[2016] NZEmpC 102 Shane Andrew Mercer v Robert Lester McIntyre (Costs Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 18 August 2016) COSTS – plaintiff accepted contribution to costs appropriate – costs quantum assessed by analogy to High Court scale – no reduction of costs for alleged aggravating conduct – costs of $10,700 awarded.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3642 items matching your search terms
-
[2016] NZEmpC 102 Mercer v McIntyre [PDF, 76 KB] -
[2016] NZEmpC 100 Secretary for Education v NZ Educational Institute Te Riu Roa [PDF, 209 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 100 Secretary for Education v New Zealand Educational Institute Te Riu Roa (Judgment of Judge Corkill, 18 August 2016) CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION – collective agreement framework – annualisation of pay – natural and ordinary meaning considered and applied.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 99 Auckland International Airport Ltd v Kimiangatau and Ors [PDF, 55 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 99 Auckland International Airport Limited v Tere Kimiangatau, ASB Bank Limited & Westpac New Zealand Limited (Judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 11 August 2016) FREEZING ORDERS – amendment of freezing order.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 98 Nisha Alim v LSG Sky Chef New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 144 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 98 Shabeena Shareen Nisha (Nisha Alim) v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Limited (Interlocutory Judgment No.21 of Judge Corkill, 10 August) APPLICATION FOR JOINDER – application for urgency considered and declined.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 97 Banks v Hockey Manawatu Inc [PDF, 193 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 97 Warren Banks v Hockey Manawatu Incorporated (Costs Judgment of Judge Corkill, 5 August) COSTS – principles considered – costs in the Authority should follow the event, based on notional daily rate – costs in the Court considered, including scale assessments and legal charges – Calderbank offers considered and principles applied – conduct of parties factored into costs assessment – allowance for GST – Court disbursements considered – defendant’s financial circumstances considered – total of $123,034.10 awarded.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 96 Auckland International Airport Ltd v Kimiangatau and Ors [PDF, 80 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 96 Auckland International Airport Limited v Tere Kimiangatau, ASB Bank Limited & Westpac New Zealand Limited (Judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 3 August 2016) FREEZING ORDERS – removal of property and net proceeds of sale from coverage of freezing order.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 95 Pretorius v Marra Construction (2004) Ltd [PDF, 270 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 95 Fredrick Pretorius v Marra Construction (2004) Limited (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 2 August 2016) TIME LIMITATION – principles considered – whether an agreement for overtime or bonus payments existed – quantum meruit claims considered and principles applied – claims under the Minimum Wage Act 1983 and Holidays Act 1993 not statute barred.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 94 Advance International Cleaning Systems (NZ) Ltd v Hamilton [PDF, 58 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 94 Advance International Cleaning Systems (NZ) Limited v Steven Hamilton (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 1 August 2016) CONSENT – confidential terms of settlement agreed – Authority determinations set aside.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 93 Radius Residential Care Ltd v NZ Nurses Organisation [PDF, 72 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 93 Radius Residential Care Limited v The New Zealand Nurses Organisation Inc (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Judge M E Perkins, 28 July 2016) DISCLOSURE – COMMON LAW PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION – objection to production for inspection valid – directions given accordingly.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 92 Patel & Anor v Sharma [PDF, 90 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 92 Chetanbhai Patel and Mohnakshi Enterprises Limited trading as Trinity Crescent Four Square v Amit Kumar Sharma (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 22 July 2016) STAY OF EXECUTION – defendant domiciled overseas – principles of stay considered – stay granted on condition whole amount of Authority award be paid into Court.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 91 Khurana v Singh [PDF, 100 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 91 Deepak Khurana v Surender Singh (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 20 July 2016) SECURITY FOR COSTS – whether security for costs appropriate – principles considered – application dismissed.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 90 Davidson v Kelly [PDF, 55 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 90 Judith Ann Davidson v Stephen Robert Kelly (Judgment No 4 of Judge Corkill, 14 July) COMPLIANCE ORDER – three previous compliance orders – continued default – further compliance order made.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 89 NZ Nurses Organisation v Waikato District Health Board [PDF, 198 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 89 New Zealand Nurses Organisation v Waikato District Health Board (Judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 12 July 2016) APPLICATION FOR RECALL/REHEARING – initial judgment dealt with individual case but not with independent challenge by organisation as to broader meaning of collective agreement’s phrase “retiring from the organisation” – case law on recall and rehearing considered – grounds exist for rehearing of part of case –rehearing granted - questions for rehearing suggested.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 88 TD Drilling 2014 Ltd v Crichton [PDF, 162 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 88 TD Drilling 2014 Ltd v Crichton (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 12 July 2016) STAY OF EXECUTION – challenge not to Authority’s finding of unjustified dismissal, but only to identity of employer – stay principles considered - interests of justice favour successful defendant – application declined.
-
[2016] NZCA 314 CA 659/2015 CA674/2015 Saad v McIvor [PDF, 65 KB] JUDGMENT OF THE COURT, 7 July 2016. The applications for an extension of time to seek leave under s 214 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 are declined.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 87 Kupa v Silver Fern Farms Beef Ltd [PDF, 248 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 87 Kupa v Silver Fern Farms Beef Ltd (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 7 July 2016) UNJUSTIFIABLE DISMISSAL – whether refusal to follow instruction was health and safety issue or unreasonable – issue of credibility – whether instruction reasonable – test considered – instruction reasonable – warning would have been appropriate – collective agreement supported alternatives to dismissal – dismissal not justifiable – reinstatement ordered – 50% contributory conduct - 3 months’ wages - $14,000 compensation reduced to $7,000.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 85 Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development v Tuilaepa [PDF, 85 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 85 Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development v Tuilaepa (Judgment of Chief Judge Colgan) 6 July 2016) STAY OF EXECUTION – joint application – Authority ordered reinstatement pending outcome of challenge – orders for interim payment of salary on conditions of no attendance at workplace and undertaking by plaintiff not to seek later reimbursement.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 86 Radius Residential Care Ltd v The NZ Nurses Organisation Inc [PDF, 182 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 86 Radius Residential Care Ltd v The New Zealand Nurses Organisation Inc (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 6 July 2016) DISCLOSURE - SELF-INCRIMINATION IN PROCEEDINGS WHERE ORDERS SOUGHT INCLUDE PENALTIES – Reg 39(2) of the Employment Court Regulations precludes inter-party document disclosure where penalties are sought - no need to separate penalty from other proceedings - decided cases under reg 39(2) considered - common law privilege against self-incrimination in civil penalty cases exists - Court should examine documents to ensure there is no self-incrimination - directions given accordingly. .
-
[2016] NZEmpC 84 Stormont v Peddle Thorp Aitken Ltd [PDF, 69 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 84Stormont v Peddle Thorp Aitken Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 30 June 2016) STAY OF EXECUTION – by consent – order on conditions.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 83 Savage v Capital Coast DHB [PDF, 259 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 83 Savage v Capital & Coast District Health Board (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 30 June 2016) CASUAL OR PERMANENT EMPLOYEE – legal tests considered - employment offer for casual employee– contract interpretation – clear definition of casual and permanent in MECA - nature of employment relationship in practice examined – challenge failed.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 82 Davidson v Kelly [PDF, 67 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 82 Davidson v Kelly (Judgment No 3 of Judge B A Corkill, 29 June 2016) COMPLIANCE ORDER – breach of payment obligations
-
[2016] NZEmpC 81 Eden Group Ltd v Jackson [PDF, 103 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 81 Eden Group Ltd v Jackson (No 3) Judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan
-
[2016] NZEmpC 80 Tribe v John Scott & Co Ltd [PDF, 108 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 80 Tribe v John Scott & Co Ltd (Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 23 June 2016) UNJUSTIFIABLE DISMISSAL – whether plaintiff resigned –reasonable for employer to take from correspondence that plaintiff intended resignation – insufficient steps taken to clear possible misapprehension – challenge dismissed.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 79 Alpha Laboratories (NZ) Ltd v La [PDF, 13 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 79 Alpha Laboratories (NZ) Ltd v La (Consent Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 22 June 2016) CONSENT – terms of settlement agreed – Authority determinations set aside.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 78 Northern Legal Ltd v Eketone-Te Kanawa [PDF, 68 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 78 Northern Legal Ltd v Eketone-Te Kanawa (Consent Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 20 June 2016) CONSENT - settlement agreed – Authority determination set aside.