued 30 March 2022) CONSTRUCTIVE DISMISSAL – employer breached duty to employee by making unsubstantiated allegation at beginning of investigation process and by making conclusion on investigation before seeking comment – employee was not induced to resign by these breaches but rather by finding alternative employment – breaches were not sufficiently serious to make resignation reasonably foreseeable – employee was not constructively dismissed – UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – letter by employer was unjustifiable and caused disadvantage – compensation for hurt and humiliation awarded – reduction made for contribution – BREACH OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT AND GOOD FAITH – employee breached employment agreement and good faith by failing to provide notice of resignation - small penalty awarded.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 3 Tupe v The Board of Trustees of Te Manawa O Tuhoe Trust [PDF, 221 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 3 Tupe v The Board of Trustees of Te Manawa O Tuhoe Trust (Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 20 January 2022) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE A CHALLENGE – delay resulted from mistake by representative – length of delay was modest – no obvious lack of merit – application granted.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 2 Orora Packaging New Zealand Ltd v E Tu Inc [PDF, 141 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 2 Orora Packaging New Zealand Ltd v E Tu Inc (Consent Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 20 January 2022) CONSENT – confidential settlement.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 232 McDonnell v The Board of Trustees of Te Manawa O Tuhoe Trust [PDF, 183 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 232 McDonnell v The Board of Trustees of Te Manawa O Tuhoe Trust (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 22 December 2021) COMPLIANCE ORDER – REINSTATEMENT – reinstatement has not been effected – breach is ongoing – compliance order to reinstate immediately granted.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 231 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v JDFOODS Ltd [PDF, 242 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 231 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v JDFOODS Ltd (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 22 December 2021) APPLICATION FOR FREEZING AND ANCILLARY ORDER – good arguable case established – assets in jurisdiction may be at risk of disposal – application granted.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 230 Allison v Ceres New Zealand LLC [PDF, 175 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 230 Allison v Ceres New Zealand LLC (Costs Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 22 December 2021) COSTS – GUIDELINE SCALE – reduction for financial circumstances not appropriate – Calderbank offer considered – costs awarded.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 229 Mataura Milk Valley Ltd v Scott [PDF, 148 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 229 Mataura Milk Valley Ltd v Scott (Interlocutory Judgment (No 4) of Judge K G Smith, 21 December 2021) SEARCH ORDER – partial discharge.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 228 Butt v Attorney-General [PDF, 252 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 228 Butt v Attorney-General (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Judge Kathryn Beck, 20 December 2021) APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT PROCEEDINGS – settlement agreement covers statement of claim – settlement may have been induced by misrepresentation – further evidence is required – application declined.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 227 AlKazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd [PDF, 162 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 227 AlKazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment (No 6) of Judge J C Holden, 16 December 2021) APPLICATION TO ADDUCE FURTHER EVIDENCE – limited oral evidence permitted – application granted in part.