You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.

Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Search results

3640 items matching your search terms

  1. [2015] NZEmpC 180 Keepa v Go Bus Transport Ltd [PDF, 150 KB]

    [2015] NZEmpC 180 Keepa v Go Bus Transport Ltd (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 12 October 2015)  CLAIM FOR UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – plaintiff subject of several customer complaints – performance discussion and disciplinary meetings held - nemo judex in sua causa not appropriate– employer carrying out disciplinary function not acting judicially - accord and satisfaction considered – plaintiff resigned – no dismissal or constructive dismissal – challenge dismissed.

  2. [2015] NZEmpC 182 Juahm Industries Co Ltd v Isnanto [PDF, 103 KB]

    [2015] NZEmpC 182 Juahm Industries Co Ltd v Isnanto - (Judgment of Judge Corkill, 10 October 2015)  APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT CHALLENGE – principles applying to strike-out application discussed – issue as to jurisdiction to resolve the challenge – s236(3) and s179 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 considered – making of representation order by Authority in this instance did not have an irreversible and substantive effect – Held, application for strike out granted - Court does not have jurisdiction to consider challenge – costs reserved.

  3. [2015] NZEmpC 178 Twentyman v The Warehouse Ltd interlocutory [PDF, 116 KB]

    [2015] NZEmpC 178 Twentyman v The Warehouse Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 8 October 2015) SECURITY FOR COSTS – ORDER FOR STAY – plaintiff unsuccessful at Authority and ordered to pay costs plus penalty of $1500 – security for costs would deny challenge from proceeding – statutory right to proceed – execution of Authority orders stayed on condition that security for past costs excluding penalty be paid into the court

  4. [2015] NZEmpC 176 Lean Meats Oamaru Ltd v NZ Meat Workers & Related Trades Union Inc [PDF, 222 KB]

    [2015] NZEmpC 176 Lean Meats Oamaru Ltd v NZ Meat Workers & Related Trades Union Inc - (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 6 October 2015)  CHALLENGE – alleged non-compliance with statutory provisions for paid rest breaks – alleged non-compliance with Part 6D of the Employment Relations Act – whether parties included compensation for rest breaks in the collective employment agreements - principles as to interpretation of employment agreements applied – Held, Authority determination upheld, challenge dismissed - Union entitled to costs – parties to attempt to resolve quantum issues directly.

  5. [2015] NZEmpC 177 Southall v Tuau [PDF, 118 KB]

    [2015] NZEmpC 177 Southall v Tuau - (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 6 October 2015) CHALLENGE TO COSTS DETERMINATION – Wide discretionary power of Court to award costs – to be exercised according to principle – principles applying to Authority awards of costs considered – it was not unreasonable for the two Calderbank offers to be declined in their particular contexts – both Calderbank offers not relevant to consideration of costs – suitable for costs to follow event – normal daily tariff applies – some discontinuance for one aspect of claim - Held, challenge dismissed

  6. [2015] NZEmpC 169 Tertiary Education Union v Vice-Chancellor University of Auckland [PDF, 123 KB]

    [2015] NZEmpC 169 Tertiary Education Union v Vice-Chancellor University of Auckland - (Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 30 September 2015)  INTERPRETATION OF CLAUSE IN COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT – whether words of agreement meant that Vice-Chancellor could not make an amendment to policy without agreement of union – contract interpretation principles summarised – place of extrinsic materials considered – Vice-Chancellor may amend policy without agreement once participatory process is completed.

  7. [2015] NZEmpC 170 Mahamai v Belley (Labour Inspector) [PDF, 171 KB]

    [2015] NZEmpC 170 Mahamai v Belley (Labour Inspector) - (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 30 September 2015) .CHALLENGE TO COMPLIANCE, PENALTY AND COSTS ORDER – proceeding not dismissed on frivolous or vexatious grounds – evidence established plaintiff was employer – Minimum Wages Act 1983 considered – Plaintiff’s personal circumstances considered in light of plaintiff’s ability to pay the outstanding debts owed – whether payments by instalments were appropriate – whether there should be a penalty for non-payment – Held, compliance order issued for payment of unpaid wages, holiday pay and interest – all to be paid within 12 months of judgment date – to be reviewed at telephone conference

  8. [2015] NZEmpC 171 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 488 KB]

    [2015] NZEmpC 171 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd - (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 30 September 2015)  UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – CONSTRUCTIVE DISMISSAL - Employment transferred to rival business under Part 6A of the Employment Relations Act 2000 – issues as to whether promotion and increase in wages prior to transfer was genuine – terminology and purpose of s69I addressed – whether sham principles applied - employees terms deliberately inflated - representations made to subsequent employer were fictitious – employee could not have had legitimate expectation that employer had provided anything other than fictional increases – undue delay on part of employer in resolving uncertainties – stress and depression due to employment - Held, disadvantage grievance upheld – compensation of $1500 for humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to feelings after allowance for contributory behaviour

  9. [2015] NZEmpC 165 NZ Meat Workers & Related Trades Union Inc v AFFCO NZ Ltd [PDF, 86 KB]

    [2015] NZEmpC 165 NZ Meat Workers & Related Trades Union Inc v AFFCO NZ Ltd - (Oral Interlocutory judgment, 23 September 2015). APPLICATION FOR FURTHER AMENDMENTS TO STATEMENT OF CLAIM – REQUEST FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS – application for amendment declined – delay difficult and no prejudice to plaintiff – request for particulars not filed correctly and close to being a legal argument which can be raised at hearing– mediation not ruled out but not possible before date of hearing

  10. [2015] NZEmpC 158 Sealord Group Ltd v Pickering [PDF, 123 KB]

    [2015] NZEmpC 158 Sealord Group Ltd v Pickering - (Costs judgment of Judge A D Ford, 17 September 2015) COSTS – costs of submissions in Authority upheld - costs of witness professional fees in Authority were reasonable–notional daily tariff applied – first Calderbank offer not relevant as quantum of judgment plus costs exceeded value of Calderbank – second Calderbank offer irrelevant as not made within a reasonable time before hearing – interlocutory costs awarded in part - GST neutral position adopted – no award for witness professional fees in Court – interest for amount awarded by Authority – contribution for costs for submissions in Court – Held, $9,318.56 awarded for Authority costs - $41,000 for costs in Court

  11. [2015] NZEmpC 159 Smith Crane & Construction Ltd v Hall [PDF, 184 KB]

    [2015] NZEmpC 159 Smith Crane & Construction Ltd v Hall - (Costs judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 17 September 2015) COSTS – Da Cruz principles still apply – notional daily rate applied – no reason for uplift or decrease in usual starting rate of 66 per cent of costs actually and reasonably incurred for costs in the Authority – sch 2 and 3 of High Court Rules applied – awarded costs in the Court increased from starting rate of 66 per cent of costs actually and reasonably incurred to 75 per cent due to Calderbank offer - GST neutral position adopted – Held, $1,821.56 awarded to defendant for costs in Authority – $7,800 awarded to defendant for costs in Court.

  12. [2015] NZEmpC 160 Shanmuganathan v PowerNet Ltd [PDF, 139 KB]

    [2015] NZEmpC 160 Shanmuganathan v PowerNet Ltd - (Costs judgment of B A Corkill, 17 September 2015) COSTS – Authority cost determination set aside as outcome of Court’s substantive determination differed to Authority’s – Calderbank irrelevant as offered monetary award as opposed to reinstatement– normal daily tariff rate applied – modest decrease from starting rate of 66 per cent to 50 per cent of costs actually and reasonably incurred due to contributory conduct – no reduction in costs for mediation - GST neutral approach adopted – Held, in applicant’s favour - reimbursed $5,000 for setting aside of Authority determination – Authority costs of $3,500 – Court costs of $8670.95 – disbursements of $1,206.24

  13. [2015] NZEmpC 157 Labour Inspector v Cypress Villas Ltd full court [PDF, 515 KB]

    [2015] NZEmpC 157 Labour Inspector v Cypress Villas Ltd (Judgment of the Full Court, 16 September 2015) SECTION 234 - INTERPRETATION - DISSENT - consideration of application of s 234 of the ERA 2000 – first consideration of corporate veil-piercing where Labour Inspector has commenced action against company for recovery of minimum wages and holiday pay – consideration of legislative purpose and history of the section – plain meaning of words considered – steps outlined – relationship between subss(2) & (3) clarified - burden of proof addressed: Majority – intention not required for default – Authority discretion important: Dissent – knowledge of default required – different standard required for employers and directors, officers and agents of a company – “directed or authorised the default” to be read as a whole – intention of Parliament relevant to interpretation

  14. [2015] NZEmpC 156 Hoff v The Wood Lifecare Ltd costs [PDF, 85 KB]

    [2015] NZEmpC 156 Hoff v The Wood Lifecare Ltd (Costs Judgment of Judge A D Ford, 14 September 2015) COSTS – Calderbank offer irrelevant as did not exceed judgment sum – no adjustment to costs on account of conduct – no award of GST – reasonable costs awarded for non-publication order – no reason for change to usual starting rate of 66 per cent of costs actually and reasonably incurred – some disbursements allowed – costs on submissions granted – Held, plaintiff awarded $48,560 for challenge costs, disbursements and costs on submissions