You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.

Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Search results

3630 items matching your search terms

  1. [2024] NZEmpC 104 Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand v New Zealand Nurses Organisation Inc [PDF, 304 KB]

    [2024] NZEmpC 104 Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand v New Zealand Nurses Organisation Inc (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 13 June 2024) APPLICATION FOR  STRIKE OUT – legality of strike notice is moot because strike already occurred – no reason to exercise discretion to consider application despite mootness – proceedings struck out - APPLICATION FOR JOINDER – no joinder required because proceedings are struck out.

  2. [2024] NZEmpC 103 Carrington Resort Jade LP v Maheno (Interlocutory Judgment [PDF, 231 KB]

    [2024] NZEmpC 103 Carrington Resort Jade LP v Maheno (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge M S King, 13 June 2024) APPLICATION FOR STAY – no jurisdiction or basis for a stay – APPLICATION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS – concern that costs would not be able to be paid – security for costs ordered – GOOD FAITH REPORT – plaintiff failed to participate in Authority investigation – parameters of de novo challenge restricted.

  3. [2024] NZEmpC 93 Television New Zealand Ltd v E Tū Incorporated [PDF, 327 KB]

    [2024] NZEmpC 93 Television New Zealand Ltd v E Tū Incorporated (Judgment of Chief Judge Inglis, 31 May 2024) Catchwords: INTERPRETATION OF COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT – REDUNDANCY – collective agreement requires participation with union members beyond normal good faith consultation – employer did not comply with requirement to involve union members at developmental stage of decision making process – compliance order is appropriate in the circumstances – compliance order made.

  4. [2024] NZEmpC 85 Pacific Insulation Ltd v Lagera & Anor [PDF, 182 KB]

    [2024] NZEmpC 85 Pacific Insulation Ltd v Lagera & Anor (Reasons judgment of Judge JC Holden 21 May 2024) APPLICATION FOR FREEZING AND ANCILLARY ORDERS – good arguable case based on steps the respondents have taken to divert business from the applicant – assets within New Zealand – real risk that assets will be dissipated or moved overseas – balance of convenience and interests of justice favour orders being made – appropriate to accord application urgency and to proceed without notice – application granted.