Thorne v Kiwirail Ltd, judgment of Judge A D Ford
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3630 items matching your search terms
-
[2015] NZEmpC 48 Thorne v Kiwirail Ltd [PDF, 144 KB] -
[2015] NZEmpC 47 SSO v NCE [PDF, 78 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 47 SSO v NCE (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 13 April 2015) ORDER FOR STAY - Orders staying execution of a determination of the Employment Relations Authority reinstating defendant in employment – interim non-publication order made - order for stay made by consent.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 46 Rutherford Street Kindergarten v Chilton [PDF, 92 KB] Rutherford Street Kindergarten v Chilton costs judgment of Judge B A Corkill
-
[2015] NZEmpC 45 Bracewell v Richmond Services Ltd [PDF, 88 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 45 Bracewell v Richmond Services Ltd (Recusal Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 10 April 2015) RECUSAL ORDER –rehearing on grounds that miscarriage of justice occurred and natural justice rights were breached – application for recusal in rehearing on grounds of alleged errors made in substantive judgment and alleged inequality given in relation to submissions and evidence of parties – Saxmere test for recusal considered – appropriate for tentative views to be expressed by Judge without it being indicative of pre-judgment – recusal declined.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 30 Wills v Goodman Fielder NZ Ltd costs [PDF, 99 KB] Wills v Goodman Fielder NZ Ltd costs, judgment of Judge B Corkill
-
[2015] NZEmpC 43 Harris v TSNZ Pulp and Paper Maintenance Ltd [PDF, 336 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 43 Harris v TSNZ Pulp and Paper Maintenance Ltd (Judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 2 April 2015) CALCULATION OF PAY FOR HOLIDAYS AND LEAVE DAYS – interpretation of collective agreement – whether allowances were to be incorporated into salary for calculation purposes. – whether new employer took on conditions negotiated in contract with previous employer – estoppel principles considered and applied– employee successful.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 44 Mana Coach Services Ltd v the New Zealand Tramways and Public Transport Employees Union [PDF, 401 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 44 Mana Coach Services Ltd v the New Zealand Tramways and Public Transport Employees Union (Judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 2 April 2015) EMPLOYER LIABILITY FOR UNION/EMPLOYEE BAD FAITH – drivers called off lawful strike too late for employer to cancel contingency arrangements – union demanded wages for drivers – applicability of principles in Miles case as directed by Court of Appeal – Wages Protection Act 1983 considered – bad faith disentitled employees to recover wages.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 40 Ritchies Transport v Merennage [PDF, 69 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 40 Ritchies Transport v Merennage (Consent Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 31 March 2015) CONSENT – application for leave to file amended statement of claim and stay.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 41 Denyer v Peter Reynolds Mechanical Ltd t/a The Italian Job Service Centre [PDF, 185 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 41 Denyer v Peter Reynolds Mechanical Ltd t/a The Italian Job Service Centre (Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 31 March 2015) APPLICATION FOR PENALTY – compliance order not complied with – defendant paid outstanding amount prior to hearing – factors to be weighed in determining penalty – quantum of fines surveyed – fine of $5,500 ordered.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 42 Makana Northland Ltd v Carney [PDF, 93 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 42 Makana Northland Ltd v Carney (Interlocutory judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 31 March 2015) SCOPE OF CHALLENGE – challenge to substantive determination out of time – supplementary determination may be challenged – plaintiff to amend statement of claim.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 39 Scarborough v Micron Security Products Ltd [PDF, 126 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 39 Scarborough v Micron Security Products (Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 30 March 2015) REDUNDANCY – UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – genuine redundancy but flawed process – no evidence to support compensation – reinstatement denied.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 38 Davis v Commissioner of Police [PDF, 109 KB] Davis v Commissioner of Police - judgment of Judge A D Ford.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 37 Gapuzan v Pratt Whitney Air NZ [PDF, 157 KB] Gapuzan v Pratt Whitney Air NZ [2015] NZEmpC 37(Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 26 March 2015) COSTS – question of costs awards made against bankrupt after adjudication – costs award upheld as contingent debt subject to final determination of High Court.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 36 Yan v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [PDF, 280 KB] Yan v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [2015] NZEmpC 36 (Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 24 March 2015) UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL– unsuccessful claim for unjustified dismissal –dismissed for performance issues – whether bias present – standards applying to performance management.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 35 Coy v Commissioner of Police [PDF, 592 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 35 Coy v Commissioner of Police (Judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 24 March 2015) CONSTRUCTIVE DISMISSAL - UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – justiciable scope of claims going back in time– law of constructive dismissal – claim for constructive dismissal not unsuccessful– s 122 applied - events over long period amounted to unjustified disadvantage.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 34 Rodkiss v Carter Holt Harvey Ltd [PDF, 349 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 34 Rodkiss v Carter Holt Harvey Ltd (Judgment of Judge A D Ford, 24 March 2015) CONSTRUCTIVE DISMISSAL – UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE - COSTS –claim for constructive dismissal – cross challenge on disadvantage grievances and cost award. Breach of duty by employer – resignation foreseeable consequence - constructive dismissal upheld.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 33 Rimene v Doherty [PDF, 73 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 33 Rimene v Doherty (Judgment of Judge A D Ford, 20 March 2015) UNPAID WAGES and HOLIDAY PAY - successful claim by plaintiff against former employer.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 32 Kevin McDonald and Assoc v Alan Johnson [PDF, 68 KB] Kevin Macdonald & Associates v Johnson [2015] NZEmpC 32 (Interlocutory Judgment by Consent of Judge M E Perkins, 18 March 2015) STAY OF ENFORCEMENT OF DETERMINATION – by consent.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 31 Judith Davidson v Stephen Kelly [PDF, 96 KB] Davidson v Kelly [2015] NZEmpC 31 (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 17 March 2015) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DEFENCE OUT OF TIME – granted – JSC recommended.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 29 Hall v Dionex Pty Ltd [PDF, 330 KB] Hall v Dionex Pty Ltd [2015] NZEmpC 29 (Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 13 March 2015). UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – successful challenge to dismissal – predetermined - authority of decision-maker questioned – counter-factual analysis required for compensation – reduced for contribution – breach of contract claim barred by s 113(1).
-
[2015] NZEmpC 26 Anderson v Oceania Group (NZ) Ltd [PDF, 64 KB] Anderson v Oceania Group (NZ) Ltd [2015] NZEmpC 26 (Consent Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 12 March 2015) CONSENT – terms agreed and confidential between parties.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 28 Stevens v Hapag-Lloyd (NZ) Ltd [PDF, 307 KB] Stevens v Hapag-Lloyd (NZ) Ltd [2015] NZEmpC 28 (Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 12 March 2015) UNJUSTIFIABLE DISMISSAL – COSTS CROSS-CHALLENGE – restructuring and redeployment – plaintiff sought redundancy – redeployment option not accepted - meaning of ‘reasonable’ alternative explored – plaintiff unsuccessful - weight to be given to Calderbank offer made in Authority – hardship not found – defendant successful.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 27 Croisilles Oysters Ltd v Kerr [PDF, 71 KB] Croisilles Oysters Ltd v Kerr [2015] NZEmpC 27 (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 11 March 2015) APPLICATION FOR STAY - consent by defendant – granted.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 25 PRI Flight Catering Ltd v Saha [PDF, 117 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 25 PRI Flight Catering Ltd v Saha (Judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 4 March 2015) COSTS – WITHDRAWAL OF PROCEEDINGS – application for indemnity costs denied – contribution to costs at mediation allowed.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 24 Lowe v Director-General of Health, Ministry of Health & Ors [PDF, 194 KB] Lowe v Director-General of Health [2015] NZEmpC 24 (Judgment of the full Court, 2 March 2015). DEFINITION OF HOMEWORKER – whether Carer Support workers providing relief care are homeworkers under s 6 - legislative framework considered – comparison with ECA 1991 challenge allowed.