[2017] NZEmpC 88 AFT in the matter of an application for access to Court documents (Judgment by Judge M E Perkins, 19 July 2017) ACCESS TO COURT DOCUMENTS – application for access to Court file by applicant who is not a party to those proceedings – grounds for application considered – High Court rules considered – relevant factors considered – application declined.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3640 items matching your search terms
-
[2017] NZEmpC 88 Application for access to court documents [PDF, 88 KB] -
[2017] NZEmpC 87 Below v The Salvation Army New Zealand Trust [PDF, 259 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 87 Below v The Salvation Army New Zealand Trust (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 10 July 2017) SECTION 6 – STUDENT - Salvation Army cadets – whether full-time cadets with some expenses paid by Salvation Army meet tests for employee status –‘student’ cases considered - ecclesiastical cases considered - scholarships not linked to work –no mutuality of obligation – context important – activities part of “learning by doing” programme – employee tests applied – cadets not employees.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 86 McLaren v Stephen Marr Hair Design Newmarket Ltd [PDF, 68 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 86 McLaren v Stephen Marr Hair Design Newmarket Ltd (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 10 July 2017) CONSENT – proceedings discontinued – Authority’s costs determination set aside by consent – plaintiff to pay defendant’s costs in the Authority.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 85 Ramkissoon v Commissioner of New Zealand Police [PDF, 668 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 85 Ramkissoon v The Commissioner of Police (Judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 7 July 2017) UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – CONSTRUCTIVE DISMISSAL – plaintiff disadvantaged by non-appointment and Police not following own review procedures -reimbursement of wages and $30,000 compensation ordered – not disadvantaged by rehabilitation process and resignation on medical grounds – not unjustifiably constructively dismissed.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 84 The Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development v Tuilaepa [PDF, 205 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 84 The Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development v Tuilaepa (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 5 July 2017) UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – serious misconduct – breach of Code of Conduct concerning management of young persons – inappropriate force - no significant flaws in disciplinary process – s 103A test of justification met – challenge unsuccessful.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 83 Fuimaono v Houia [PDF, 82 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 83 Fuimaono v Houia (Judgment (No 2) of Judge B A Corkill, 5 July 2017) APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT BY INSTALMENTS – instalments not appropriate – Court has no discretion to relieve party of payment obligations – application declined – memoranda invited on possibility of attending mediation.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 82 Judea Tavern Ltd v Jesson [PDF, 121 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 82 Judea Tavern Ltd v Jesson (Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 30 June 2017) UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – dismissal for medical incapacity considered – plaintiff failed to engage with defendant – fundamental procedural errors – compensation of $5,000 awarded, along with lost remuneration – ACC payments not to be taken into account.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 81 Nelson Marlborough District Health Board v Henderson [PDF, 181 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 81 Nelson Marlborough District Health Board v Henderson (Costs Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 30 June 2017) COSTS - Costs incurred by successful plaintiff were reasonably incurred – no GST awarded – uplift justified on basis of offer which was refused – ability to pay considered – total costs in Court and Authority awarded against defendant of $64,457.35.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 80 E Tu Inc v NZ Transport Agency [PDF, 138 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 80 E Tu Inc v New Zealand Transport Agency (Costs Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 26 June 2017) COSTS – whether costs should lie where they fall – 66% taken as starting point – decrease of 50% to recognise benefit to both sides - $15,000 costs awarded against defendant.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 79 Watson v Capital and Coast District Health Board [PDF, 12 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 79 Watson v Capital and Coast District Health Board (Consent Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 21 June 2017) CONSENT – confidential terms – non-publication order.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 78 Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections v CANZ Inc [PDF, 191 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 78 Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections v Corrections Association of New Zealand (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 21 June 2017) CONTRACT INTERPRETATION – RESTRUCTURING – whether Chief Executive could disestablish a position without negotiation with union over variation – requirements of coverage clauses considered – clear acceptance in collective contract and practice of Chief Executive’s right to restructure – challenge succeeded.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 77 Idea Services Ltd v Crozier [PDF, 413 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 77 Idea Services Ltd v Crozier (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 19 June 2017) UNJUSTIFIABLE DISMISSAL – MEDICAL INCAPACITY – employer had substantive justification for terminating employment – no pre-determination – fair procedure followed – discrimination on grounds of disability not established – challenge succeeded.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 76 Dent v Waikato DHB [PDF, 92 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 76 Dent v Waikato District Health Board (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 13 June 2017) APPLICATION TO HAVE DOCUMENTS DECLARED INADMISSIBLE – orders given that some categories of specified documents be admitted.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 74 Speed v Board of Trustees of Wellington Girls College [PDF, 121 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 74 Speed v Board of Trustees of Wellington Girls College (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge K E Smith, 9 June 2017) STAY – SECURITY FOR COSTS – action in High Court – principles considered where concurrent actions in different courts – stay granted subject to conditions – security for costs already in High Court – application for security for costs adjourned until stay set aside.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 75 Oliver v Scott Haulage 2010 Ltd [PDF, 101 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 75 Oliver v Scott Haulage 2010 Ltd
-
[2017] NZEmpC 73 Caterers on the Run Ltd v Pillay [PDF, 68 KB] 2017] NZEmpC 73 Caterers on the Run Ltd v Pillay (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 9 June 2017) STRIKE OUT – statement of claim not compliant with reg 11 - time extended to complete and file amended statement of claim – further extension given –no amended claim filed – matter struck out.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 71 Stormont v Peddle Thorp Aitken Ltd [PDF, 497 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 71 Stormont v Peddle Thorp Aitken Ltd (Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 6 June 2017) BONUS – CONTRACT – REDUNDANCY - HURT AND HUMILIATION – bonus to be calculated according to terms of contract – no estoppel existed – employer breach of good faith in relation to bonus and redundancy – penalty imposed – penalty quantum surveyed – special damages awarded – meaning of “humiliation, loss of dignity an injury to feelings” considered – compensation quantum surveyed – unpaid bonus, special damages and lost remuneration ordered with holiday pay and interest - $25,000 compensation.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 72 Nathan v Broadspectrum (New Zealand) Ltd [PDF, 95 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 72 Nathan v Broadspectrum (New Zealand) Ltd (formerly Transfield Services (New Zealand) Ltd) (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 6 June 2017) REINSTATEMENT – NON-COMPLIANCE – stay order for 14 days not delayed pending Court of Appeal decision – company not at liberty to impose own conditions on return to work – compliance order made.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 70 Edminstin v Sanford Limited [PDF, 515 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 70 Edminstin v Sanford Ltd (Judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 6 June 2017) INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – CONTRACT – ownership of “marks” in identifying oyster beds – traditional custom and practice and its place in law considered – “marks” belong to skippers – not overridden by employment agreement – distinguished from JP Morgan – history of “marks” surveyed – ownership of “marks” exclusive to plaintiff - breach of property rights not proven.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 69 8i Corp v Marino [PDF, 156 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 69 8i Corporation v Marino (Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 6 June 2017) SECTION 149 – PENALTY CLAUSE – whether term of mediator-signed agreement can be challenged subsequently on grounds of unlawfulness, or whether such scrutiny is precluded by s 149(3) – “enforcement purposes” interpreted - Court may look into lawfulness of a term on public policy grounds.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 68 Matsuoka v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd [PDF, 272 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 68 Matsuoka v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge M E Perkins in respect of applications relating to disclosure, further and better particulars and amendments to preservation order, 2 June 2017) WAIVER OF PRIVILEGE - PARTICULARS – PRESERVATION ORDER – law relating to loss of privilege by imputed waiver considered – nuanced issue – privileged waived by disclosures in previous proceedings in the same matter – application for further and better particulars declined – plaintiff ordered to provide tax records for year ending 31 March 2010 – application for details of funding arrangements declined – application for amendment to preservation order declined.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 67 Holman v CTC Aviation Training (NZ) Ltd [PDF, 12 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 67 Holman v CTC Aviation Training (NZ) Ltd (Consent Judgment of Judge M E Perkins in relation to costs, 1 June 2017) CONSENT – COSTS – confidential terms.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 66 Lal v The Warehouse [PDF, 136 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 66 Lal v The Warehouse Ltd (Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 1 June 2017) UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – MEDICAL INCAPACITY – employee’s return to light duties after injury made conditional on employer meeting her request to transfer to different store – not accepted – mutual obligations in employment relationship – procedurally fair- dismissal justifiable.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 65 Lorigan v Infinity Automotive Ltd [PDF, 13 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 65 Lorigan v Infinity Automotive Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 24 May 2017) APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME – leave sought to file notice of opposition to application for security of costs – overall interests of justice considered – leave granted.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 64 Prasad v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 91 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 64 Prasad v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment (No 3) of Judge M E Perkins, 24 May 2017) DISCLOSURE – verification of disclosure – application for further and better disclosure – relevant principles considered and applied – verification of disclosure and further and better disclosure orders made.