Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd - Interlocutory Judgment no 14 of Chief Judge G L Colgan. APPLICATION FOR LEAVE to file an application for the recall of the Interlocutory Judgement (NO 12) issued 20 July 2015 is granted, but the application for recall is refused.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3640 items matching your search terms
-
[2015] NZ EmpC 119 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 100 KB] -
[2015] NZEmpC 118 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 233 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 118 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Limited - (Judgment of Chief Judge GL Colgan, 23 July 2015) CHALLENGE TO OBJECTION – OBJECTION TO ANSWERING INTERROGATORIES – relevance of documents considered – some of objections to interrogatories upheld – those relating to performance and dismissal overruled – proportionality re-emphasised – no new issues raised.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 115 Lever v Dick and Alexander interlocutory [PDF, 177 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 115 Lever v Dick and Alexander (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 20 July 2015) COMPLIANCE – LIABILITY OF TRUSTEE - plaintiffs as trustees personally liable – s 140(6) options raised in preparation for any continued default.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 116 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 79 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 116 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd - (Interlocutory Judgment (No 12) of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 20 July 2015) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FURTHER INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATIONS – declined.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 117 Phil’s Place Ltd v Kiwa Kiwa and Clark [PDF, 66 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 117 Phil’s Place Ltd v Kiwa Kiwa and Clark (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 20 July 2015) DISCONTINUANCE – CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT
-
[2015] NZEmpC 114 TGP v TFE and SDI and TDI [PDF, 154 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 114 TGP v TFE and SDI and TDI (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 16 July 2015) PROHIBITION ON PUBLICATION – principles underlying circumstances of non-publication at the Employment Court considered and applied – application successful.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 113 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 82 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 113 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd - (Interlocutory Judgment (No 11) of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 15 July 2015) APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT – declined – no change to duration of hearing.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 112 Vince Roberts Electrical v Carroll [PDF, 202 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 112 Vince Roberts Electrical v Carroll (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 14 July 2015) IDENTITY OF EMPLOYER – HOLIDAYS ACT – RAISING OF PERSONAL GRIEVANCE – whether liability was with company or individual – individual found to be liable on facts – when limitation should be applied to Holidays Act entitlements – time runs from end of employment – personal grievance – not raised sufficient for employer to address it – out of time.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 109 Wellington City Transport Limited t/a Go Wellington v NZ Tramways and Public Passenger Transport Employees Union [PDF, 142 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 109 Wellington City Transport Limited t/a “Go Wellington” v NZ Tramways and Public Passenger Transport Employees Union - (Judgment of Judge Ford, 13 July 2015) Issue of interpretation concerning calculation in relation to a retirement gratuity provision in collective employment agreement – Held, ordinary meaning adopted in relation to “week’s pay” – no need to incorporate additional words – challenge dismissed.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 110 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 74 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 110 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd - (Interlocutory Judgment (No 10) of Chief Judge G L Colgan,13 July 2015) APPLICATION FOR RECALL AND REISSUE OF JUDGMENT – plaintiff correctly identified an oversight in making orders – defendant’s affidavit has addressed the order that should have been made – unnecessary to recall and reissue.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 111 Sealord Group Ltd v Pickering [PDF, 65 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 111 Sealord Group Ltd v Pickering (Consent Judgment of Judge Ford, 13 July 2015) CONSENT APPLICATION – Parties jointly requested Court to make payment from monies held in Court – held, orders granted - money to be paid for lost remuneration – money to be paid for compensation for hurt and humiliation – money to be paid in PAYE taxation on lost remuneration – remainder of funds to be held in Court’s interest-bearing account until final determination of costs
-
[2015] NZEmpC 131 Su v Zhang and iGolf Ltd [PDF, 79 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 131 Su v Zhang and iGolf Ltd (Holiday Pay and Costs Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 31 July 2015) HOLIDAY PAY- COSTS – holiday pay calculated based on Holidays Act plus interest – costs calculated on standard principles.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 108 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd [PDF, 102 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 108 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment No 9)
-
[2015] NZEmpC 105 Scarborough v Micron Security Products Limited costs [PDF, 233 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 105 Scarborough v Micron Security Products Limited (Costs Judgment Judge Christina Inglis, 3 July 2015) COSTS – UPLIFT – indemnity costs on two of four applications – uplift for re-litigation of matters already decided – aggravating factors and overall justice to successful party considered – costs on costs accepted – total $14,321.96.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 106 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 94 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 106 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd - (Interlocutory Judgment (No8) Chief Judge Colgan. LEAVE TO FILE INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATIONS – whether litigation privilege attaches to documents prepared for earlier litigation – leave to file granted – variation of earlier orders - refused - leave to file application for review of earlier judgment - granted
-
[2015] NZEmpC 107 Zespri International Ltd v Yu interlocutory [PDF, 146 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 107 Zespri International Ltd v Yu (Interlocutory Judgment (No 8( Chief Judge Colgan, 7 July 2015) COMPLIANCE ORDER – return of laptop – questions of confidentiality and ownership of documents to be managed – Authority’s order set aside – incremental process and specific conditions ordered.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 104 Shanmuganathan v PowerNet Ltd [PDF, 235 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 104 Shanmuganathan v PowerNet Ltd - (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 2 July 2015) PERSONAL GRIEVANCE - de novo challenge to determination of Employment Relations Authority – whether employer was justified in concluding there was serious misconduct warranting demotion – objective test applied regarding whether employer’s actions were what a fair and reasonable employer could have done in all the circumstances - entailed consideration of whether investigation was sufficient – whether employer’s concerns were raised prior to action being taken – whether there was reasonable opportunity given to employee to respond to concerns – whether there was genuine consideration given to the employee’s explanations for the conduct – held, fair and reasonable employer could not find that tabling of an offensive email in a meeting constituted serious misconduct although could conclude it was misconduct - decision that serious misconduct occurred warranting demotion was unjustified – order…
-
[2015] NZEmpC 102 Makana Northland Ltd v Carney [PDF, 53 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 102 Makana Northland Ltd v Carney - (Judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 1 July 2015) CONSENT – confidential settlement – terms not to be published – inspection only by leave of a Judge.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 103 Whanau Tahi Ltd v Dasari [PDF, 90 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 103 Whanau Tahi Ltd v Dasari (Judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 1 July 2015) LEAVE TO FILE OUT OF TIME – plaintiff and defendant each filed application and opposition to other party’s application – leave to file out of time granted to both.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 101 Georgetti v Compass Communications Ltd [PDF, 89 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 101 Georgetti v Compass Communications Ltd (Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 30 June 2015) LEAVE TO FILE CROSS-CHALLENGE OUT OF TIME – relevant factors considered – leave granted.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 100 IAG NZ Ltd v Boulger [PDF, 75 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 100 IAG NZ Ltd v Boulger (Interlocutory Judgment of Christina Inglis, 29 June 2015) COSTS – SEARCH ORDER – cost of removing data from files obtained through search order to be met by applicant – form of order regarding handling of files agreed – orders made accordingly.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 99 NZ Meat Workers Union Inc v South Pacific Meats Ltd [PDF, 249 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 99 NZ Meat Workers Union Inc v South Pacific Meats Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 25 June 2015). REFERRAL OF QUESTION OF LAW FROM EMPLOYMENT RELATONS AUTHORITY - Authority sought answer to whether it was empowered to make an order for disclosure of documents which may be self-incriminatory – issue as to whether that was a question of law referred under s177 of Employment Relations Act 2000 or a partial removal of the Authority’s substantive proceeding pursuant to s178 – Authority clarified it was seeking an answer to a question of law pursuant to s177 – whether there are any prohibitions to the referral under s177 - consideration around whether discovery of documents subject to privilege against self-incrimination related to procedure or jurisdiction - Held, question of law did not relate to Authority’s procedure - Authority’s powers set out in s160 include power to require documents from parties - application to strike out the referral declined, m…
-
[2015] NZEmpC 98 Premier Events Group Ltd Ors v Beattie [PDF, 160 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 98 Premier Events Group Ltd v Beattie (Interim Costs Judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 24 June 2015) COSTS – whether costs can be awarded in incomplete proceedings – costs reserved on successful breach of contract claims against defendant – unpaid remuneration to defendant a discrete matter and $10,000 costs awarded – costs to 2nd and 3rd plaintiffs also awarded - $15,000 and $10,000 respectively –costs reserved on other matters of liability where all causes of action not yet settled.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 96 Allied Security Ltd v Marriott interlocutory [PDF, 88 KB] Allied Security Ltd v Marriott interlocutory judgment of Judge B A Corkill
-
[2015] NZEmpC 95 Tony’s Tyre Service Ltd v Coulthard [PDF, 54 KB] Tony’s Tyre Service Ltd v Coulthard, judgment of B A Corkill