[2016] NZEmpC 119 Initiative! Un Limited v Mohammad Mahbubur Rahman (Oral Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 15 September 2016) APPLICATION FOR STAY – legal tests applied – stay granted – full amount to be paid to Registrar and held until dispersed by the Court.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3630 items matching your search terms
-
[2016] NZEmpC 119 Initiative! Un Ltd v Rahman [PDF, 102 KB] -
[2016] NZEmpC 118 Briggs-Barron v Ladbrook Law Ltd [PDF, 83 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 118 Briggs-Barron v Ladbrook Law Limited (Costs Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 14 September 2016) COSTS – costs following discontinuance of claim – discontinuing plaintiff liable for costs up to date of discontinuance – costs not deferred pending outcome of claim in the Authority – GST not included in costs order – defendant awarded costs of $2,800.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 117 NZMWU Inc v AFFCO NZ Ltd [PDF, 160 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 117 New Zealand Meat Workers and Related Trades Union Incorporated v AFFCO New Zealand Limited (Judgment (No 2) of Judge B A Corkill, 8 September 2016) WAGES – damages at common law – Wages Protection Act 1983 – application of s 11 to unlawful lockouts – re-engagement under collective agreement – unlawful deduction of wages is recoverable – circumstances of individuals to be assessed on a case by case basis – duty to mitigate does not arise.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 115 Savage v Capital & Coast District Health Board [PDF, 65 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 115 David Savage v Capital & Coast District Health Board (Costs Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 6 September 2016) CONSENT – costs orders made by consent.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 116 Owen v Chief Executive of the Dept of Corrections [PDF, 72 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 116 Deborah Owen v The Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections (Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 5 September 2016) APPLICATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE CHALLENGE – principles considered – minor delay – leave granted.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 114 Hutt City Veterinary Care Ltd v Barr [PDF, 64 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 114 Hutt City Veterinary Care Limited v Cecilia Barr (Judgment of Judge K G Smith) LIQUIDATION – litigation disclaimed under s 269 of the Companies Act 1993 – proceeding dismissed.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 113 The Pulp and Paper Industry Council v Oji Fibre Solutions Ltd [PDF, 308 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 113 The Pulp and Paper Industry Council of the Manufacturing and Construction Workers Union v Oji Fibre Solutions (NZ) Ltd (Formerly Carter Holt Harvey Pulp and Paper Ltd) (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 31 August 2016) CONTRACT INTERPRETATION – STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – calculation of leave entitlements – relevant daily pay – payment of public holidays occurring within period of leave – costs reserved.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 112 Radius Residential Care Ltd v The NZ Nurses Organisation Inc [PDF, 431 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 112 Radius Residential Care Limited v The New Zealand Nurses Organisation Inc (Judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 31 August 2016) STRIKE – AUTHORISED UNION MEETING – COLLECTIVE BARGAINING – employee actions not a union meeting – strikes found unlawful – standard of proof higher than balance of probabilities for statutory penalties – first and second defendants liable as parties to unlawful strike action – damages awarded – insufficient evidence for liability to penalties – breach of good faith obligations insufficient for penalties purposes – costs reserved.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 111 MUNZ v The China Navigation Co Pte Ltd [PDF, 505 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 111 Maritime Union of New Zealand Inc v The China Navigation Company Pte Limited (Reasons for Judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 29 August 2016) COLLECTIVE BARGAINING – LOCKOUT – offers of employment not on a take-it-or-leave-it basis – s 63A(2) complied with – s 82 definition of employee and employer includes prospective employees and employers – s 82(1)(a)(iv) precondition not met – offer of employment on individual employment agreement does not constitute a lockout – two or more employees necessary for an effective collective agreement – two or more employees not necessary for initiation of collective bargaining – offer of employment transfer does not constitute current employee – collective bargaining initiated lawfully.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 110 Matsuoka v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd [PDF, 88 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 110 John Matsuoka v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 29 August 2016) DISCLOSURE – NON-PARTY DISCLOSURE - disclosure of tax records in absence of time and wage records – non-party breached obligation to retain full time and wage records for employee – privacy of other employees not compromised by disclosure – disclosure of relevant Inland Revenue documents ordered – costs reserved.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 109 Dotcom v Orduna [PDF, 148 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 109 Dotcom v Orduna (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 26 August 2016) DISCLOSURE – application for disclosure of other staff employment agreements too wide – other staff time and wage records relevant – disclosure of documents considered relevant business records not oppressive – objection to production by reference to Privacy Act ill-founded – financial documents irrelevant – PAYE records relevant – disclosure of job descriptions ordered – disclosure of wage and time records ordered – disclosure of PAYE documents ordered.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 108 Davidson v Kelly [PDF, 63 KB] Judith Ann Davidson v Stephen Robert Kelly [2016] NZEmpC 108 (Judgment No 5 of Judge B A Corkill) COMPLIANCE ORDER – breach of payment obligations – payment ordered.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 107 Watson v Capital & Coast District Health Board [PDF, 120 KB] Angela Watson v Capital and Coast District Health Board [2016] NZEmpC 107 (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill) ADMISSIBILITY – DISCLOSURE – whether location of parties during mediation is admissible – purposive interpretation of s 148 – context of mediation considered – evidence inadmissible – disclosure sought on work records, diary notes and medical records – relevance and confidentiality – disclosure ordered on listed documents and records.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 106 Hunza Productions Ltd v E Lighting Ltd [PDF, 58 KB] Hunza Productions Limited v E Lighting Limited [2016] NZEmpC 106 (Consent Judgment of Judge K G Smith) CONSENT – parties agreed to settle consolidated proceeding – penalties set aside – stay of execution discharged and payments reimbursed – no orders for costs.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 105 Caffe Coffee (NZ) Ltd v Farrimond [PDF, 124 KB] Caffe Coffee (NZ) Ltd v Sune Farrimond [2016] NZEmpC 105 (Costs Judgment of Judge B A Corkill) COSTS – principles applied – Court’s Guideline Scale – Calderbank offers – claim for disbursements – contribution to costs and disbursements in the Authority and Court ordered.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 104 MUNZ v The China Navigation Co Pte Ltd [PDF, 128 KB] Maritime Union of New Zealand Inc v The China Navigation Company Pte Ltd [2016] NZEmpC 104 (Interim Judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan) COLLECTIVE BARGAINING – LOCKOUT – interim judgment – offer of employment on individual employment agreement does not constitute a lockout – collective bargaining initiated lawfully – legitimate for Court to assist parties beyond narrow and technical issues – costs reserved
-
[2016] NZEmpC 103 Lewis v Silver Fern Farms Ltd [PDF, 183 KB] Richard Lewis (Labour Inspector) v Silver Fern Farms Limited [2016] NZEmpC 103 (Judgment of Judge K G Smith) HOLIDAYS ACT – whether Labour Day was a public holiday or ‘otherwise working day’ – Labour Inspector investigation – consideration of s 12(3) – collective agreement did not provide for ‘pre-op’ cleaning – pattern of working days not established – challenge dismissed.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 101 Modern Transport Engineers (2002) Ltd v Phillips [PDF, 65 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 101 Modern Transport Engineers (2002) Limited v Phillips (Consent Costs Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 18 August 2016) CONSENT – COSTS – costs issues resolved by parties – settlement terms confidential.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 102 Mercer v McIntyre [PDF, 76 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 102 Shane Andrew Mercer v Robert Lester McIntyre (Costs Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 18 August 2016) COSTS – plaintiff accepted contribution to costs appropriate – costs quantum assessed by analogy to High Court scale – no reduction of costs for alleged aggravating conduct – costs of $10,700 awarded.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 100 Secretary for Education v NZ Educational Institute Te Riu Roa [PDF, 209 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 100 Secretary for Education v New Zealand Educational Institute Te Riu Roa (Judgment of Judge Corkill, 18 August 2016) CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION – collective agreement framework – annualisation of pay – natural and ordinary meaning considered and applied.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 99 Auckland International Airport Ltd v Kimiangatau and Ors [PDF, 55 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 99 Auckland International Airport Limited v Tere Kimiangatau, ASB Bank Limited & Westpac New Zealand Limited (Judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 11 August 2016) FREEZING ORDERS – amendment of freezing order.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 98 Nisha Alim v LSG Sky Chef New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 144 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 98 Shabeena Shareen Nisha (Nisha Alim) v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Limited (Interlocutory Judgment No.21 of Judge Corkill, 10 August) APPLICATION FOR JOINDER – application for urgency considered and declined.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 97 Banks v Hockey Manawatu Inc [PDF, 193 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 97 Warren Banks v Hockey Manawatu Incorporated (Costs Judgment of Judge Corkill, 5 August) COSTS – principles considered – costs in the Authority should follow the event, based on notional daily rate – costs in the Court considered, including scale assessments and legal charges – Calderbank offers considered and principles applied – conduct of parties factored into costs assessment – allowance for GST – Court disbursements considered – defendant’s financial circumstances considered – total of $123,034.10 awarded.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 96 Auckland International Airport Ltd v Kimiangatau and Ors [PDF, 80 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 96 Auckland International Airport Limited v Tere Kimiangatau, ASB Bank Limited & Westpac New Zealand Limited (Judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 3 August 2016) FREEZING ORDERS – removal of property and net proceeds of sale from coverage of freezing order.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 95 Pretorius v Marra Construction (2004) Ltd [PDF, 270 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 95 Fredrick Pretorius v Marra Construction (2004) Limited (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 2 August 2016) TIME LIMITATION – principles considered – whether an agreement for overtime or bonus payments existed – quantum meruit claims considered and principles applied – claims under the Minimum Wage Act 1983 and Holidays Act 1993 not statute barred.