You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.

Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Search results

3418 items matching your search terms

  1. [2021] NZEmpC 45 Senate Investment Trust Through Crown Lease Trustees Ltdv Cooper [PDF, 248 KB]

    [2021] NZEmpC 45 Senate Investment Trust Through Crown Lease Trustees Ltdv Cooper (Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 14 April 2021) UNJUSTIFIABLE DISMISSAL – TRIAL PERIOD – employee began work without signing employment agreement – agreement did not contain advice of entitlement to seek independent advice – agreement’s notice period was not complied with – trial period could not be validly enforced – dismissal was unjustifiable.

  2. [2021] NZEmpC 43 Alkazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd [PDF, 177 KB]

    [2021] NZEmpC 43 Alkazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment (No 8) of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 31 March 2021) APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT –  no basis for strike out – application declined - APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT APPLICATION FOR STRIKE OUT – application was denied rather than struck out - APPLICATION FOR FURTHER SECURITY FOR COSTS – proceedings becoming increasingly complex – further security ordered.

  3. [2021] NZEmpC 39 TPT Forests Ltd v Penfold [PDF, 240 KB]

    [2021] NZEmpC 39 TPT Forests Ltd v Penfold (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 31 March 2021) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO SET ASIDE SEARCH ORDER – wrong party named on order – name was of related company – search order already executed – application declined - APPLICATION TO JOIN PARTY – related party joined - APPLICATION FOR INTERIM NON-PUBLICATION ORDER – no specific adverse consequences would result from publication – application declined.

  4. [2021] NZEmpC 35 Radford v Chief of New Zealand Defence Force [PDF, 415 KB]

    [2021] NZEmpC 35 Radford v Chief of New Zealand Defence Force (Judgment of the full Court, 24 March 2021) JURISDICTION – place of employment was Washington DC – agreement provided for US law to apply but imported concepts from New Zealand employment law – employee was not part of the Civil Staff  under the Defence Act – US law applies to agreement but with consideration of Employment Relations Act 2000 – Authority has jurisdiction to hear the case – New Zealand is the appropriate forum for the dispute.

  5. [2021] NZEmpC 25 Smiths City (Southern) Ltd (in receivership) v Claxton [PDF, 296 KB]

    [2021] NZEmpC 25 Smiths City (Southern) Ltd (in receivership) v Claxton (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 12 March 2021) APPLICATION FOR STAY – restraints of trade were assigned to related company – assignment was lawful because of close connection between companies – plaintiff did not disclose litigation funding – not an abuse of process – application dismissed -  APPLICATION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS – deed of guarantee and indemnity provided.