[2016] NZEmpC 6 Tertiary Education Union v Vice-Chancellor University of Auckland - (Judgment of Judge Inglis, 5 February 2016). COSTS - costs involving dispute as to interpretation and application of collective employment agreements – not in itself reason for costs to lie where they fall – flexible approach needed – not a test case - $13,200 ordered against plaintiff.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3638 items matching your search terms
-
[2016] NZEmpC 6 Tertiary Education Union v Vice-Chancellor University of Auckland [PDF, 100 KB] -
[2016] NZEmpC 3 HUNZA Productions Ltd v E Lighting Ltd [PDF, 68 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 3 HUNZA Productions Ltd v E Lighting Ltd (Interlocutory judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 4 February 2016) ORDER FOR STAY OF EXECUTION OF AUTHORITY’S ORDERS – consent of parties – sums awarded against plaintiff to be lodged with Registrar of the Employment Court on interest bearing deposit.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 4 Jones v Christchurch European Ltd [PDF, 66 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 4 Jones v Christchurch European Ltd Judgment of Judge Corkill, 4 February 2016) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO CHALLENGE OUT OF TIME – only 1 day delay – inadvertent error on the part of the plaintiff’s advocate – defendant does not oppose the application – no prejudice to the defendant – claim is tenable - leave granted
-
[2016] NZEmpC 2 Northern Amalgamated Workers Union of NZ v Golden Bay Cement [PDF, 205 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 2 Northern Amalgamated Workers Union of NZ v Golden Bay Cement - (Judgment of Judge Ford for the full Court, 1 February 2016) DE NOVO CHALLENGE - SECTION 9 EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS ACT 2000 - whether provision in collective employment agreement (CEA) conferred unlawful preference on members of the Union – whether a provision is unlawful that provides that vacancies will first be opened to permanent employees covered by the CEA – intention was to recognise benefits of a CEA or benefits arising out of relationship on which CEA was based rather than union membership - provision recognised benefits which could only be achieved through a CEA and the relationship arising from such an agreement - unions and employers free to negotiate and agree upon terms and conditions in a CEA which might otherwise infringe upon prohibition on preference – challenge successful - costs reserved
-
[2016] NZEmpC 5 Ritchies Transport Holdings Ltd v Keerithi Merennage [PDF, 69 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 5 Ritchies Transport Holdings Ltd v Merennage (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 27 January 2015) STAY OF EXECUTION OF AUTHORITY DETERMINATION – By consent – equivalent sum to be paid to registrar of Employment Court
-
[2016] NZEmpC 1 Kilpatrick v Air New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 252 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 1 Kilpatrick v Air New Zealand Ltd (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 13 January 2016) - UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – BREACH OF CONTRACT – behaviour sufficient for employer to conduct investigation -plaintiff unco-operative –no breaches of contract - many attempts to engage plaintiff in disciplinary process – challenge dismissed.(HTML version)
-
[2015] NZEmpC 234 2015 AFT v BCM [PDF, 294 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 234 AFT v BCM, Judgment of Chief Judge Colgan (Judgment of Chief Judge Colgan, 23 December 2015) LEAVE TO FILE CHALLENGE OUT OF TIME. Leave refused as the respondent would suffer prejudice if it was to mount a defence to the substance of the applicant’s claim of unjustified constructive dismissal.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 195 IAG NZ Limited v Boulger [PDF, 12 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 195 IAG NZ Limited v Boulger (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge Colgan, 21 December 2015) APPLICATION FOR ORDER FOR STAY OF EXECUTION OF JUDGMENT – granted on two conditions – first, sums awarded against plaintiff to be lodged with Registrar of the Employment Court – second, plaintiff to attend court to address allegations of judicial corruption.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 232 Bidvest New Zealand Limited v FIRST Union Inc reasons for interlocutory [PDF, 132 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 232 Bidvest New Zealand Limited v FIRST Union Inc (Reasons for interlocutory judgment of Chief Judge Colgan, 21 December 2015). INTERIM INJUNCTION – notice of intention to strike – whether action unlawful because employees engaged in essential service – question of fact and degree in a particular case – arguable case established – balance of convenience and overall justice favoured granting of interim injunction – parties directed to mediation.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 227 Lean Meats Oamaru Ltd v NZ Meat Workers Union [PDF, 99 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 227 Lean Meats Oamaru Ltd v NZ Meat Workers Union (Costs Judgment of Judge Corkill, 18 December 2015) Plaintiff ordered to pay the defendant $6,408.88 in costs.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 229 Twentyman v The Warehouse Limited (No 2) [PDF, 78 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 229 Twentyman v The Warehouse Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 17 December 2015) ARRANGING SECURITY FOR COSTS – order for security for costs clarified – stay remains in place.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 230 FIRST Union Inc v Jacks Hardware and Timber Ltd [PDF, 365 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 230 FIRST Union Inc v Jacks Hardware and Timber Ltd, (Judgment of Chief Judge Colgan, 17 December 2015). DECLARATION – AN END TO COLLECTIVE BARGAINING? - FACILITATED BARGAINING – declaration regarding employer's assertion that bargaining for collective agreement concluded on specific date without settlement of a collective agreement – application for order directing parties to facilitated bargaining – whether breach of good faith – s 33 Employment Relations Act 2000 – whether genuine reasons based on reasonable grounds – place of remuneration in collective agreements and confidentiality of employment terms – whether bargaining was unduly protracted – whether extensive efforts failed to resolve difficulties and precluded parties from entering into agreement - Held, Bargaining not lawfully ended under former s 33 - Authority to accept application for facilitated bargaining – plaintiff entitled to costs but no time limit imposed on application.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 228 NZ Meat Workers Union Inc v South Pacific Meats Ltd and Talley [PDF, 177 KB] NZ Meat Workers Union Inc v South Pacific Meats Ltd and Talley (costs judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan) An apparent unsuccessful party seeking an order for costs and order for indemnity costs against the apparent successful party. Defendants ordered to pay indemnity costs of $9,409.70. Defendants request for orders prohibiting publication declined.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 225 Lumsden v Skycity Management Ltd [PDF, 206 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 225 Lumsden v Skycity Management Ltd, (judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 16 December 2015). FRIVOLOUS AND VEXATIOUS – REVISITING FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS - claim of breach of settlement agreement – whether challenge to settlement containing “full and final settlement” clause was frivolous and vexatious – part of a matter cannot be dismissed on such grounds – meaning of ‘frivolous’ considered – not the same as lacking legal merit – must be impossible to take seriously – in some circumstances full and final settlement may be revisited – Authority to proceed with investigation.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 226 Sheath v The Selwyn Foundation [PDF, 86 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 226 Sheath v The Selwyn Foundation (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 15 December 2015) REMOVAL TO COURT – dismissal for redundancy followed challenge to determination regarding unjustified disadvantage – may be important point of law not incidental to proceedings – matters are related – order for removal made.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 223 Thompson v Middle Earth Flying School Ltd [PDF, 76 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 223 Thompson v Middle Earth Flying School Ltd, (Interlocutory judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 14 December 2015). APPLICATION FOR STAY – granted on condition of security for costs.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 222 Marra Construction (2004) Ltd v Pretorius [PDF, 146 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 222 Marra Construction (2004) Ltd v Pretorius, (Judgment of Judge Corkill, 11 December 2015) EXTENSION OF TIME – whether application to lodge challenge out of time should be granted – whether justice of case justifies extension – no prejudice caused to respondent due to delay – partial compliance in that it was filed in time but fee was paid late – it would be unfair for applicant to be denied possibility of challenge – Held, leave to extend time granted, filing fee to be accepted by Registrar - costs to lie where they fall
-
[2015] NZEmpC 220 Wellington Free Ambulance Service Inc v Austing costs [PDF, 67 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 220 Wellington Free Ambulance Service Inc v Austing costs, (Costs Judgment of Judge A D Ford, 10 December 2015. COSTS – whether costs were reasonably incurred – starting point of 66 per cent of costs reasonably incurred – whether factors justify an increase or decrease from that starting point – award of costs is discretionary – court not persuaded to make any adjustment to the usual starting point – disbursements considered and allowed in part – Held, plaintiff ordered to pay costs and disbursements in total sum of $17,535.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 221 Caffe Coffee (NZ) Ltd v Farrimond interlocutory [PDF, 154 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 221 Caffe Coffee (NZ) Ltd v Farrimond interlocutory, (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 10 December 2015) APPLICATION FOR STAY – opposed – legal principles considered – security for costs ordered – stay granted.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 224 Rothesay Bay Physiotherapy (2000) Ltd v Pryce-Jones [PDF, 143 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 224 Rothesay Bay Physiotherapy (2000) Ltd v Pryce-Jones - (Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 16 December 2015). EMPLOYEE OR CONTRACTOR – dispute as to intention of contract – real nature of relationship analysed - respondent found to be contractor
-
[2015] NZEmpC 219 NZ Meat Workers & Related Trades Union Inc v AFFCO NZ Ltd [PDF, 108 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 219 NZ Meat Workers & Related Trades Union Inc v AFFCO NZ Ltd - (Interlocutory Judgment (No 6) of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 9 December 2015) IMPLEMENTATION OF FULL COURT’ ORDERS – position at Wairoa works– need to identify affected employees – allegations of disadvantageous shift work and denial of overtime for some Union employees – Union claim for past losses – applications by Union for facilitation and by AFFCO that bargaining has concluded – timetable for further applications.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 217 Rimmer v Carter Holt Harvey Ltd consent [PDF, 8 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 217 Rimmer v Carter Holt Harvey Ltd consent judgement of Judge B A Corkill (Consent Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 7 December 2015) . CONSENT - parties agreed to settle all matters on the basis that a consent judgment be issued -by consent Employment Relations Authority determination set aside - order of non publication to apply to confidential settlement agreement.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 218 Corporate Energy Ltd (in liq) (formerly known as Corporate Energy Ltd t/a Caltex Glenbrook) v Singh [PDF, 78 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 218 Corporate Energy Ltd (in liq) (formerly known as Corporate Energy Ltd t/a Caltex Glenbrook) v Singh (Oral Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 7 December 2015) NOTICE OF DISCONTINUANCE – COSTS - plaintiff failed to file bundle – strike out application made – pre-empted by notice of discontinuance by liquidator – costs of $8,920 against plaintiff
-
[2015] NZEmpC 215 Rimmer v Carter Holt Harvey Ltd interlocutory [PDF, 160 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 215 Rimmer v Carter Holt Harvey Ltd interlocutory, (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 3 December 2015) . ADMISSIBILITY OF EXPERT EVIDENCE – whether proposed evidence is beyond the scope of expert’s specialised knowledge and skill – whether the evidence substantially helps the Court – Evidence Act 2006 considered – given the technical nature of the health and safety issues to be considered in the case the threshold for admissibility is met for all paragraphs of the brief of evidence except for para 69 - Held, intended evidence is admissible apart from para 69 of the brief.
-
[2015] NZEmpC 216 Roy v Tamaki College Board of Trustees no 3 interlocutory [PDF, 151 KB] [2015] NZEmpC 216 Roy v Tamaki College Board of Trustees no 3 interlocutory, (Interlocutory Judgment (No 3) of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 3 December 2015) MEDIA APPLICATION TO INSPECT COURT RECORDS – High Court Rules and Media Guidelines considered – partial inspection ordered