Service and Food Workers Union Nga Ringa Tota Inc v Terranova Homes and Care Ltd
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3638 items matching your search terms
-
[2013] NZEmpC 51Service and Food Workers Union Nga Ringa Tota Inc v Terranova Homes and Care Ltd [PDF, 60 KB] -
[2013] NZEmpC 49 de Bruin v Canterbury District Health Board [PDF, 62 KB] de Bruin v Canterbury District Health Board
-
[2013] NZEmpC 48 Wareing v Tyco New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 76 KB] Wareing v Tyco New Zealand Ltd
-
[2013] NZEmpC 47 Dell v ABC01 Ltd (formerly Primary Heart Care Ltd) [PDF, 57 KB] Dell v ABC01 Ltd (formerly Primary Heart Care Ltd) - oral interlocutory judgment no 3 of Chief Judge G L Colgan.
-
[2013] NZEmpC 46 Aarts v Barnardos & Ors [PDF, 49 KB] Aarts v Barnardos & Ors
-
[2013] NZEmpC 45 Alim v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd [PDF, 71 KB] Alim v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd
-
[2013] NZEmpC 44 South Pacific Ltd v Tian [PDF, 71 KB] South Pacific Ltd v Tian
-
[2013] NZEmpC 43 Snowdon v Radio New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 51 KB] Snowdon v Radio New Zealand Ltd - inerlocutory judgment of Judge A D Ford.
-
[2013] NZEmpC 39 Rittson-Thomas t/a Totara Hills Farm v Davidson [PDF, 150 KB] Rittson- Thomas t/a Totara Hills Farm v Davidson - judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan.
-
[2013] NZEmpC 40 B v Virgin Australia (NZ) Employment & Crewing Ltd [PDF, 356 KB] B v Virgin Australia (NZ) Employment & Crewing Ltd
-
[2013] NZEmpC 41 Coverall Cleaning Concepts NZ Ltd v Atkinson [PDF, 71 KB] Coverall Cleaning Concepts NZ Ltd v Atkinson
-
[2013] NZEmpC 42 New Zealand Merchant Service Guild IUOW Inc v Holcim (NZ) Ltd [PDF, 126 KB] New Zealand Merchant Service Guild IUOW Inc v Holcim (NZ) Ltd
-
[2013] NZEmpC 38 Taiapa v Te Runanga O Turanganui A Kiwa Trust t/a Turanga Ararau Private Training Establishment [PDF, 117 KB] Taiapa v Te Runanga O Turanganui A Kiwa Trust t/a Turanga Ararau Private Training Establishment - judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan.
-
[2013] NZEmpC 37 Dell v ABC01 Ltd (formerly Primary Heart Care Ltd) [PDF, 61 KB] Dell v ABC01 Ltd (formerly Primary Heart Care Ltd) - oral interlocutory judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan.
-
[2013] NZEmpC 34 Baker v St John Central Regional Trust Board [PDF, 102 KB] Baker v St John Central Regional Trust Board
-
[2013] NZEmpC 36 Detection Services Ltd v Pickering [PDF, 139 KB] Detection Services Ltd v Pickering
-
[2013] NZEmpC 33 Mayne v Polychem Marketing Limited [PDF, 166 KB] Mayne v Polychem Marketing Limited
-
[2013] NZSC 15 SC91/2012 New Zealand Post Limited v Postal Workers Union of Aotearoa Incorporated and L Street [PDF, 58 KB] JUDGMENT OF THE COURT, 13 March 2013. Application for leave to appeal is denied. Since the Employment Court and Court of Appeal judgments, s 9(3) of the Holidays Act 2003 was repealed and replaced with the new s 9A. As such, the Supreme Court held that the correct interpretation of s 9(1) in relation to s 9(3) was principally only of historical interest, and that the question of how s 9(1) interests with the new s 9A should only be determined if and when issues arise as to their application. The case therefore did not give rise to any question of public or general importance.
-
[2013] NZEmpC 32 Piefection Foods Ltd v Hume [PDF, 133 KB] Piefection Foods Ltd v Hume
-
[2013] NZEmpC 60 Snowdon v Radio New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 236 KB] Snowdon v Radio New Zealand Ltd - interlocutory judgment of Judge B S Travis.
-
[2013] NZEmpC 31 Turner v Talley’s Group Limited [PDF, 196 KB] Turner v Talley’s Group Limited
-
[2013] NZEmpC 30 Looker v AG Walter & Sons Ltd [PDF, 119 KB] Looker v AG Walter & Sons Ltd
-
[2013] NZEmpC 29 Brightwater Engineers Ltd v Arrowsmith [PDF, 121 KB] Brightwater Engineers Ltd v Arrowsmith
-
[2013] NZEmpC 28 Maori Hill & Balmacewen Pharmacy Ltd v O’Sullivan [PDF, 205 KB] Maori Hill & Balmacewen Pharmacy Ltd v O’Sullivan
-
[2013] NZEmpC 27 Hall v Dionex Pty Ltd [PDF, 109 KB] [2013] NZEmpC27 ARC 66/12 Hall v Dionex Pty Ltd - Judgment. Successful application for special leave to remove proceeding to the Court. Court agreed important question of law regarding delegation or outsourcing of disciplinary decision-making to person not employee, director or officer of employer would arise. Court satisfied it had residual discretion to decline removal but ordered removal in this case.