You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.

Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Search results

3642 items matching your search terms

  1. [2016] NZEmpC 97 Banks v Hockey Manawatu Inc [PDF, 193 KB]

    [2016] NZEmpC 97 Warren Banks v Hockey Manawatu Incorporated (Costs Judgment of Judge Corkill, 5 August) COSTS – principles considered – costs in the Authority should follow the event, based on notional daily rate – costs in the Court considered, including scale assessments and legal charges – Calderbank offers considered and principles applied – conduct of parties factored into costs assessment – allowance for GST – Court disbursements considered – defendant’s financial circumstances considered – total of $123,034.10 awarded.

  2. [2016] NZEmpC 89 NZ Nurses Organisation v Waikato District Health Board [PDF, 198 KB]

    [2016] NZEmpC 89 New Zealand Nurses Organisation v Waikato District Health Board (Judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 12 July 2016) APPLICATION FOR RECALL/REHEARING – initial judgment dealt with individual case but not with independent challenge by organisation as to broader meaning of  collective agreement’s phrase “retiring from the organisation” – case law on recall and rehearing considered – grounds exist for rehearing of part of case –rehearing granted - questions for rehearing suggested.

  3. [2016] NZEmpC 87 Kupa v Silver Fern Farms Beef Ltd [PDF, 248 KB]

    [2016] NZEmpC 87 Kupa v Silver Fern Farms Beef Ltd (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 7 July 2016) UNJUSTIFIABLE DISMISSAL – whether refusal to follow instruction was health and safety issue or unreasonable – issue of credibility – whether instruction reasonable – test considered – instruction reasonable – warning would have been appropriate – collective agreement supported alternatives to dismissal – dismissal not justifiable – reinstatement ordered – 50% contributory conduct  - 3 months’ wages - $14,000 compensation reduced to $7,000.

  4. [2016] NZEmpC 86 Radius Residential Care Ltd v The NZ Nurses Organisation Inc [PDF, 182 KB]

    [2016] NZEmpC 86 Radius Residential Care Ltd v The New Zealand Nurses Organisation Inc (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 6 July 2016)  DISCLOSURE - SELF-INCRIMINATION IN PROCEEDINGS WHERE ORDERS SOUGHT INCLUDE PENALTIES – Reg 39(2) of the Employment Court Regulations precludes inter-party document disclosure where penalties are sought - no need to separate penalty from other proceedings - decided cases under reg 39(2) considered - common law privilege against self-incrimination in civil penalty cases exists - Court should examine documents to ensure there is no self-incrimination - directions given accordingly. .