[2015] NZEmpC 139 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd - (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 10 August 2015) WITNESS SUMMONS – application to delay appearance – granted.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3640 items matching your search terms
-
[2015] NZEmpC 139 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 83 KB] -
[2015] NZEmpC 154 Parkinson v Opotiki Rose Garden Preschool Community Trust Inc [PDF, 12 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 154 Parkinson v Opotiki Rose Garden Preschool Community Trust Inc (Consent Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 10 September 2015) CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT – terms of resolution settled at Judicial Settlement Conference.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 137 Stevens v Hapag-Lloyd (NZ) Ltd costs [PDF, 173 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 137 Stevens v Hapag-Lloyd (NZ) Ltd (Costs Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 7 August 2015) COSTS – reasonable costs – uplifting factors – ongoing effect of offers to settle applied to costs at Employment Court – hardship and access to justice considered – payment by instalments rejected.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 138 NZ Meat Workers Union Inc v South Pacific Meats Ltd and Talley [PDF, 415 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 138 NZ Meat Workers Union Inc v South Pacific Meats Ltd and Talley (Judgment of Judge G L Colgan, 7 August 2015) AUTHORITY’S JURISDICTION –COMMON LAW RIGHT TO PENALTY PRIVILEGE –whether there is a residual common law privilege against self-incrimination in civil penalty proceedings – whether this exists at Authority - comparison of penalty privilege rights at Authority and Employment Court – penalty proceedings not criminal proceedings – reg 39(2) negates right to disclosure – can be determined by Court – - NZBORA s 27,29 considered – Evidence Act ss 60, 63 considered – privilege applies to corporations – two narrow self-incrimination privileges may be asserted at the Authority.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 136 Cronin-Lampe v The BOT of Melville High School interlocutory [PDF, 115 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 136 Cronin-Lampe v The BOT of Melville High School (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 6 August 2015) APPLICATION FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS OF PLEADINGS – particulars needed for relevance of Limitation Act – purpose of particulars considered- parameters of relevance need to be prescribed – statements of claim not sufficiently particularised – application granted.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 135 Fagotti v Acme & Co Ltd [PDF, 402 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 135 Fagotti v Acme & Co Ltd (Judgment of the Full Court, 5 August 2015) COSTS AT THE AUTHORITY – CALDERBANK OFFERS – INDEMNITY COSTS – GST – whether the Authority should be influenced by the circumstances and justice of a particular case in awarding costs – different principles apply in the Authority and the Court – daily tariff at Authority has value – GST issue left for future case – not a case for indemnity costs – challenge dismissed.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 134 Hungry Hound Ltd v Hayes [PDF, 162 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 134 Hungry Hound Ltd v Hayes - (Judgment of B A Corkill, 4 August 2015) UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – whether unjustifiably dismissed – whether entitled to remedies – delineation between casual and permanent part time employment discussed - Held, personal grievance established - compensation and costs awarded.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 132 Waterford Holdings Ltd v Morunga [PDF, 197 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 132 Waterford Holdings Ltd v Morunga - (Judgment of B A Corkill, 3 August 2015) UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – dismissal for serious misconduct with alleged animal cruelty towards farm stock – issues of procedural fairness – lost remuneration must be as a result of the grievance – procedural error did not result in loss remuneration - compensation for hurt, humiliation and loss of dignity discussed – conduct sufficiently egregious as to justify 100 per cent reduction in remedies for contributory conduct – Held, challenge succeeds, no remedies payable, order of stay discharged.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 133 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 89 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 133 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd - (Interlocutory judgment (No 18) of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 3 August 2015) APPLICATION FOR COMPLIANCE ORDERS – pendency of substantive hearing – application declined – leave to reapply at later date for purposes of costs.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 130 Scarborough v Micron Security Products Ltd [PDF, 166 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 130 Scarborough v Micron Security Products Ltd (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 31 July 2015) APPLICATION FOR RE-HEARING – declined – legal tests not met - costs to defendant.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 128 Severinsen & Anor v AFFCO NZ Ltd [PDF, 109 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 128 Severinsen & Anor v AFFCO NZ Ltd - (Judgment of Judge A D Ford, 30 July 2015) ORDERS MADE BY CONSENT – Defendant to pay plaintiffs compensation of $20,000 – Union and defendant agree to interpretation of a clause in expired collective agreement – agreement as to future non-reliance on Authority determination – parties to withdraw their challenges.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 126 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 127 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 126 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd - (Interlocutory Judgment (No 15) of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 29 July 2015) APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT DEFENCE – ALTERNATIVE APPLICATION TO APPOINT COMPUTER FORENSIC SPECIALIST - misconduct alleged through defendant's solicitor improperly discharging disclosure obligations – lack of evidence in support – alternative application previously addressed – case for revisiting not established – both applications dismissed.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 127 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 333 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 127 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd - (Interlocutory Judgment (No 16) of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 29 July 2015) PRIVILEGE – litigation privilege defined and distinguished from lawyer-client privilege – litigation privilege expires at end of litigation unless other proceedings closely related – analysis of documents for which privilege claimed – documents must be sufficiently identified to enable informed objection.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 129 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 87 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 129 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd - (Interlocutory Judgment (No 17) of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 29 July 2015) UNLESS ORDERS – treated as application for leave – leave refused – earlier judgment misinterpreted – application not strong enough to justify delay to proceedings.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 121 Morgan Schofield v Transit Coachlines Ltd [PDF, 110 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 121 Morgan Schofield v Transit Coachlines Ltd (Judgment of Judge A D Ford, 28 July 2015) REMOVAL TO COURT FROM AUTHORITY ON QUESTION OF LAW – Whether or not the plaintiffs met the requirements of completing 12 months continuous employment to entitle them to annual leave under s 16(2) of the Holidays Act 2003 – whether school holidays were periods of “unpaid leave” – definition of “leave” and “unpaid leave” considered – Held, plaintiffs satisfied criteria of completing 12 months continuous employment and were entitled to annual leave – costs to lie where they fall
-
[2015] NZEmpC 123 D’Arcy-Smith v Natural Habitats Ltd [PDF, 174 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 123 D’Arcy-Smith v Natural Habitats Ltd - (Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 28 July 2015) EMPLOYMENT STATUS – whether employee or contractor – some elements suggesting employee – overall factual analysis – contractor.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 124 Knapp v Locktite Aluminium Specialities Ltd costs [PDF, 109 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 124 Knapp v Locktite Aluminium Specialities Ltd (Costs Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 28 July 2015) COSTS – GST – SETTLEMENT OFFERS - consideration of principles applying to the inclusion or otherwise of GST in costs awards – settlement offers unreasonably rejected – full contribution appropriate – costs on costs modest – total costs award $2950
-
[2015] NZEmpC 125 Shanmuganathan v PowerNet Ltd [PDF, 78 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 125 Shanmuganathan v PowerNet Ltd (Judgment of Judge Corkill, 28 July 2015) REINSTATEMENT – order for reinstatement of plaintiff made subject to specified conditions.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 122 Campbell v The Commissioner of Salford School [PDF, 631 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 122 Campbell v The Commissioner of Salford School (Judgment of Judge Corkill, 27 July 2015) DE NOVO CHALLENGE – UNJUSTIFIED SUSPENSION - UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - whether suspension and dismissal were justified ––procedural and substantive flaws found - lack of specificity in claims against plaintiff- inadequate opportunity for plaintiff to be heard –– confidential information relied upon in investigation – terms of reference were too broad – no heed paid to earlier recommendations for urgent implementation of performance objectives – nonadherence to collective agreement in that distinction between performance and conduct issues not identified or considered – Held, disadvantage grievances established – compensation and costs awarded - reinstatement not reasonable or practical.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 120 G L Freeman Holdings Ltd v Livingston [PDF, 113 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 120 G L Freeman Holdings Ltd v Livingston (Judgment of Judge A A Couch, 24 July 2015) DE NOVO CHALLENGE - Employee resigned without giving the full stipulated period of notice required under contract – employer withheld final pay as a result - whether provision of agreement relied upon by employer in order to withhold money from employee was enforceable in law – whether that provision should be seen as liquidated damages for breach of contract or as a penalty - whether employee should be penalised for neglecting to give required notice period – if so, what amount – Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Company principles considered – regard given to intention of parties at time agreement was entered into – no monetary loss suffered as result of failure to give full notice period – forfeiture clause was to compel employee to give requisite notice by holding threat of loss of wages over employee and as such was held to be penalty provision which in good conscience and equity the Court ough…
-
[2015] NZ EmpC 119 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 100 KB] Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd - Interlocutory Judgment no 14 of Chief Judge G L Colgan. APPLICATION FOR LEAVE to file an application for the recall of the Interlocutory Judgement (NO 12) issued 20 July 2015 is granted, but the application for recall is refused.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 118 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 233 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 118 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Limited - (Judgment of Chief Judge GL Colgan, 23 July 2015) CHALLENGE TO OBJECTION – OBJECTION TO ANSWERING INTERROGATORIES – relevance of documents considered – some of objections to interrogatories upheld – those relating to performance and dismissal overruled – proportionality re-emphasised – no new issues raised.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 115 Lever v Dick and Alexander interlocutory [PDF, 177 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 115 Lever v Dick and Alexander (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 20 July 2015) COMPLIANCE – LIABILITY OF TRUSTEE - plaintiffs as trustees personally liable – s 140(6) options raised in preparation for any continued default.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 116 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 79 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 116 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd - (Interlocutory Judgment (No 12) of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 20 July 2015) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FURTHER INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATIONS – declined.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 117 Phil’s Place Ltd v Kiwa Kiwa and Clark [PDF, 66 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 117 Phil’s Place Ltd v Kiwa Kiwa and Clark (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 20 July 2015) DISCONTINUANCE – CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT