[2017] NZEmpC 42 Matsuoka v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 28 April 2017) NON-PAYMENT OF NON-PARTIES’ RETRIEVAL AND STORAGE COSTS – expert evidence considered – cost for storage and retrieval of payroll information ordered.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3630 items matching your search terms
-
[2017] NZEmpC 42 Matsuoka v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd [PDF, 70 KB] -
[2017] EmpC 41 Cronin-Lampe and anor v BOT of Melville High School [PDF, 211 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 41Cronin-Lampe v The Board of Trustees of Melville High School (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 26 April 2017) APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE TO RAISE PERSONAL GRIEVANCES OUT OF TIME AND TO BRING PROCEEDINGS – amended statement of claim to be accepted subject to further amendment - common law proceedings under s 4(7) Limitation Act 1950 for bodily injury – reasonable discovery – mistake of law –prejudice – leave granted on basis that delay occasioned by mistake of law and other reasonable cause – other action to be deferred to hearing.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 40 XYZ v ABC [PDF, 271 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 40 XYZ v ABC (Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 12 April 2017) APPLICATIONS FOR INTERIM REINSTATEMENT, INTERIM NON-PUBLICATION – principles for interim reinstatement applied – application declined – recent case law considered – stringent approach required – interim non-publication granted.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 39 ALA v ITE [PDF, 317 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 39 ALA v ITE (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 12 April 2017) BREACH OF COMPLIANCE ORDER – SANCTIONS – whether defendant failed to comply with compliance order – how to assess public interest justification – principles of comity applied – one breach found – fine of $7,500 – permanent non-publication orders made.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 38 Eden Group Ltd v Jackson [PDF, 111 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 38 Eden Group Ltd v Jackson (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge K G Smith in Respect of a Request to Access Documents on the Court File, 5 April 2017) ACCESS TO COURT FILE – access sought by person not a party to proceedings – legal principles applied – no order prohibiting access to court file in place – selective access granted with conditions.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 37 Rossiter v AFFCO NZ Ltd [PDF, 90 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 37 Rossiter v AFFCO New Zealand Ltd (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 4 April 2017) CHALLENGE TO STAY OF AUTHORITY INVESTIGATION – challenge allowed for reasons outlined in earlier judgment – Authority’s stay determination set aside.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 36 The Free Range Egg & Poultry Co. Ltd v Miller [PDF, 80 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 36 The Free Range Egg & Poultry Co Ltd v Miller (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 31 March 2017) APPLICATION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION OF ORDERS – stay principles applied – financial impact unsupported by evidence - application dismissed – defendant entitled to costs.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 35 Ahuja and Others v Labour Inspector [PDF, 336 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 35 Ahuja v Labour Inspector, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 30 March 2017) CHALLENGE – AUTHORITY AWARDED PENALTY OF ITS OWN MOTION – REPRESENTATION - whether Authority should appear when not a party to plaintiff’s challenge – whether independent counsel to be appointed – Labour Inspector not appropriate defendant in every case but appropriate where party to challenge and willing participant – costs to be met out of public funds.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 34 Twentyman v The Warehouse Ltd [PDF, 140 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 34 Twentyman v The Warehouse Ltd (Costs Judgment and Further Order of Judge K G Smith, 29 March 2017) COSTS – REVOCATION OF STAY – factually complex – costs accepted rounded to $42,000 – disbursement claim reasonable – stay revoked.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 33 NZ Meat Workers and Related Trades Union Inc and Anor v AFFCO NZ Ltd [PDF, 208 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 33 NZ Meat Workers and Related Trades Union Inc and Anor v AFFCO NZ Ltd Judgment No.3 of Judge B A Corkill
-
[2017] NZEmpC 32 NZ Meat Worker & Related Trades Union Inc v AFFCO NZ Ltd [PDF, 107 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 32 New Zealand Meat Workers & Related Trades Union Inc v AFFCO New Zealand Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 20 March 2017) APPLICATION FOR STAY – related proceedings before appellate courts – this application compared with previous one- stay principles applied to present situation – application denied.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 31 Ratu v AFFCO NZ Ltd [PDF, 98 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 31 Ratu v AFFCO New Zealand Ltd (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 17 March 2017) APPLICATION FOR ORDER TO REMOVE – principles to be considered in s 178 application considered – two of questions raised are procedural – third question factual and not a question of law – application dismissed.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 30 Lumsden v Skycity Management Ltd [PDF, 222 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 30 Lumsden v Skycity Management Ltd (Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 14, March 2017) BREACHES OF s 149 AGREEMENT – confidential terms agreed - no conflict between s 149 and s 238 – defendant breached non-disparagement clause – penalties sought for breach – recent case law considered – penalty of $7,500 ordered, with 75% to plaintiff.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 29 Mahamai v Belley (Labour Inspector) [PDF, 81 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 29 Mahamai v Belley (Labour Inspector) (Judgment (No 2) of Judge B A Corkill, 13 March 2017) PENALTY – unacceptable delay in complying with financial orders – difficulty in paying – compliance order now complied with – application for penalty dismissed.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 28 Rossiter v AFFCO New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 158 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 28 Rossiter v AFFCO New Zealand Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment (No2) of Judge B A Corkill, 13 March 2017) APPLICATION FOR STAY – pending appellate judgments Authority stayed claim – challenge not precluded by s 179(5) – defendant applied to stay challenge - assessed under Court’s equity and good conscience jurisdiction – stay principles considered - AFFCO’s application for stay dismissed – substantive challenge to proceed on basis of law as it stands prior to appellate decision .
-
[2017] NZEmpC 25 Ahuja and ors v Labour Inspector [PDF, 81 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 25 Ahuja v A Labour Inspector, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 9 March 2017) VARIATION OF TIMETABLING ORDERS – application for leave to extend time to comply with timetabling directions – interests of justice considered – extension granted – costs awarded against plaintiff.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 27 Dent v Waikato DHB [PDF, 192 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 27 Dent v Waikato District Health Board (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge M E Perkins Regarding Challenge to Objection to Disclosure, 8 March 2017) DISCLOSURE – OBJECTION TO DISCLOSURE – CHALLENGE TO OBJECTION TO DISCLOSURE – legal principles considered and applied – partial disclosure ordered.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 26 Tulloch v Hays Specialist Recruitment Australia Pty Ltd [PDF, 96 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 26 Tulloch v Hays Specialist Recruitment (Australia) Pty Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 8 March 2017) ADMISSIBILITY – CONFIDENTIALITY - whether email subject to confidentiality of mediation – application dismissed.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 24 Tradefog Global Co Ltd v Bartholomeusz [PDF, 177 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 24 Tradefog Global Co Ltd v Batholomeusz (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 8 March 2017 IDENTITY OF EMPLOYER – whether joining a party by Authority is precluded from challenge under s 179(5) – case law on s 179(5) considered – challenges dismissed.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 23 Domingo v Suon and Heng (t-a Town and Country Food) [PDF, 178 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 23 Domingo v Suon (Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 7 March 2017) COMPLIANCE ORDER – defendant failed to comply with Authority’s compliance order – whether Employment Court has jurisdiction to impose a sanction under s 140(6) where enforcement may be sought in District Court – set-off claim prohibited by minimum code statutes – jurisdiction found – defendant fined $11,000 – part-payment of $6,600 to plaintiff – plaintiff entitled to costs.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 21 Sheath v The Selwyn Foundation and ors [PDF, 63 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 21 Sheath v The Selwyn Foundation and ors (Consent Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 1 March 2017) CONSENT – terms of settlement agreed – Authority determination set aside.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 20 New World Market Ltd v Wang [PDF, 76 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 20 New World Market Ltd v Wang (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins as to Costs on Discontinuance, 23 February 2017) DISCONTINUANCE – plaintiff paid Authority awards in full through District Court proceeding – costs of discontinuance of $3,456 awarded to defendant.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 19 Lewis v Silver Fern Farms Ltd [PDF, 141 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 19 Lewis v Silver Fern Farms Ltd (Costs Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 23 February 2017) COSTS – consideration of principles to be applied – not a test case - costs on costs also awarded – costs of $5,740 awarded in favour of defendant.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 18 Leota v Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development [PDF, 81 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 18 Leota v Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development (Costs Judgment of Judge M M E Perkins, 23 February, 2017) COSTS – consideration of ability to pay – costs reduced - $7,000 awarded against plaintiff.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 17 Te Whanau O Waipareira Trust v Yao [PDF, 78 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 17 Te Whanau o Waipareira Trust v Yao (Judgment as to costs on discontinuance of Judge M E Perkins, 23 February 2017) DISCONTINUANCE OF CHALLENGE – costs on discontinuance – principles considered and applied – costs of $2,072 awarded in favour of defendant.