[2022] NZEmpC 129 Teddy and Friends Ltd v Page (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 20 July 2022) PERSONAL GRIEVANCE – RAISING THE GRIEVANCE – correspondence was sufficiently detailed to raise a grievance before 90-day period expired – challenge dismissed.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3630 items matching your search terms
-
[2022] NZEmpC 129 Teddy and Friends Ltd v Page [PDF, 238 KB] -
[2022] NZEmpC 128 Straayer v Employment Relations Authority [PDF, 243 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 128 Straayer v Employment Relations Authority (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 19 July 2022) CHALLENGE TO OBJECTION TO DISCLOSURE – document is partly privileged – document to be disclosed with privileged parts redacted.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 127 VMR v Aviation Security Service Division of Civil Aviation Authority [PDF, 304 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 127 VMR v Aviation Security Service Division of Civil Aviation Authority (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 18 July 2022) APPLICATIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO REMOVE MATTERS TO EMPLOYMENT COURT – COVID-19 vaccinations – important question of law likely to arise other than incidentally – applications granted.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 126 Henderson Travels Ltd v Kaur [PDF, 194 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 126 Henderson Travels Ltd v Kaur (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Judge K G Smith, 15 July 2022) APPLICATIONS FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS – application cannot be made by a plaintiff – employee impecuniosity caused by allegedly unjustifiable dismissal - security for costs would not be just against the employee in the circumstances – company has financial support – insufficient evidence that it would be unable to pay future costs award – applications dismissed.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 125 Atlas Concrete Ltd v Cleland [PDF, 143 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 125 Atlas Concrete Ltd v Cleland (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 14 July 2022) APPLICATION FOR STAY - consent.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 124 Pilgrim v Attorney-General [PDF, 176 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 124 Pilgrim v Attorney-General (Interlocutory Judgment (No 4) of Judge B A Corkill, 13 July 2022) APPLICATION FOR IN-COURT MEDIA COVERAGE - matter is in the public interest - applicants will comply with relevant guidelines - application granted.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 123 CSN v Royal District Nursing Service NZ Ltd [PDF, 376 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 123 CSN v Royal District Nursing Service New Zealand Ltd (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 11 July 2022) DECLARATION – ss 5 and 6 Employment Relations Act 2000 – COVID-19 Public Health Response (Vaccinations) Order 2021 – CSN was not a care and support worker under the Vaccinations Order – CSN remained employee for relevant period – CSN also a homeworker – declaration accordingly – NON-PUBLICATION – permanent non-publication of name and identifying details of plaintiff, brother and son.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 122 Reunited Employees Assoc Inc v Nelmac Ltd [PDF, 223 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 122 Reunited Employees Assoc Inc v Nelmac Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 8 July 2022) APPLICATION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS – respondent is unlikely to be able to satisfy a future costs order if challenge unsuccessful – ordering security for costs may have effect of ending litigation – such an order would not be in interests of justice – application dismissed.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 121 Matajod v Crazy Horse Ltd [PDF, 41 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 121 Matajod v Crazy Horse Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 8 July 2022) APPLICATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING A NOTICE OF OPPOSITION – it would be inconsistent with interests of justice not to hear from defendant – application granted.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 120 Smiths City (Southern) Ltd (in receivership) v Claxton [PDF, 273 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 120 Smiths City (Southern) Ltd (in receivership) v Claxton (Costs Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 6 July 2022) COSTS – GUIDELINE SCALE – appropriate costs category is 2B – Calderbank offer justifies uplift – costs awarded for Authority proceedings – costs awarded on costs.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 119 H v Employment Relations Authority [PDF, 175 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 119 H v Employment Relations Authority (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Judge K G Smith, 5 July 2022) COSTS – GUIDELINE SCALE – uplift appropriate because of steps taken by H – costs awarded.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 118 New Zealand Post Primary Teachers’ Association v Board of Trustees for Rodney College [PDF, 519 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 118 New Zealand Post Primary Teachers’ Association v Board of Trustees for Rodney College (Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 4 July 2022) CHALLENGE – DISPUTE – application and interpretation of collective agreement – “not open for instruction” means before 8.30 am and after 4.30 pm on days during school term, on weekends, public holidays, Easter Tuesday and vacations – challenge allowed – post-primary teachers.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 117 QDY v Counties Manukau District Health Board [PDF, 230 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 117 QDY v Counties Manukau District Health Board (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 4 July 2022) APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO REMOVE PROCEEDINGS – important question of law is likely to arise – vaccination cases are of public interest - no reason not to remove proceedings – application granted – non-publication order made.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 116 Solander Maritime Ltd v Munro [PDF, 158 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 116 Solander Maritime Ltd v Munro (Interlocutory Judgment (No 3) of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 29 June 2022) APPLICATION FOR CONTINUATION OF FREEZING ORDER - consent.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 115 Kowhai Intermediate School Board of Trustees [PDF, 239 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 115 Kowhai Intermediate School Board of Trustees (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 28 June 2022) APPLICATION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION - challenge will face difficulties - respondent may have difficulty paying back remedies - stay ordered with conditions.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 114 STL Linehaul Ltd v Waters [PDF, 204 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 114 STL Linehaul Ltd v Waters (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 28 June 2022) PERSONAL GRIEVANCE – REDUNDANCY – redundancy was not substantively justified – procedural issues – dismissal was unjustifiable – compensation awarded in the bottom half of Band 2 – no deduction for contribution – Authority costs award unchanged.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 112 Shaw v Bay of Plenty District Health Board [PDF, 220 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 112 Shaw v Bay of Plenty District Health Board (Costs Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 28 June 2022) COSTS – GUIDELINE SCALE – respondent has limited means – uplift warranted for amended pleadings requiring further attendances – costs awarded with uplift.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 113 Arohanui Hospice Service Trust v New Zealand Nurses Organisation [PDF, 148 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 113 Arohanui Hospice Service Trust v New Zealand Nurses Organisation (Consent Interlocutory Judgment of Judge J Kathryn Beck, 27 June 2022) APPLICATION FOR STAY - consent.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 111 Humphreys v Humphreys [PDF, 217 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 111 Humphreys v Humphreys (Interlocutory Judgment (No 3) of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 23 June 2022) APPLICATION TO ACCESS COURT DOCUMENTS - formal court record is accessible to the public - access to other documents will not assist for applicant's purposes - substantive hearing is not in progress - application declined.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 110 Fleming v Attorney-General [PDF, 216 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 110 Fleming v Attorney-General (Interlocutory Judgment (No 5) of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 23 June 2022) APPLICATION TO ACCESS COURT DOCUMENTS - formal court record is accessible to the public - access to other documents will not assist for applicant's purposes - substantive hearing is not in progress - application declined.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 109 Wilson-Grange Investments T/A The Grange Bar and Restaurant [PDF, 188 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 109 Wilson-Grange Investments T/A The Grange Bar and Restaurant (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 23 June 2022) APPLICATION FOR STAY - no evidence of challenge being rendered ineffectual - balance of convenience does not favour granting stay - application declined.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 108 Saipe v Bethell [PDF, 170 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 108 Saipe v Bethell (Costs Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 21 June 2022) COSTS - GUIDELINE SCALE - calculation overstated costs - financial circumstances considered.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 106 Soapi v Pick Hawke’s Bay Inc [PDF, 209 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 106 Soapi v Pick Hawke’s Bay Inc (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 21 June 2022) APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO REMOVE MATTER TO THE COURT - several questions of law - questions are important both to the parties and to the wider workforce - no reason to decline removal - application granted.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 107 JKL v Stirling Andersen Ltd [PDF, 272 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 107 JKL v Stirling Andersen Ltd (Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 20 June 2022) CHALLENGE - Authority was correct not to recall determination - non-publication order could have been made without recall - Authority made a determination about non-publication that can be challenged - applicant is vulnerable - non-publication appropriate - name suppression and non-publication ordered.
-
[2022] NZEmpC 105 Mende Biotech Ltd v Mende [PDF, 144 KB] [2022] NZEmpC 105 Mende Biotech Ltd v Mende (Consent Interlocutory Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 20 June 2022) APPLICATION FOR STAY - consent.