NZ Meatworkers & Related Trades Union Inc v Alliance Groups Ltd [2015] NZEmpC 16 (Costs Judgment of Judge A A Couch, 11 February 2015) COSTS – costs claimed by successful party not reasonable – two-thirds of reasonable costs – end of line of test cases on impact on collective agreements of Holidays Act 2007 amendments, so not in category of ‘test case’.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3642 items matching your search terms
-
[2015] NZEmpC 16 NZ Meatworkers & Related Trades Union Inc v Alliance Groups Ltd [PDF, 96 KB] -
[2015] NZEmpC 12 Kenmare v Fulton Hogan Ltd [PDF, 44 KB] Kenmare v Fulton Hogan Ltd [2015] NZEmpC 12 (Consent Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 10 February, 2015) CONSENT AGREEMENT – Authority determination set aside – consent memorandum subject to non-publication order
-
[2015] NZEmpC 10 Graeme’s Service Centre v Stalker [PDF, 110 KB] Graeme’s Service Centre v Stalker [2015] NZEmpC 10 (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 10 February 2015) APPLICATION FOR STAY – sum transferred by plaintiff to solicitor trust account – principles for application for stay set out – stay granted - order to transfer amount to Registrar of the Employment Court.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 11 Lyttelton Port Company Ltd v The Rail and Maritime Transport Union and Ors [PDF, 23 KB] Lyttelton Port Company Ltd v The Rail and Maritime Transport Union [2015] NZEmpC 11 (Costs Judgment of Judge A A Couch, 10 February 2015) COSTS – TEST CASE – interpretation of collective agreement – in nature of test case – defendants gained substantial benefit from finding in their favour - defendants prolonged hearing on matter not seriously arguable – no order for costs.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 14 Allied Security Ltd v Guise [PDF, 40 KB] Allied Security Ltd v Guise [2015] NZEmpC 14 (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 10 February, 2015) STAY APPLICATION – parties by agreement paid into MBIE – amount transferred to Registrar of Employment Court.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 9 Premier Events Groups Ltd v Beattie [PDF, 55 KB] Premier Events Groups Ltd v Beattie [2015] NZEmpC 9 (Supplementary Judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 9 February 2015) REISSUE OF JUDGMENT – CORRECTION OF ERRORS – Two ‘accidental slips’ corrected under r 11.10 of the High Court Rules – original judgment reissued with corrections. [2015] NZEmpC 9 Premier Events Groups Ltd v Beattie supplementary [PDF, 55 KB]Premier Events Groups Ltd v Beattie [2015] NZEmpC 9 (Supplementary Judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 9 February 2015) REISSUE OF JUDGMENT – CORRECTION OF ERRORS – Two ‘accidental slips’ corrected under r 11.10 of the High Court Rules – original judgment reissued with corrections. [2015] NZEmpC 7 Alatipi v CE of the Department of Corrections [PDF, 280 KB][2015] NZEmpC 7 Alatipi v Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections (Judgment of Judge A D Ford, 5 February, 2015) UNJUSTIFIABLE DISMISSAL – REINSTATEMENT - claim against prison guard by prisoner – need for employer to have clear evidence – duty to act in good faith …
-
[2015] NZEmpC 8 Q v Commissioner of Police [PDF, 110 KB] Q v Commissioner of Police [2015] NZEmpC 8 (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 5 February 2015). IN CAMERA - NON-PUBLICATION ORDERS – Court has inherent jurisdiction to order in camera hearing – exceptional circumstances – principles for non-publication considered- orders granted – access to file limited
-
[2015] NZEmpC 7 Alatipi v CE of the Department of Corrections [PDF, 280 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 7 Alatipi v Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections (Judgment of Judge A D Ford, 5 February, 2015) UNJUSTIFIABLE DISMISSAL – REINSTATEMENT - claim against prison guard by prisoner – need for employer to have clear evidence – duty to act in good faith even where criminal investigation underway – could have waited til police investigation completed – evidence of pre-determination – remedies of reinstatement, remuneration & compensation ordered
-
[2015] NZEmpC 6 Edwards v Board of Trustees of Bay of Islands College [PDF, 821 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 6 Edwards v Board of Trustees of Bay of Islands College (Judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 3 February, 2015) UNJUSTIFIABLE DISMISSAL – REINSTATEMENT DENIED – REMUNERATION & COMPENSATION ORDERED - dismissal of principal – consideration of special factors in s103A assessment including implications for teaching professionals – employer’s resources considered – place of collective agreement – phenomenon of ‘mobbing’ discussed but not found – series of dysfunctional relationships - grounds for misconduct and serious misconduct not made out except in modest form – no grounds for loss of trust and confidence – support and guidance programme not followed through – compensation for non-pecuniary loss reduced for contribution
-
[2015] NZEmpC 13 Sai Systems Ltd v Bird [PDF, 57 KB] Sai Systems Ltd v Bird [2015] NZEmpC 13 (Costs Judgment of Judge A D Ford, 10 February 2015) COSTS ON INTERLOCUTORY JOINDER APPLICATION - substantive matter still before Authority – discussion of GST on costs – costs set in favour of defendant.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 5 Ritchies Transport Holdings Ltd v Merrenage interlocutory [PDF, 38 KB] Ritchies Transport Holdings Ltd v Merrenage interlocutory
-
[2015] NZEmpC 1 Hill v Workforce Development Ltd interlocutory [PDF, 82 KB] Hill v Workforce Development Ltd interlocutory
-
[2015] NZEmpC 4 Booth v Big Kahuna Holdings Ltd costs [PDF, 111 KB] Booth v Big Kahuna Holdings Ltd costs judgment of Judge Christina Inglis
-
[2015] NZEmpC 2 Tomo v Checkmate Precision Cutting Tools Ltd costs [PDF, 98 KB] Tomo v Checkmate Precision Cutting Tools Ltd costs
-
[2015] NZEmpC 3 Fletcher v Sharp Tudhope Lawyers costs [PDF, 73 KB] Fletcher v Sharp Tudhope Lawyers costs judgment of Judge Christina Inglis
-
[2014] NZEmpC 236 Lyttelton Port Co Ltd v Rail Maritime Transport Union Inc [PDF, 119 KB] Lyttelton Port Co Ltd v Rail Maritime Transport Union Inc
-
[2014] NZEmpC 233 Wills v Goodman Fielder NZ Ltd [PDF, 271 KB] Wills v Goodman Fielder NZ Ltd
-
[2014] NZEmpC 235 Rutherford Street Kindergarten v Chilton [PDF, 119 KB] Rutherford Street Kindergarten v Chilton
-
[2014] NZEmpC 232 Kenmare v Fulton Hogan Ltd costs [PDF, 57 KB] Kenmare v Fulton Hogan Ltd costs
-
[2014] NZEmpC 234 Mega Wreckers Ltd v Taafuli [PDF, 59 KB] Mega Wreckers Ltd v Taafuli, judgement of Judge A D Ford
-
[2014] NZEmpC 231 Premier Events Group Ltd and Anor v Beattie and Ors [PDF, 685 KB] Premier Events Group Ltd and Anor v Beattie and Ors
-
[2014] NZEmpC 230 D'Arcy-Smith v Natural Habitats Ltd [PDF, 94 KB] D'Arcy-Smith v Natural Habitats Ltd - interlocutory judgment no 3 of Chief Judge G L Colgan.
-
[2014] NZEmpC 229 Brown Sycamore v New Zealand Basing Limited of Hong Kong [PDF, 306 KB] [2014] NZEmpC 229 Brown Sycamore v New Zealand Basing Limited of Hong Kong (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill dated 15 December 2014) CONFLICT OF LAWS – Plaintiffs are pilots employed by Auckland-based subsidiary of Hong Kong-based airline – Employment agreements specify that the agreements are to be governed by law of Hong Kong – Hong Kong law provides no protections against age discrimination– Agreements specify age of retirement at 55 – Plaintiffs to turn 55 next year – Plaintiffs to be dismissed – Declarations sought that proposed actions are discriminatory under New Zealand law – Plaintiffs “based” in New Zealand and would therefore otherwise be subject to the provisions of the Employment Relations Act (ERA) – ERA an overriding statute by virtue of s 238 which prohibits contracting out – Express choice of Hong Kong law displaced – Express choice of Hong Kong law also contrary to New Zealand public policy which places an importance upon anti-discrimination values – Age discrimination …
-
[2014] NZEmpC 227 O’Hagan v Waitomo Adventures Ltd [PDF, 129 KB] O’Hagan v Waitomo Adventures Ltd [2014] NZEmpC 227 (Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 12 December 2014) STRIKE-OUT – SECURITY FOR COSTS – Application by plaintiff for setting aside of judgment on grounds of fraud – Defendant applies to strike-out proceedings – Questionable as to whether implied power to set aside displaced by Court’s statutory power of rehearing – Plaintiff’s application discloses no reasonably arguable cause of action – Proceedings struck-out – Were proceedings not struck-out Court would have made order for security for costs.
-
[2014] NZEmpC 228 SAI Systems Ltd v Bird [PDF, 46 KB] SAI Systems Ltd v Bird [2014] NZEmpC 228 (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge A D Ford, 12 December 2014) COSTS – Defendant seeks costs on plaintiff’s unsuccessful challenge – Matter in Authority part-heard – Plaintiff submitted that costs should be held-over pending final determination – Defendant entitled to costs on interlocutory matter – Timetable for submissions extended to meet availability of counsel