You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.

Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Search results

3640 items matching your search terms

  1. [2017] NZEmpC 115 Schollum and Hastings v Corporate Consumables Ltd [PDF, 598 KB]

    [2017] NZEmpC 115 Schollum v Corporate Consumables Ltd (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 27 September 2017) HOLIDAY PAY – commission excluded from calculation – consideration of statutory interpretation – law on interpretation of Holidays Act considered -  whether agreement to pay was reached – estoppels principles considered -  liability only, not quantum, established in this judgment – defendant liable for arrears for breaches of Holidays Act.

  2. [2017] NZEmpC 101 Nath v Advance International Cleaning Systems (NZ) Ltd [PDF, 217 KB]

    [2017] NZEmpC 101 Nath v Advance International Cleaning Systems (NZ) Ltd (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 17 August 2017) UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – non-de-novo hearing principles discussed – admissibility of evidence – dismissal or resignation – compensation for loss of a benefit – $16,500 compensation for hurt and humiliation – mitigation for lost remuneration discussed – three months’ lost wages awarded.

  3. [2017] NZEmpC 97 Nel v ASB Bank [PDF, 216 KB]

    [2017] NZEmpC 97 Nel v ASB Bank Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Judge B A Corkill, 10 August 2017) DISPARITY – STAY OF DISCOVERY ORDERS – STRIKE-OUT – authorities on disparity surveyed – “truly parallel circumstances” considered – analysis of disparity case-specific – standard of “sufficient similarity” – strike-out application dismissed - whether orders for discovery should be stayed pending outcome of appeal – orders stayed.

  4. [2017] NZEmpC 94 Crimson Consulting Ltd v Berry [PDF, 268 KB]

    [2017] NZEmpC 94 Crimson Consulting Ltd v Berry (Judgment of Judge Corkill, 3 August 2017 (but publicised 29 August 2017) NON-PUBLICATION -  jurisdiction to challenge Authority determination on interim non-publication orders – proper test for non-publication discussed – commercial sensitivity – irrelevance to proceedings -  in camera hearing application – costs determination of Authority replaced - $2,250 in costs for Authority investigation