You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.

Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Search results

3630 items matching your search terms

  1. [2022] NZEmpC 19 Kang v Saena Company Ltd [PDF, 175 KB]

    [2022] NZEmpC 19 Kang v Saena Company Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge Inglis, 10 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED PLEADINGS – applicant should be allowed to increase quantum of remedies sought – application granted – APPLICATION TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE – evidence to be included but taken into account when considering costs – ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE – part of evidence contains reference to mediation – offending paragraphs to be struck out.

  2. [2022] NZEmpC 5 VMR v Civil Aviation Authority [PDF, 519 KB]

    [2022] NZEmpC 5 VMR v Civil Aviation Authority (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 24 January 2022) APPLICATION FOR INTERIM REINSTATEMENT – weakly arguable case for unjustifiable dismissal – weakly arguable case for permanent reinstatement – employing unvaccinated workers likely to be in breach of COVID-19 Public Health Response (Vaccinations) Order 2021 – reinstatement would not be appropriate if it would lead to a breach by the employer – balance of convenience weighs against interim reinstatement – application declined - APPLICATION FOR INTERIM NON-PUBLICATION – non-publication granted in other jurisdictions – significant public interest in mandatory vaccinations – application granted.

  3. [2022] NZEmpC 4 Chief of the New Zealand Defence Force v Darnley [PDF, 401 KB]

    [2022] NZEmpC 4 Chief of the New Zealand Defence Force v Darnley (Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 20 January 2022, Reissued 30 March 2022) CONSTRUCTIVE DISMISSAL – employer breached duty to employee by making unsubstantiated allegation at beginning of investigation process and by making conclusion on investigation before seeking comment – employee was not induced to resign by these breaches but rather by finding alternative employment – breaches were not sufficiently serious to make resignation reasonably foreseeable – employee was not constructively dismissed – UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – letter by employer was unjustifiable and caused disadvantage – compensation for hurt and humiliation awarded – reduction made for contribution – BREACH OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT AND GOOD FAITH – employee breached employment agreement and good faith by failing to provide notice of resignation -  small penalty awarded.