[2017] NZEmpC 32 New Zealand Meat Workers & Related Trades Union Inc v AFFCO New Zealand Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 20 March 2017) APPLICATION FOR STAY – related proceedings before appellate courts – this application compared with previous one- stay principles applied to present situation – application denied.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3640 items matching your search terms
-
[2017] NZEmpC 32 NZ Meat Worker & Related Trades Union Inc v AFFCO NZ Ltd [PDF, 107 KB] -
[2017] NZEmpC 31 Ratu v AFFCO NZ Ltd [PDF, 98 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 31 Ratu v AFFCO New Zealand Ltd (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 17 March 2017) APPLICATION FOR ORDER TO REMOVE – principles to be considered in s 178 application considered – two of questions raised are procedural – third question factual and not a question of law – application dismissed.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 30 Lumsden v Skycity Management Ltd [PDF, 222 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 30 Lumsden v Skycity Management Ltd (Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 14, March 2017) BREACHES OF s 149 AGREEMENT – confidential terms agreed - no conflict between s 149 and s 238 – defendant breached non-disparagement clause – penalties sought for breach – recent case law considered – penalty of $7,500 ordered, with 75% to plaintiff.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 29 Mahamai v Belley (Labour Inspector) [PDF, 81 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 29 Mahamai v Belley (Labour Inspector) (Judgment (No 2) of Judge B A Corkill, 13 March 2017) PENALTY – unacceptable delay in complying with financial orders – difficulty in paying – compliance order now complied with – application for penalty dismissed.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 28 Rossiter v AFFCO New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 158 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 28 Rossiter v AFFCO New Zealand Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment (No2) of Judge B A Corkill, 13 March 2017) APPLICATION FOR STAY – pending appellate judgments Authority stayed claim – challenge not precluded by s 179(5) – defendant applied to stay challenge - assessed under Court’s equity and good conscience jurisdiction – stay principles considered - AFFCO’s application for stay dismissed – substantive challenge to proceed on basis of law as it stands prior to appellate decision .
-
[2017] NZEmpC 25 Ahuja and ors v Labour Inspector [PDF, 81 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 25 Ahuja v A Labour Inspector, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 9 March 2017) VARIATION OF TIMETABLING ORDERS – application for leave to extend time to comply with timetabling directions – interests of justice considered – extension granted – costs awarded against plaintiff.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 27 Dent v Waikato DHB [PDF, 192 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 27 Dent v Waikato District Health Board (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge M E Perkins Regarding Challenge to Objection to Disclosure, 8 March 2017) DISCLOSURE – OBJECTION TO DISCLOSURE – CHALLENGE TO OBJECTION TO DISCLOSURE – legal principles considered and applied – partial disclosure ordered.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 26 Tulloch v Hays Specialist Recruitment Australia Pty Ltd [PDF, 96 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 26 Tulloch v Hays Specialist Recruitment (Australia) Pty Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 8 March 2017) ADMISSIBILITY – CONFIDENTIALITY - whether email subject to confidentiality of mediation – application dismissed.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 24 Tradefog Global Co Ltd v Bartholomeusz [PDF, 177 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 24 Tradefog Global Co Ltd v Batholomeusz (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 8 March 2017 IDENTITY OF EMPLOYER – whether joining a party by Authority is precluded from challenge under s 179(5) – case law on s 179(5) considered – challenges dismissed.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 23 Domingo v Suon and Heng (t-a Town and Country Food) [PDF, 178 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 23 Domingo v Suon (Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 7 March 2017) COMPLIANCE ORDER – defendant failed to comply with Authority’s compliance order – whether Employment Court has jurisdiction to impose a sanction under s 140(6) where enforcement may be sought in District Court – set-off claim prohibited by minimum code statutes – jurisdiction found – defendant fined $11,000 – part-payment of $6,600 to plaintiff – plaintiff entitled to costs.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 21 Sheath v The Selwyn Foundation and ors [PDF, 63 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 21 Sheath v The Selwyn Foundation and ors (Consent Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 1 March 2017) CONSENT – terms of settlement agreed – Authority determination set aside.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 20 New World Market Ltd v Wang [PDF, 76 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 20 New World Market Ltd v Wang (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins as to Costs on Discontinuance, 23 February 2017) DISCONTINUANCE – plaintiff paid Authority awards in full through District Court proceeding – costs of discontinuance of $3,456 awarded to defendant.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 19 Lewis v Silver Fern Farms Ltd [PDF, 141 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 19 Lewis v Silver Fern Farms Ltd (Costs Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 23 February 2017) COSTS – consideration of principles to be applied – not a test case - costs on costs also awarded – costs of $5,740 awarded in favour of defendant.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 18 Leota v Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development [PDF, 81 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 18 Leota v Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development (Costs Judgment of Judge M M E Perkins, 23 February, 2017) COSTS – consideration of ability to pay – costs reduced - $7,000 awarded against plaintiff.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 17 Te Whanau O Waipareira Trust v Yao [PDF, 78 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 17 Te Whanau o Waipareira Trust v Yao (Judgment as to costs on discontinuance of Judge M E Perkins, 23 February 2017) DISCONTINUANCE OF CHALLENGE – costs on discontinuance – principles considered and applied – costs of $2,072 awarded in favour of defendant.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 16 Thomson v Arrow Line Marking Ltd [PDF, 12 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 16 Thomson v Arrow Linemarking Ltd (Consent Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 23 February 2017) CONSENT – confidential terms – consent order made.
-
{2017] NZEmpC 15 Spotless Facility Services NZ Ltd v Mackay [PDF, 143 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 15 Spotless Facility Services NZ Ltd v Mackay (Judgment (No 2) of Judge B A Corkill, 22 February 2017) DISADVANTAGE GRIEVANCE – s 122 considered – adequacy of investigation of stress issues – lack of response to raising of concerns – unjustified disadvantage under s 122 found – compensation of $2000 awarded.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 14 Matsuoka v LSG Sky Chefs Ltd [PDF, 84 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 14 Matsuoka v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge M E Perkins in respect of application for preservation orders, 17 February 2017) PRESERVATION ORDER – no evidence of policy to destroy documents – inadequate grounds for order – order for costs against plaintiff.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 13 Lewis v Immigration Guru Ltd [PDF, 105 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 13 Lewis v Immigration Guru Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 16 February 2017) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE CHALLENGE OUT OF TIME – relevant principles and interests of justice considered – application for leave granted.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 12 Stormont v Peddle Thorp Aitken Ltd [PDF, 193 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 12 Stormont v Peddle Thorp Aitken Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 16 February 2017) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO RESPOND OUT OF TIME – whether plaintiff obliged to file a reply to defendant’s positive defence – whether leave should be granted to extend the time to file reply – application of High Court Rules to positive defences – High Court Rules held to apply – overall interests of justice considered – application to extend time for filing reply to defendant’s positive defence granted.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 11 Matsuoka v LSG Sky Chefs Ltd [PDF, 173 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 11 Matsuoka v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge M E Perkins in respect of 1) Application for wasted costs order; 2) first amended application for further and better discovery in respect of electronic documents etc, 15 February 2017) APPLICATION FOR WASTED COSTS ORDER – APPLICATION FOR FURTHER AND BETTER DISCOVERY – prior hearing concerning outstanding applications adjourned due to amended statement of claim – wasted costs could have been avoided by informing opposing counsel and Court of amended pleadings – $10,000 wasted costs ordered against plaintiff –case law and factors relevant to further discovery considered – existence of further documents speculative – discovery process disproportionate to claim – plaintiff’s further discovery application declined – further particular discovery of certain documents ordered.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 10 Xtreme Dining Ltd t/a Think Steel v Dewar [PDF, 107 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 10 Xtreme Dining t/a Think Steel v Dewar (Costs Judgment of the Full Court, 14 February 2017) COSTS – test case – Calderbank offer – GST considered – actual costs appropriate – plaintiff to pay costs of $25.031.16
-
[2017] NZEmpC 9 Cooper v CMP Canterbury Ltd [PDF, 12 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 9 Cooper v CMP Canterbury Ltd (Consent Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 13 February 2017) CONSENT – confidential terms – consent order made.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 8 Lawson v NZ Transport Agency [PDF, 62 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 8 Lawson v New Zealand Transport Agency (Costs Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 31 January 2017) COSTS – CONSENT – consent order made.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 7 Lyttelton Port Co Ltd v The Rail and Maritime Transport Union Inc (No.5) [PDF, 64 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 7 Lyttelton Port Company Ltd v The Rail and Maritime Transport Union Inc (Interlocutory Judgment (No 5) of Judge B A Corkill, 31 January 2017) STRIKE – orders previously set out should apply to this strike – application to restrain strike declined.