You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.

Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Search results

3418 items matching your search terms

  1. [2022] NZEmpC 190 Te Whatu Ora – Health New Zealand v Culturesafe NZ Ltd (in liq) [PDF, 252 KB]

    [2022] NZEmpC 190 Te Whatu Ora – Health New Zealand v Culturesafe NZ Ltd (in liq) (Interlocutory Judgment (No 5) of Judge B A Corkill, 25 October 2022) PROTEST TO JURISDICTION - whether proceedings removed were a "matter" under s 187 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 - broad meaning must be given to the term "matter" - Court has jurisdiction after matter was properly removed - protest to jurisdiction dismissed.

  2. [2022] NZEmpC 184 Straayer v Employment Relations Authority [PDF, 329 KB]

    [2022] NZEmpC 184 Straayer v Employment Relations Authority (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 17 October 2022) APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT JUDICIAL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS - Employment Relations Act contains only one path for judicial review applications - judicial review is only available after Authority has published substantive determination that has been challenged - Authority has not published determination - judicial review cannot succeed - application for strike-out granted.

  3. [2022] NZEmpC 183 Butt v Attorney-General [PDF, 372 KB]

    [2022] NZEmpC 183 Butt v Attorney-General (Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 12 October 2022) SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT – MISREPRESENTATION – CANCELLATION – plaintiff sought to cancel settlement agreement for misrepresentation – defendant made misrepresentation to plaintiff – plaintiff relied on misrepresentation – plaintiff induced by representation to sign agreement – parties did not explicitly or implicitly agree that the truth of the representation was essential – misrepresentation substantially reduced the benefit of the contract to the plaintiff – plaintiff entitled to cancel contract – plaintiff entitled to proceed with claim.

  4. [2022] NZEmpC 177 Shah Enterprise IT Ltd v A Labour Inspector [PDF, 240 KB]

    [2022] NZEmpC 177 Shah Enterprise IT Ltd v A Labour Inspector of Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 23 September 2022) MINIMUM STANDARDS – employee is owed minimum wages and holiday pay – company director was person involved in minimum wage and holiday pay breaches – company director is liable if company fails to pay amounts owing – PENALTIES – Preet and statutory factors considered – $19,200 in penalties awarded against company - $9,600 in penalties awarded against director.

  5. [2022] NZEmpC 174 Ashby v NIWA Vessel Management Ltd [PDF, 279 KB]

    [2022] NZEmpC 174 Ashby v NIWA Vessel Management Ltd (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 21 September 2022) NON-DE NOVO CHALLENGE - REMEDIES - but for personal grievance employee may have remained with employer for some time - 12 months' lost wages awarded - evidence suggested that dismissal had a significant mental impact - compensation awarded at top end of Band 2 - employee was not blameworthy in grievance - no reduction made for contribution.

  6. [2022] NZEmpC 171 Alkazaz v Deloitte (No. 3) Ltd [PDF, 356 KB]

    [2022] NZEmpC 171 Alkazaz v Deloitte (No. 3) Ltd (Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 15 September 2022) SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT – no evidence of threat or illegitimate pressure to sign settlement agreement, nor of coercion or duress – settlement agreement not set aside – settlement agreement prevents new claims from being brought – employees made comments that breached settlement agreement – employees were not aware of the existence of the settlement agreement and their acts could not be imputed to the company – settlement agreement was not breached.