Polzleitner & Zink v WWW Media Ltd
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3599 items matching your search terms
-
[2012] NZEmpC 105 Polzleitner & Zink v WWW Media Ltd [PDF, 44 KB] -
[2012] NZEmpC 106 Simon Edwards v Two Degrees Mobile Limited [PDF, 51 KB] [2012] NZEmpC 106 Simon Edwards v Two Degrees Mobile Limited - interlocutory judgment.
-
[2012] NZEmpC 104 Ong & Ong t/a Pharmacy 72 v Massie - Interlocutory Judgment [PDF, 51 KB] Ong & Ong t/a Pharmacy 72 v Massie - Interlocutory Judgment
-
[2012] NZEmpC 103 Progressive Meats Ltd v Pohio and others [PDF, 135 KB] Progressive Meats Ltd v Pohio and others
-
[2012] NZEmpC 102 Tinkler v Fugro PMS Pty Ltd & Pavement Management Service [PDF, 100 KB] Tinkler v Fugro PMS Pty Ltd & Pavement Management Service
-
[2012] NZEmpC 109 Shelby Park Ltd v Blackie [PDF, 186 KB] Shelby Park Ltd v Blackie
-
[2012] NZCA 285 CA247/2012 New Zealand Cards Ltd v Ramsay [PDF, 96 KB] JUDGMENT OF THE COURT, 28 June 2012. Extension of time granted to seek leave to appeal from an EC decision finding NZCL liable to R for $12,880 for unjustifiable dismissal.Question of law on whether the facts found by the Employment Court judgment amount to a constructive dismissal on the basis of the duty of good faith, s 4(1A).Application for stay of execution of the judgment adjourned for further consideration on conditions.
-
[2012] NZEmpC 101 Pottinger & Nine Dot consulting Ltd v Carew and Kelly Services (NZ) Ltd [PDF, 250 KB] Pottinger & Nine Dot consulting Ltd v Carew and Kelly Services (NZ) Ltd
-
[2012] NZEmpC 100 Maritime Union of NZ v Posts of Auckland Ltd [PDF, 39 KB] Maritime Union of NZ v Posts of Auckland Ltd
-
[2012] NZEmpC 98 Kelleher v Wiri Pacific Ltd [PDF, 72 KB] Kelleher v Wiri Pacific Ltd
-
[2012] NZEmpC 99 Maori Hill and Balmacewen Pharmacy Ltd [PDF, 57 KB] Maori Hill and Balmacewen Pharmacy Ltd
-
[2012] NZEmpC 97 Doran v Crest Commercial Cleaning Ltd [PDF, 224 KB] Doran v Crest Commercial Cleaning Ltd
-
[2012] NZEmpC 96 South Pacific Meats Ltd v Mohammed [PDF, 238 KB] South Pacific Meats Ltd v Mohammed
-
[2012] NZCA 254 CA150/2012 White v Reserve Bank [PDF, 36 KB] Leave to appeal is granted, 15 June 2012. Did the Employment Court fail to apply orthodox interpretation principles by failing to take into account the words “unless otherwise agreed in writing” in the applicants’ employment contracts and by failing to consider what was implicit in those words against the background of past dealings and the obligations of good faith that arise in the context of an employment contract? If yes, was the respondent required periodically to review the percentage of the total remuneration package that was deemed to be superable salary and to adjust the percentage having regard to the material revealed by the review?
-
[2012] NZEmpC 94 Gini v Literacy Training Ltd [PDF, 93 KB] Gini v Literacy Training Ltd
-
[2012] NZEmpC 90 Walker v Procare Health Ltd [PDF, 313 KB] Walker v Procare Health Ltd
-
[2012] NZEmpC 93 Marshment v Shaeppard Industries Ltd [PDF, 74 KB] Marshment v Shaeppard Industries Ltd
-
[2012] NZEmpC 95 Strachan v Moodie [PDF, 323 KB] Strachan v Moodie
-
[2012] NZEmpC 91 Ball v Healthcare of NZ Ltd [PDF, 132 KB] Ball v Healthcare of NZ Ltd
-
[2012] NZEmpC 92 Kaipara v Carter Holt Harvey Ltd [PDF, 155 KB] Kaipara v Carter Holt Harvey Ltd
-
[2012] NZEmpC 89 Munro v NZ Security Ltd, Formerly known as Hibiscus Coast Security Ltd [PDF, 44 KB] Munro v NZ Security Ltd, Formerly known as Hibiscus Coast Security Ltd
-
[2012] NZEmpC 88 NZ Air Line Pilots' Assn Inc v Air NZ Ltd [PDF, 156 KB] NZ Air Line Pilots' Assn Inc v Air NZ Ltd
-
[2012] NZEmpC 87 Haig v Edgewater Developers & Ors [PDF, 55 KB] Haig v Edgewater Developers & Ors
-
[2012] NZEmpC 86 Lend Lease Infrastructure Services (NZ) Ltd v Recreational Services Ltd [PDF, 147 KB] Lend Lease Infrastructure Services (NZ) Ltd v Recreational Services Ltd
-
[2012] NZEmpC 85 Patel v Pegasus Stations Ltd [PDF, 46 KB] Patel v Pegasus Stations Ltd