You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.

Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Search results

3630 items matching your search terms

  1. [2023] NZEmpC 189 Pretorius v Board of Trustees of Taupo Intermediate School [PDF, 285 KB]

    [2023] NZEmpC 189 Pretorius v Board of Trustees of Taupo Intermediate School (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 3 November 2023) APPLICATION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS – reason to believe plaintiff would not be able to pay an award of costs – possibility that challenge would be prevented considered – modest security for costs ordered – APPLICATION FOR STAY OF AUTHORITY COSTS DETERMINATION – no basis for stay – application declined.

  2. [2023] NZEmpC 180 HelloWorld Travel Services (NZ) Ltd v Unsworth [PDF, 350 KB]

    [2023] NZEmpC 180 HelloWorld Travel Services (NZ) Ltd v Unsworth (Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 25 October 2023) UNJUSTIFIABLE DISMISSAL – REDUNDANCY – NON-DE NOVO CHALLENGE - Authority was correct in finding that redundancy process was unfair and decision was predetermined – flaws were not minor or inconsequential – dismissal was unjustifiable – redundancy compensation did not impact appropriate remedies - Authority did not make error in determination of remedies.

  3. [2023] NZEmpC 179 Pyne v Invacare New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 255 KB]

    [2023] NZEmpC 179 Pyne v Invacare New Zealand Ltd (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 25 October 2023) NON-DE NOVO CHALLENGE - REMEDIES - employee was unemployed for a significant period despite attempts at mitigation - 6 months' lost wages awarded - Authority's compensation award insufficiently explained - banding approach applied – - no reduction made for contribution – recommendation does not need to be made - PENALTY FOR BREACH OF GOOD FAITH – egregious bad faith is not required to award a penalty for breach of good faith – breach by the company was intended to undermine the employment relationship - $6,000 penalty awarded.

  4. [2023] NZEmpC 173 Pact Group v Robinson [PDF, 334 KB]

    [2023] NZEmpC 173 Pact Group v Robinson (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 5 October 2023) UNJUSTIFIABLE DISMISSAL – serious misconduct – GPS records relied upon in disciplinary process – employer failed to consider and engage with employee’s cultural concerns – higher standard for well-resourced employer – unfair disciplinary process and failings were not minor – not fair and reasonable to reach that conclusion – procedurally and substantively unjustified – lost wages and compensation for hurt and humiliation and lost benefit awarded.

  5. [2023] NZEmpC 168 AJY v Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections [PDF, 545 KB]

    [2023] NZEmpC 168 AJY v Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections (Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 3 October 2023) DISADVANTAGE – BULLYING – employee made bullying complaint – employer breached bullying policy by not responding appropriately – employee disadvantaged – DISADVANTAGE – CONSULTATION – employer moved employee to new position without consultation – failure to consult breached legislation and collective agreement – failure to consult employee disadvantaged them – DISMISSAL – employer failed to investigate fairly – employer did not fairly consider medical evidence – employer did not fairly consider other options to dismissal – employee unjustifiably dismissed substantively and procedurally – REMEDIES – no reinstatement ordered – compensation and lost wages ordered – reductions made for contribution – NON-PUBLICATION – non-publication orders made – parts of judgment redacted.