You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.

Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Search results

3418 items matching your search terms

  1. [2021] NZEmpC 198 Head v Chief Executive of the Inland Revenue Department [PDF, 388 KB]

    [2021] NZEmpC 198 Head v Chief Executive of the Inland Revenue Department (Costs Judgment of the full Court, 17 November 2021) COSTS – applications for costs by first and second defendants – first defendant sought two-thirds of actual and reasonable costs – second defendant sought guideline scale – HELD – complex proceeding – several interlocutory judgments – guideline scale did not recognise sufficiently the significant attendances – degree of importance associated with the proceeding but not a test case – two-thirds of actual and reasonable costs awarded to first defendant with deductions to recognise access to justice, matter of importance, overlap – scale costs awarded to second defendant with deduction to recognise overlap – applications granted.

  2. [2021] NZEmpC 197 Mikes Transport Warehouse Ltd v Vermuelen [PDF, 245 KB]

    [2021] NZEmpC 197 Mikes Transport Warehouse Ltd v Vermuelen (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 17 November 2021) PERSONAL GRIEVANCE – UNJUSTIFIABLE DISMISSAL – employee unequivocally resigned – a “cooling off” period is not required for an unequivocal resignation – employee was not unjustifiably dismissed from Mikes Transport Warehouse – not assisting employee with visa issues in role with related company was unjustifiable – employee was unjustifiably dismissed – remedies awarded.

  3. [2021] NZEmpC 187 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v Samra Holdings Ltd T/A Te Puna Liquor Centre [PDF, 278 KB]

    [2021] NZEmpC 187 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v Samra Holdings Ltd T/A Te Puna Liquor Centre (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 2 November 2021) APPLICATION TO ADJOURN A HEARING – hearing cannot be held in person – respondent would be prejudiced by not being able to appear – hearing adjourned.