You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.

Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Search results

3640 items matching your search terms

  1. [2017] NZEmpC 28 Rossiter v AFFCO New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 158 KB]

    [2017] NZEmpC 28 Rossiter v AFFCO New Zealand Ltd  (Interlocutory Judgment (No2) of Judge B A Corkill, 13 March 2017) APPLICATION FOR STAY – pending appellate judgments Authority stayed claim – challenge not precluded by s 179(5) – defendant applied to stay challenge - assessed under Court’s equity and good conscience jurisdiction – stay principles considered - AFFCO’s application for stay dismissed – substantive challenge to proceed on basis of law as it stands prior to appellate decision .

  2. [2017] NZEmpC 23 Domingo v Suon and Heng (t-a Town and Country Food) [PDF, 178 KB]

    [2017] NZEmpC 23 Domingo v Suon (Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 7 March 2017) COMPLIANCE ORDER – defendant failed to comply with Authority’s compliance order – whether Employment Court has jurisdiction to impose a sanction under s 140(6) where enforcement may be sought in District Court – set-off claim prohibited by minimum code statutes – jurisdiction found – defendant fined $11,000 – part-payment of  $6,600 to plaintiff – plaintiff entitled to costs.

  3. [2017] NZEmpC 12 Stormont v Peddle Thorp Aitken Ltd [PDF, 193 KB]

    [2017] NZEmpC 12 Stormont v Peddle Thorp Aitken Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 16 February 2017) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO RESPOND OUT OF TIME – whether plaintiff obliged to file a reply to defendant’s positive defence – whether leave should be granted to extend the time to file reply – application of High Court Rules to positive defences – High Court Rules held to apply – overall interests of justice considered – application to extend time for filing reply to defendant’s positive defence granted.

  4. [2017] NZEmpC 11 Matsuoka v LSG Sky Chefs Ltd [PDF, 173 KB]

    [2017] NZEmpC 11 Matsuoka v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge M E Perkins in respect of 1) Application for wasted costs order; 2) first amended application for further and better discovery in respect of electronic documents etc, 15 February 2017) APPLICATION FOR WASTED COSTS ORDER – APPLICATION FOR FURTHER AND BETTER DISCOVERY – prior hearing concerning outstanding applications adjourned due to amended statement of claim – wasted costs could have been avoided by informing opposing counsel and Court of amended pleadings – $10,000 wasted costs ordered against plaintiff –case law and factors relevant to further discovery considered – existence of further documents speculative – discovery process disproportionate to claim – plaintiff’s further discovery application declined – further particular discovery of certain documents ordered.