[2025] NZEmpC 93 CG v Calendar Girls NZ Ltd (Judgment of Judge Helen Doyle 13 May 2025) APPLICATION FOR INTERIM NON-PUBLICATION - safety and professional reputation concerns if names are publicised - application is not futile - application granted - APPLICATION FOR AUDIO-VISUAL LINK - concerns can be mitigated via strict adherence to Court guidelines - application granted - CHALLENGE TO OBJECTION TO DISCLOSURE - relevance and proportionality - some documents to be disclosed.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3680 items matching your search terms
-
[2025] NZEmpC 93 CG v Calendar Girls NZ Ltd [PDF, 264 KB] -
[2025] NZEmpC 90 Youtap Ltd v Johnston [PDF, 244 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 90 Youtap Ltd v Johnston (Judgment of JudgeJC Holden 9 May 2025)DE NOVO CHALLENGE – IDENTITY OF EMPLOYER – subsidiary company was employer under employment agreement following novation – employee still able to claim an employment relationship with parent company under s 6 Employment Relations Act – true nature of relationship examined – mutual intention that employment was with subsidiary – employee not controlled by [or integral to] parent company over subsidiary company – no employment relationship with parent company – CONTROLLING THIRD PARTY – section 103B – no existing proceedings against employer to join parent company to
-
[2025] NZEmpC 91 LDJ v EZC [PDF, 280 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 91 LDJ v EZC (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Judge Kathryn Beck, 9 May 2025) LITIGATION GUARDIAN – CAPACITY – SUFFICIENT INSTRUCTIONS – counsel raised concerns about whether plaintiff has capacity to give sufficient instructions – medical and other evidence indicates that plaintiff is able to understand issues – medical and other evidence establishes that plaintiff is unable to properly exercise sound judgement and reasoning in relation to issues – plaintiff not able to give sufficient instructions – plaintiff is incapacitated – litigation guardian appointed – no conditions placed on appointment
-
[2025] NZEmpC 92 Happy Belly Production Limited v Dawson [PDF, 187 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 92 Happy Belly Production Limited v Dawson (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 9 May 2025) CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION - WAGE ARREARS - the employment agreement explicitly provides 40 minimum hours of work per week - insufficient evidence that lower hours worked can be attributed to employee default - employee is entitled to wage arrears - wage arrears awarded.
-
[2025] NZEmpC 89 Labour Inspector v Dao (Judgment (No 4) [PDF, 188 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 89 Labour Inspector v Dao (Judgment (No 4) of Judge Beck, 6 May 2025) FREEZING ORDERS – ANCILLARY ORDERS – VARIATION – CONTINUATION – unclear whether assets held by trust are realisable – further ancillary orders made to assess value of accounts of respondents – not necessary to order disclosure of bank statements – freezing orders continued
-
[2025] NZEmpC 88 Hurrell v Menopaws Ltd t/a Number 8 Café [PDF, 160 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 88 Hurrell v Menopaws Ltd t/a Number 8 Café (Interlocutory (No 2) Judgment of Judge KG Smith, 2 May 2025) COSTS – costs following interlocutory application – scale costs awarded.
-
[2025] NZEmpC 87 ELG v KLE (No 7) [PDF, 191 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 87 ELG v KLE (Judgment No7 of KG Smith 2 May 2025) NON-PUBLICATION – non-publication orders not necessary to protect sensitive commercial information – non-publication orders not necessary to protect employment prospects of respondent – non-publication orders necessary to protect confidentiality of settlement agreement signed by parties – non-publication orders made over parties and witnesses – first search order judgment redacted in part
-
[2025] NZEmpC 86 Parkers Beverage Company Limited v Tasker [PDF, 148 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 86 Parkers Beverage Company Limited v Tasker (judgment of Judge Holden 1 May 2025) CONSENT – Execution of Authority orders stayed by consent
-
[2025] NZEmpC 84 Port of Tauranga v Young [PDF, 174 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 84 Port of Tauranga v Young (Judgment of Judge Holden 30 April 2025) COSTS – guideline costs awarded – reduced contribution for second representative
-
[2025] NZEmpC 83 Labour Inspector v Dao (Judgment (No 3) [PDF, 187 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 83 Labour Inspector v Dao (Judgment (No 3) of Judge K Beck, 28 April 2025) FREEZING ORDERS – application to vary freezing orders – insufficient information about value and ownership of assets to vary orders – freezing orders continued on same terms as previously
-
[2025] NZEmpC 82 A Labour Inspector of MBIE v Dao (Judgment (No 2) [PDF, 206 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 82 A Labour Inspector of MBIE v Dao (Judgment (No 2) of Judge Beck, 17 April 2025) FREEZING ORDERS – VARIATION – application to vary freezing orders – some business bank accounts unfrozen – conditions placed on the unfreezing of some business bank acounts – family trust account not unfrozen – mortgage repayments can be facilitated without removing trust account from freezing order – new bank account to be set up for the purposes of receiving and paying ordinary living expenses and legal expenses
-
2025] NZEmpC 81 Nand v Idea Services Limited [PDF, 189 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 81 Nand v Idea Services Limited (Judgment of Judge M S King, 16 April 2025) STRIKE-OUT – REHEARING – WITHDRAWN PROCEEDINGS – COSTS – application to strike out application to rehear withdrawn application to file challenge out of time – application to file challenge out of time previously withdrawn due to settlement agreement – no basis for rehearing application as no hearing ever happened on original application – application to file challenge out of time cannot be reinstated or refiled because to do so would be an abuse of process in light of the settlement agreement – increased scale costs awarded – no basis for disbursements for out of town counsel – other disbursements awarded on GST exclusive basis
-
[2025] NZEmpC 80 AJY v Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections [PDF, 162 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 80 AJY v Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections (Judgment (No 2) of Judge Beck, 15 April 2025) CLARIFICATION OF REMEDIES – LOSS OF BENEFIT – claim by employee that they were entitled to retirement leave – employee could have requested retirement leave – employee could have been required to retire on medical grounds – insufficient evidence to find that employee might reasonably have been expected to obtain retirement leave but for unjustified dismissal
-
[2025] NZEmpC 79 FAJ v GEK and HIL [PDF, 152 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 79 FAJ v GEK and HIL (Consent Judgment of Chief Judge Inglis, 15 April 2025) DISCHARGE OF FREEZING ORDERS FOLLOWING MEDIATION – granted by consent
-
[2025] NZEmpC 78 Wilson Parking New Zealand Ltd v Turner & Anor [PDF, 156 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 78 Wilson Parking New Zealand Ltd v Turner & Anor (Judgment (No 2) of Chief Judge Inglis, 15 April 2025) APPLICATION TO AMEND METHODOLOGY OF SEARCH ORDERS – granted by consent
-
[2025] NZEmpC 77 DGE v AKO [PDF, 133 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 77 DGE v AKO (Consent judgment of Judge Beck, 15 April 2025) CONSENT – challenge resolved by consent – non-publication orders
-
[2025] NZEmpC 76 Vegepod NZ Ltd v Lowe [PDF, 291 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 76 Vegepod NZ Ltd v Lowe (Judgment of Chief Judge Inglis, 14 April 2025)APPLICATION FOR INTERIM REINSTATEMENT - dismissal arguably unjustifiable procedurally and substantively - relationship difficulties can be managed - insufficient evidence of misconduct and it is strongly refuted - balance of convenience favours reinstatement - reinstatement is sought for unusual reasons, but they do not tell against the appropriateness of the order - application granted
-
[2025] NZEmpC 75 QO v MYN [PDF, 165 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 75 QO v MYN (Costs Judgment of Chief Judge Inglis, 11 April 2025) COSTS – GUIDELINE SCALE – reduced costs awarded.
-
[2025] NZEmpC 74 Locke v Rishworth Aviation Asia Pacific Limited (Interlocutory judgment (No 2) [PDF, 161 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 74 Locke v Rishworth Aviation Asia Pacific Limited (Interlocutory judgment (No 2) of Judge Beck, 10 April 2025) APPEARANCE UNDER PROTEST – APPLICATION TO SET ASIDE APPEARANCE – JURISDICTION – FORUM NON CONVENIENS – plaintiff has applied to join foreign airline – foreign airline served in New Zealand – foreign airline appeared under protest to jurisdiction – application to set aside appearance under protest – Court has jurisdiction to hear application as foreign airline served in New Zealand – proper process to challenge forum is to apply for a stay or strike out – appearance under protest set aside
-
[2025] NZEmpC 72 Thebe v Te Whatu Ora – Health New Zealand (Interlocutory judgment of Judge Beck, 8 April 2025) [PDF, 179 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 72 Thebe v Te Whatu Ora – Health New Zealand (Interlocutory judgment of Judge Beck, 8 April 2025) STAY OF EXECUTION – plaintiff impecunious – challenge can still be pursued even if no stay is granted – defendant entitled to fruits of success but will not be injuriously affected if stay is ordered – application for stay of execution granted
-
[2025] NZEmpC 69 Bread of Life Christian Church in Auckland v Chen [PDF, 431 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 69 Bread of Life Christian Church in Auckland v Chen (Judgment of Judge Beck, 4 April 2025) STATUS OF WORKER – MINISTER OF RELIGION – IDENTITY OF EMPLOYER – LOST REMUNERATION – REINSTATEMENT – minister of religion became senior pastor of church – trust board of church split and dismissed minister – Authority ordered reinstatement – trust board dismissed minister again for redundancy – dispute over control of trust board being resolved in High Court – starting point to consider parties’ mutual rights and obligations – religious organisations differ from each other – there is no presumption against minister of religion intending to be legally bound – the Court is reluctant to resolve doctrinal disputes – the spiritual nature of a role is not determinative but is relevant – parties intended to be legally bound – parties’ relationship transcended but did not exclude legal relationship – parties’ intended for relationship to be employment relationship – no relevant industry p…
-
[2025] NZEmpC 71 Lu v Young [PDF, 156 KB] (Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 4 April 2025) STRIKE-OUT – DELAY – challenge stayed for almost two years due to unpaid security costs – insufficient explanation for delay to pay security – prejudice caused to defendant – plaintiffs consent to matter being dismissed if no costs ordered against them – challenge dismissed
-
[2025] NZEmpC 70 [2025] NZEmpC 70 Carrington Resort Jade LP v Maheno [PDF, 142 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 70 [2025] NZEmpC 70 Carrington Resort Jade LP v Maheno (Costs judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 4 April 2025) COSTS – INCREASED COSTS – increased scale costs awarded following matter being struck out
-
[2025] NZEmpC 68 Soundhomes NZ Ltd v Doughty [PDF, 174 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 68 Soundhomes NZ Ltd v Doughty (Judgment (No 9) of Judge Kathryn Beck, 3 April 2025) FREEZING ORDER – VARIATION – unsuccessful application to vary orders – orders extended by consent
-
[2025] NZEmpC 67 Singh v Chand [PDF, 149 KB] [2025] NZEmpC 67 Singh v Chand (judgment of Judge Holden 3 April 2025) URGENCY – not required by nature of proceedings – application dismissed