[2017] NZEmpC 115 Schollum v Corporate Consumables Ltd (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 27 September 2017) HOLIDAY PAY – commission excluded from calculation – consideration of statutory interpretation – law on interpretation of Holidays Act considered - whether agreement to pay was reached – estoppels principles considered - liability only, not quantum, established in this judgment – defendant liable for arrears for breaches of Holidays Act.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3640 items matching your search terms
-
[2017] NZEmpC 115 Schollum and Hastings v Corporate Consumables Ltd [PDF, 598 KB] -
[2017] NZEmpC 114 Quality Consumables Ltd v Hannah [PDF, 167 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 114 Quality Consumables Ltd v Hannah (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 26 September 2017) APPLICATION FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS – consideration of stay principles – stay of enforcement of determination granted on condition that plaintiff pay to defendant sum of $15,000 – balance of award to be paid to Registry pending further order of the Court – costs on application to be paid to defendant.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 113 Unite Union Inc v Restaurant Brands Ltd [PDF, 306 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 113 Unite Union Inc v Restaurant Brands Ltd (Costs Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 25 September 2017) COSTS – Court’s guideline scale does not overrule discretion – not a test case - $10,000 awarded against plaintiff – no order for costs on costs.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 112 Chevelle Motors Ltd v Cranswick [PDF, 99 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 112 Chevelle Motors Ltd v Cranswick (Costs Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 20 September 2017) COSTS – no costs memo received from plaintiff – reasonable expenses of Community Law Centre awarded - $1,200 costs against plaintiff to be paid to Community Law Centre.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 111 Sawyer v Vice Chancellor, Victoria University of Wellington [PDF, 98 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 111 Sawyer v Vice Chancellor, Victoria University of Wellington (Judgment of Judge Smith, 12 September 2017) APPLICATION FOR STAY OF AUTHORITY INVESTIGATION – leave to extend time to file challenge – whether stay should be granted before extension of time allowed – whether Court has jurisdiction under s 179(5).
-
[2017] NZEmpC 110 Below v The Salvation Army NZ Trust [PDF, 131 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 110 Below v Salvation Army (Judgment of Judge Corkill, 8 September 2017) COSTS – whether a test case and costs should lie where they fall – ability of party to pay - general principles of costs discussed - $7500 costs contribution ordered
-
[2017] NZEmpC 109 ALA v ITE [PDF, 162 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 109 ALA v ITE (Judgment of Judge Corkill, 1 September 2017) URGENT APPLICATION FOR TAKEDOWN ORDER – scope of powers under s 139(2) discussed – non-compliance with court orders – possibility of further sanctions.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 108 Chevelle Motors Ltd v Cranswick [PDF, 81 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 108 Chevelle Motors Ltd v Cranswick (Judgment of Judge Perkins, 29 August 2017) CHALLENGE DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 106 Crimson Consulting Ltd v Berry (No 2) [PDF, 100 KB] [2017] EmpC 106 Crimson Consulting Ltd v Berry (No 2) (Judgment of Judge Corkill, 29 August 2017) INTERIM ORDER FOR NON-PUBLICATION SPECIFIED – commercially sensitive information – irrelevant evidence.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 105 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd & Anor [PDF, 159 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 105 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd (Judgment No 24 of Judge Corkill, 28 August 2017) APPLICATION FOR DISCLOSURE AND JOINDER – potential abuse of process – principles for discretion to order joinder discussed – whether impecuniousness is required.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 104 Nathan v Broadspectrum (NZ) Ltd [PDF, 218 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 104 Nathan v Broadspectrum (NZ) Ltd (formerly Transfield Services (NZ) Ltd (Judgment of Judge Smith, 25 August 2017) APPLICATION FOR STAY – competency assessments after reinstatement ordered – health and safety issues – impact on third parties – jurisdiction to grant a stay discussed – principles of granting a stay discussed.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 103 McPherson v Carter Holt Harvey Ltd [PDF, 195 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 103 McPherson v Carter Holt Harvey Ltd (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 22 August 2017) LEAVE ENTITLEMENTS – transfer to new employer – cash-up offer – claim that payment inaccurate and misleading – Holidays Act applied – each type of leave calculation considered –Fair Trading Act s 12 not engaged – good faith not breached – challenge and removed claim dismissed.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 100 Lyttelton Port Company Ltd v Arthurs [PDF, 148 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 100 Lyttelton Port Co Ltd v Arthurs (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 21 August 2017) APPLICATIONS FOR STRIKE-OUT, DISCLOSURE – application to strike out affirmative defence of discrimination – withdrawn by agreement – disclosure sought to support disparity argument does not exist – application dismissed.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 102 Kaipara District Council v McKerchar [PDF, 176 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 102 Kaipara District Council v McKerchar (Costs Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 18 August 2017) COSTS – two applications for strike-out – mixed success – plaintiff’s claim more complex – possible to separate issues – reasonable costs carefully considered - $14,000 costs plus disbursements awarded to defendant.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 101 Nath v Advance International Cleaning Systems (NZ) Ltd [PDF, 217 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 101 Nath v Advance International Cleaning Systems (NZ) Ltd (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 17 August 2017) UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – non-de-novo hearing principles discussed – admissibility of evidence – dismissal or resignation – compensation for loss of a benefit – $16,500 compensation for hurt and humiliation – mitigation for lost remuneration discussed – three months’ lost wages awarded.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 99 The NZ King Salmon Co Ltd v Slotemaker [PDF, 150 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 99 The New Zealand King Salmon Co Ltd v Slotemaker (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 16 August 2017) REDUNDANCY– INTEREST - defendant took up alternative position before termination of redundant position – no redundancy triggered – therefore no award of interest considered.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 98 Farmer Motor Group Ltd v McKenzie [PDF, 167 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 98 Farmer Motor Group Ltd v McKenzie (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 15 August 2017) 90-DAY TRIAL PERIOD – whether notice provisions were complied with – relevant legislation examined – case law considered – payment in lieu of notice not a valid substitute for written notice – challenge dismissed.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 97 Nel v ASB Bank [PDF, 216 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 97 Nel v ASB Bank Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Judge B A Corkill, 10 August 2017) DISPARITY – STAY OF DISCOVERY ORDERS – STRIKE-OUT – authorities on disparity surveyed – “truly parallel circumstances” considered – analysis of disparity case-specific – standard of “sufficient similarity” – strike-out application dismissed - whether orders for discovery should be stayed pending outcome of appeal – orders stayed.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 96 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd Interlocutory judgment (No 23) [PDF, 246 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 96 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment (No 23) of Judge B A Corkill, 4 August 2017)DISCOVERY- JOINDER – STRIKE-OUT – seeking documents on costs, funding and authorisation to file affidavits – application dismissed with reasons – strike-out application – adjourned for further submissions – application for joinder – set for telephone hearing.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 95 Fraser v McDonalds and Doran v Carrick [PDF, 355 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 95 Fraser v McDonalds & Doran v Carrick (Judgment of the Full Court, 4 August 2017) SECTION 67D AVAILABILITY PROVISION – whether ‘flexible shift’ arrangement was availability clause – IEAs included mix of secure and ‘flexible hours based on availability – on facts, mutuality of obligations - not one-sided – therefore clause did not meet requirements of s 67D
-
[2017] NZEmpC 94 Crimson Consulting Ltd v Berry [PDF, 268 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 94 Crimson Consulting Ltd v Berry (Judgment of Judge Corkill, 3 August 2017 (but publicised 29 August 2017) NON-PUBLICATION - jurisdiction to challenge Authority determination on interim non-publication orders – proper test for non-publication discussed – commercial sensitivity – irrelevance to proceedings - in camera hearing application – costs determination of Authority replaced - $2,250 in costs for Authority investigation
-
[2017] NZEmpC 93 Lal v The Warehouse Ltd [PDF, 125 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 93 Lal v The Warehouse Ltd (Costs Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 3 August 2017) COSTS – no evidence adduced to support a reduction in costs due to financial hardship – no evidence adduced to support payment by instalments – defendant awarded costs of $20,684 including disbursements.
-
[2017] EmpC 92 P v A [PDF, 111 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 92 P v A (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 28 July 2017) LEAVE TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE STATEMENT OF DEFENCE – case law examined – relevant principles considered – close consideration of merits unwarranted due to administrative error – application granted.
-
[2017] EmpC 90 Nathan v Broadspectrum (NZ) Ltd (formerly Transfield) [PDF, 148 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 90 Nathan v Broadspectrum (New Zealand) Ltd (formerly Transfield Services (New Zealand) Ltd) (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 28 July 2017) COMPLIANCE - defendant in breach of order of reinstatement to “active duties” – factors in assessing level of fine considered - $10,000 fine awarded against defendant, 50% to be paid to plaintiff.
-
[2017] EmpC 91 Singh v Trustees of the Wellington Rudolf Steiner Kindergarten [PDF, 70 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 91 Singh v Trustees of the Wellington Rudolf Steiner Kindergarten Trust (Costs Judgment of Judge M E Perkins) COSTS – substantial discount - $9,732.63 in favour of defendant