B v Virgin Australia (NZ) Employment & Crewing Ltd
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3609 items matching your search terms
-
[2013] NZEmpC 40 B v Virgin Australia (NZ) Employment & Crewing Ltd [PDF, 356 KB] -
[2013] NZEmpC 41 Coverall Cleaning Concepts NZ Ltd v Atkinson [PDF, 71 KB] Coverall Cleaning Concepts NZ Ltd v Atkinson
-
[2013] NZEmpC 42 New Zealand Merchant Service Guild IUOW Inc v Holcim (NZ) Ltd [PDF, 126 KB] New Zealand Merchant Service Guild IUOW Inc v Holcim (NZ) Ltd
-
[2013] NZEmpC 38 Taiapa v Te Runanga O Turanganui A Kiwa Trust t/a Turanga Ararau Private Training Establishment [PDF, 117 KB] Taiapa v Te Runanga O Turanganui A Kiwa Trust t/a Turanga Ararau Private Training Establishment - judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan.
-
[2013] NZEmpC 37 Dell v ABC01 Ltd (formerly Primary Heart Care Ltd) [PDF, 61 KB] Dell v ABC01 Ltd (formerly Primary Heart Care Ltd) - oral interlocutory judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan.
-
[2013] NZEmpC 34 Baker v St John Central Regional Trust Board [PDF, 102 KB] Baker v St John Central Regional Trust Board
-
[2013] NZEmpC 36 Detection Services Ltd v Pickering [PDF, 139 KB] Detection Services Ltd v Pickering
-
[2013] NZEmpC 33 Mayne v Polychem Marketing Limited [PDF, 166 KB] Mayne v Polychem Marketing Limited
-
[2013] NZSC 15 SC91/2012 New Zealand Post Limited v Postal Workers Union of Aotearoa Incorporated and L Street [PDF, 58 KB] JUDGMENT OF THE COURT, 13 March 2013. Application for leave to appeal is denied. Since the Employment Court and Court of Appeal judgments, s 9(3) of the Holidays Act 2003 was repealed and replaced with the new s 9A. As such, the Supreme Court held that the correct interpretation of s 9(1) in relation to s 9(3) was principally only of historical interest, and that the question of how s 9(1) interests with the new s 9A should only be determined if and when issues arise as to their application. The case therefore did not give rise to any question of public or general importance.
-
[2013] NZEmpC 32 Piefection Foods Ltd v Hume [PDF, 133 KB] Piefection Foods Ltd v Hume
-
[2013] NZEmpC 60 Snowdon v Radio New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 236 KB] Snowdon v Radio New Zealand Ltd - interlocutory judgment of Judge B S Travis.
-
[2013] NZEmpC 31 Turner v Talley’s Group Limited [PDF, 196 KB] Turner v Talley’s Group Limited
-
[2013] NZEmpC 30 Looker v AG Walter & Sons Ltd [PDF, 119 KB] Looker v AG Walter & Sons Ltd
-
[2013] NZEmpC 29 Brightwater Engineers Ltd v Arrowsmith [PDF, 121 KB] Brightwater Engineers Ltd v Arrowsmith
-
[2013] NZEmpC 28 Maori Hill & Balmacewen Pharmacy Ltd v O’Sullivan [PDF, 205 KB] Maori Hill & Balmacewen Pharmacy Ltd v O’Sullivan
-
[2013] NZEmpC 27 Hall v Dionex Pty Ltd [PDF, 109 KB] [2013] NZEmpC27 ARC 66/12 Hall v Dionex Pty Ltd - Judgment. Successful application for special leave to remove proceeding to the Court. Court agreed important question of law regarding delegation or outsourcing of disciplinary decision-making to person not employee, director or officer of employer would arise. Court satisfied it had residual discretion to decline removal but ordered removal in this case.
-
[2013] NZEmpC 26 Hegedus v Actronic Ltd [PDF, 102 KB] [2013] NZEmpC 26 ARC 73/12 Hegedus v Actronic Limited - Judgment. Unsuccessful application for leave to extend time for filing challenge. Delay not adequately explained, merits of challenge weak and applicant failed to diligently pursue claim.
-
[2013] NZEmpC 25 Gini v Literacy Training Ltd [PDF, 110 KB] Gini v Literacy Training Ltd
-
[2013] NZEmpC 24 Idea services Ltd v Barker [PDF, 120 KB] [2013] NZEmpC 24 Idea services Ltd v Barker. Application for rehearing declined. Court did not consider this to be an appropriate case for the invocation of the Court's equity and good conscience jurisdiction.
-
[2013] NZEmpC 35 Tan v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd [PDF, 204 KB] Tan v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd
-
[2013] NZEmpC 23 Detection Services Ltd v Pickering [PDF, 39 KB] [2013] NZEmpC 23 ARC 56/12 Detection Services Ltd v Pickering and ARC 6/13 Detection Services Ltd v Pickering - Oral Interlocutory Judgment. Successful application for non-publication order by respondent in relation to financially sensitive affidavit evidence.
-
[2013] NZEmpC 22 Shaw v Schering-Plough Animal Health Ltd [PDF, 1.5 MB] [2013] NZEmpC 22 Shaw v Schering-Plough Animal Health Ltd (Judgment of Judge AD Ford dated 25 February 2013) Successful challenge to the Authority determination. The Court held that the plaintiff was unjustifiably constructively dismissed. Plaintiff awarded $20,000 compensation for humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to feelings. Leave reserved to seek further directions or orders from the Court in relation to the quantification of the plaintiff's economic loss claim. Costs reserved.
-
[2013] NZEmpC 21 Grocott t/a Fluffys Roof Coatings v Parratt [PDF, 50 KB] [2013] NZEmpC 21 Grocott t/a Fluffys Roof Coatings v Parratt (Judgment of Judge A A Couch) Successful application to strike out proceedings for want of prosecution.
-
[2013] NZEmpC 20 NZPPTA & Gray v Secretary for Education & Cambridge High School [PDF, 64 KB] [2013] NZEmpC 20 NZPPTA & Gray v Secretary for Education & Cambridge High School (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge AD Ford) Successful interlocutory application by the defendants for leave to file a second amended statement of defence and to call the proposed evidence of Mr Tarr.
-
[2013] NZEmpC 18 Pathways Health Ltd v Moxon [PDF, 112 KB] [2013] NZEmpC 18 Pathways Health Ltd v Moxon. Unsuccessful challenge and cross-challenge to Authority costs determination. Plaintiff ordered to pay the defendant $15,000 for costs and $683.32 for disbursements.