You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.

Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Search results

3630 items matching your search terms

  1. [2016] NZEmpC 168 Borsboom (Labour Inspector) v Preet PVT Ltd & Others [PDF, 118 KB]

    [2016] NZEmpC 168 Borsboom (Labour Inspector) v Preet PVT Ltd & Others (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 16 December 2016) FREEZING ORDER – ancillary order – orders made against judgment debtors – director deemed to have taken control and possession of company assets – relevant assets within jurisdiction – risk of dissipation of assets found – plaintiff’s requirement to give undertaking waived under Public Finance Act 1989 – balance of convenience and overall justice in plaintiff’s favour – respondents ordered to disclose financial position – freezing order granted.

  2. [2016] NZEmpC 167 Labour Inspector v Tech 5 Recruitment Ltd [PDF, 250 KB]

    [2016] NZEmpC 167 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v Tech 5 Recruitment (Judgment of the Full Court, 16 December, 2016) PREMIUMS – whether employment agreements contained premium clause – s 12A Wages Protection Act – the meaning of “premium” defined – trade-testing costs were premium – employment agreements containing obligations to pay are “seeking a premium” – challenge successful.

  3. [2016] NZEmpC 166 Alim v Sky Chefs NZ Ltd [PDF, 537 KB]

    [2016] NZEmpC 166 Nisha Alim v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment (No 22) of Judge B A Corkill, 14 December 2016) APPLICATION FOR JOINDER – history behind joinder proceedings surveyed – principles for awarding costs against non-parties considered – evidence linking third party to direct involvement in issues surrounding litigation – guiding mind – evidence of attempts to remove company from Register to avoid liability for costs – availability of security for costs not a reason to deny costs order against “real” party – third parties joined.

  4. [2016] NZEmpC 165 Lawson v NZ Transport Agency [PDF, 463 KB]

    [2016] NZEmpC 165 Tere Lawson v New Zealand Transport Agency (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 13 December 2016) UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – REMEDIES –   plaintiff dismissed for serious misconduct – not all issues and evidence being considered by employer were put to plaintiff - inadequate process conducted - good record relevant to choice of outcomes – not considered by employer –challenge succeeded – contribution – impact of subsequently discovered conduct – significant misconduct to be taken into account – no remedies awarded under s 123.

  5. [2016] NZEmpC 161 NZ Airline Pilots Assoc Inc v Air NZ Ltd [PDF, 234 KB]

    [2016] NZEmpC 161 New Zealand Airline Pilots’ Assoc Inc v Air New Zealand Ltd (Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 1 December 2016) CONTRACT INTERPRETATION – ESTOPPEL - effect of “downtraining” and contractual obligations – analysis of circumstances and history of relevant contractual clauses – consideration of principles of contractual interpretation – pilots employed as “pilots simpliciter” rather to particular positions – airline aimed to avoid redundancy  - estoppel considered – tests not met – challenge dismissed.

  6. [2016] NZEmpC 159 Lumsden v Skycity Management Ltd [PDF, 101 KB]

    [2016] NZEmpC 159 Lumsden v Skycity Management Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 28 November 2016) APPLICATION FOR COURT TO STATE CASE TO COURT OF APPEAL ON QUESTION OF LAW – s 211 - criterion is that matter is before the Court – not necessary to be completed – helpful to Court of Appeal if it has benefit of this Court’s views in forming its own – matter set for hearing in Employment Court – application declined.

  7. [2016] NZEmpC 153 Spotless Facility Services NZ Ltd v Mackay [PDF, 272 KB]

    [2016] NZEmpC 153 Spotless Facility Services NZ Limited v Anne Mackay (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 21 November 2016) CONSTRUCTIVE DISMISSAL – principles considered – “final straw” cases considered  - sequence of events important – genuine but mistaken belief that employer’s response destructive of trust and confidence – no constructive dismissal –  submissions sought on the question of disadvantage grievance.

  8. [2016] NZEmpC 151 Carr, Labour Inspector v Sharma [PDF, 204 KB]

    [2016] NZEmpC 151 Darren Brett Carr, Labour Inspector v Vishaal Kumar Sharma (Sentencing Notes of Judge M E Perkins, 17 November 2016) OBSTRUCTING A LABOUR INSPECTOR – GUILTY PLEA – SENTENCING – s 235 charge - guilty plea entered  –criminal jurisdiction of Employment Court and Sentencing Act applies – principles of sentencing applied –factors to be considered in discharge without conviction – discharge without conviction - $500 towards costs ordered against defendant.