[2022] NZEmpC 30 Cousens v Star Nelson Holdings Ltd (Oral Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 24 February 2022) COMPLIANCE ORDER – PENALTY – compliance order of Authority was not complied with – penalty awarded.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3630 items matching your search terms
-
[2022] NZEmpC 30 Cousens v Star Nelson Holdings Ltd [PDF, 210 KB] -
[2022] NZEmpC 29 Courage v Attorney-General [PDF, 166 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 29 Courage v Attorney-General (Interlocutory Judgment (No 6) of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 23 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR IN-COURT MEDIA COVERAGE – proceedings are of significant public interest – application granted.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 28 Smiths City (Southern) Ltd (in rec) v Milne [PDF, 142 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 28 Smiths City (Southern) Ltd (in rec) v Milne (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 21 February 2022) CONSENT – costs settled by consent.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 27 Courage v Attorney-General [PDF, 232 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 27 Courage v Attorney-General (Interlocutory Judgment (No 5) of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 18 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR PERMANENT NON-PUBLICATION ORDERS – no evidence of commercial sensitivity – no specific adverse consequences in relation to privacy concerns – application declined.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 26 Tupe v The Board of Trustees of Te Manawa O Tuhoe Trust [PDF, 192 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 26 Tupe v The Board of Trustees of Te Manawa O Tuhoe Trust (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 16 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS – claim does not obviously lack merit – no evidence of impecuniosity – no evidence of a pattern of litigious behaviour – application declined.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 25 UBP Ltd v Rantiaawa-Kaui [PDF, 219 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 25 UBP Ltd v Rantiaawa-Kaui (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 16 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION – risk of challenge being rendered ineffectual – challenge being pursued in good faith – balance of convenience favours granting stay – application granted.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 24 Drivesure Ltd v McQuillan [PDF, 180 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 24 Drivesure Ltd v McQuillan (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 15 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE A CHALLENGE – delay was caused by representative error and was modest – public interest in challenge – application granted.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 23 Courage v Attorney-General [PDF, 180 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 23 Courage v Attorney-General (Interlocutory Judgment (No 4) of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 11 February 2022) APPLICATION TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE AND/OR CROSS-EXAMINE WITNESSES – cross-examination allowed – evidence not excluded.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 22 Cross v Air New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 107 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 22 Cross v Air New Zealand Ltd (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 11 February 2022) NON-PUBLICATION of certain documents – granted by consent.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 21 Baillie v The Chief Executive of Oranga Tamariki - Ministry for Children [PDF, 222 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 21 Baillie v The Chief Executive of Oranga Tamariki - Ministry for Children (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 11 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR INTERIM REINSTATEMENT – serious question to be tried – no evidence of previous disciplinary matters – satisfied that defendant would be able to have plaintiff at work without undue health and safety risk – period of interim reinstatement relatively short – application granted.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 20 Courage v Attorney-General [PDF, 195 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 20 Courage v Attorney-General (Interlocutory Judgment (No 3) of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 11 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO REQUIRE ANSWER TO INTERROGATORIES – relevance is arguable – requested interrogatories are oppressive with limited time until hearing – application declined.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 19 Kang v Saena Company Ltd [PDF, 175 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 19 Kang v Saena Company Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge Inglis, 10 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED PLEADINGS – applicant should be allowed to increase quantum of remedies sought – application granted – APPLICATION TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE – evidence to be included but taken into account when considering costs – ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE – part of evidence contains reference to mediation – offending paragraphs to be struck out.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 18 Courage v Attorney-General [PDF, 173 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 18 Courage v Attorney-General (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Chief Judge Inglis, 10 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR IN-COURT MEDIA COVERAGE – proceedings have public importance and genuine public interest – privacy concerns can be addressed – applicant I bound by rules and protocols to alleviate possibility of unbalanced reporting – application granted.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 17 Smiths City (Southern) Ltd (in rec) v Claxton [PDF, 155 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 17 Smiths City (Southern) Ltd (in rec) v Claxton (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 10 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR STAY – granted by consent.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 16 Courage v Attorney-General [PDF, 167 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 16 Courage v Attorney-General (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 9 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR IN-COURT MEDIA COVERAGE – applicant can attend hearing without making a recording.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 15 Alkazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd [PDF, 199 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 15 Alkazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment (No 11) of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 8 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR RECALL OF JUDGMENT OR REHEARING – no grounds for recall or rehearing – application declined.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 14 Farrand Orchards Ltd v Tane [PDF, 171 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 14 Farrand Orchards Ltd v Tane (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 8 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE STATEMENT OF DEFENCE – minimal delay – lack of prejudice – application granted.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 13 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v JDFOODS Ltd [PDF, 153 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 13 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v JDFOODS Ltd (Judgment of Judge Corkill, 8 February 2022) FREEZING ORDER – variation by consent.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 12 Cronin-Lampe v The Board of Trustees of Melville High School [PDF, 179 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 12 Cronin-Lampe v The Board of Trustees of Melville High School (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 8 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR STAY – Court of Appeal to hear appeal on preliminary point – confined period involved – absence of opposition – application granted.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 11 Vivo Beauty Ltd v Hunt [PDF, 137 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 11 Vivo Beauty Ltd v Hunt (Consent Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 4 February 2022) APPLICATION FOR STAY - consent.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 10 Shaw v Bay of Plenty District Health Board [PDF, 376 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 10 Shaw v Bay of Plenty District Health Board (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 4 February 2022) PERSONAL GRIEVANCE – UNJUSTIFIABLE DISADVANTAGE – employee did not raise grievance of being bullied – UNJUSTIFIABLE DISMISSAL – employee was dismissed for breaching confidential patient records – dismissal was procedurally and substantively justifiable – challenge dismissed.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 9 Best Health Foods Ltd v Zhou [PDF, 148 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 9 Best Health Foods Ltd v Zhou (Costs Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 2 February 2022) COSTS – witness fees awarded.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 7 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v JDFoods Ltd [PDF, 160 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 7 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v JDFoods Ltd (Oral Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 28 January 2021) APPLICATION TO DISCHARGE FREEZING ORDER – parties to give further evidence – refined freezing order made.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 6 JKL v Stirling Andersen Ltd [PDF, 114 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 6 JKL v Stirling Andersen Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 24 January 2022) APPLICATION FOR NON-PUBLICATION ORDER – determination contains information relating to domestic violence abuse – non-publication order granted – Authority determinations to remove identifying details.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 5 VMR v Civil Aviation Authority [PDF, 519 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 5 VMR v Civil Aviation Authority (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 24 January 2022) APPLICATION FOR INTERIM REINSTATEMENT – weakly arguable case for unjustifiable dismissal – weakly arguable case for permanent reinstatement – employing unvaccinated workers likely to be in breach of COVID-19 Public Health Response (Vaccinations) Order 2021 – reinstatement would not be appropriate if it would lead to a breach by the employer – balance of convenience weighs against interim reinstatement – application declined - APPLICATION FOR INTERIM NON-PUBLICATION – non-publication granted in other jurisdictions – significant public interest in mandatory vaccinations – application granted.