[2017] NZEmpC 125 Moss Application for access to Court documents (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 16 October 2017) ACCESS TO COURT DOCUMENTS – hearing incomplete – sensitive information – not appropriate to inspect Court file.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3610 items matching your search terms
-
[2017] NZEmpC 125 Moss Application for access to Court documents [PDF, 109 KB] -
[2017] EmpC 124 Sunair Aviation v Walters [PDF, 175 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 124 Sunair Aviation Ltd v Walters (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 12 October 2017) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE A CHALLENGE – relevant factors considered – overall justice considered – application declined.
-
[2017] EmpC 123 Quality Consumables Ltd v Hannah [PDF, 73 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 123 Quality Consumables Ltd v Hannah (Costs Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 10 October 2017) COSTS – defendant awarded $7,309 including GST.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 122 Centraus Ltd v Barcena [PDF, 130 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 122 Centraus Ltd v Barcena (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 4 October 2017) APPLICATION FOR SEARCH ORDERS – principles considered – requirements satisfied – scope narrowed – orders granted.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 121 Marryatt v Silver Ridge Group Ltd (Reasons) [PDF, 241 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 121 Marryatt v Silver Ridge Group Ltd (Reasons for Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 3 October 2017)
-
[2017] NZEmpC 120 Judea Tavern Ltd v Jesson [PDF, 158 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 120 Judea Tavern Ltd v Jesson (Costs Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 3 October 2017) COSTS – GST considered – a factor in determining whether uplift appropriate – reasonable costs in Authority can be determined by Court – costs of $8,625 on challenge, and $5,175 in Authority awarded against plaintiff.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 119 Marryatt v Silver Ridge Group Ltd [PDF, 61 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 119 Marryatt v Silver Ridge Group Ltd (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 2 October 2017) FREEZING ORDER – non-publication until review date of one week from order.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 118 - Nathan v Broadspectrum (NZ) Ltd [PDF, 380 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 118 Nathan v Broadspectrum (New Zealand) Ltd (formerly Transfield Services (New Zealand) Ltd) (Costs Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 29 September 2017) COSTS – starting point is Guideline Scale, not actual costs – indemnity costs appropriate – costs of $25,300 plus disbursements awarded; plus costs of further proceeding and for seeking further orders; and for stay application – total of $48,272.13.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 117 Underhill v Coca-Cola Amatil NZ Ltd [PDF, 429 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 117 Underhill v Coca-Cola Amatil (NZ) Ltd (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 28 September 2017) UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – WHETHER GRIEVANCE RAISED OUT OF TIME – performance issues while employed – dismissal - consideration of when grievance was raised – 90 days started when written notice of termination provided, giving reasons– grievance raised within time – procedural defects – unjustified dismissal – reinstatement not practicable or reasonable- $1,200 awarded to each plaintiff – reduced by 25% for contribution.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 116 Nathan v Broadspectrum [PDF, 310 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 116 Nathan v Broadspectrum (New Zealand) Ltd (formerly Transfield Services (New Zealand) Ltd Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 27 September 2017) APPLICATION FOR FURTHER ORDERS FOR A FINE FOLLOWING COMPLIANCE ORDER – compliance order ordering return to active duties breached - further non-compliance – fine sought – deliberate default – fine ordered of $25,000, of which $10,000 to be paid to plaintiff.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 115 Schollum and Hastings v Corporate Consumables Ltd [PDF, 598 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 115 Schollum v Corporate Consumables Ltd (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 27 September 2017) HOLIDAY PAY – commission excluded from calculation – consideration of statutory interpretation – law on interpretation of Holidays Act considered - whether agreement to pay was reached – estoppels principles considered - liability only, not quantum, established in this judgment – defendant liable for arrears for breaches of Holidays Act.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 114 Quality Consumables Ltd v Hannah [PDF, 167 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 114 Quality Consumables Ltd v Hannah (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 26 September 2017) APPLICATION FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS – consideration of stay principles – stay of enforcement of determination granted on condition that plaintiff pay to defendant sum of $15,000 – balance of award to be paid to Registry pending further order of the Court – costs on application to be paid to defendant.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 113 Unite Union Inc v Restaurant Brands Ltd [PDF, 306 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 113 Unite Union Inc v Restaurant Brands Ltd (Costs Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 25 September 2017) COSTS – Court’s guideline scale does not overrule discretion – not a test case - $10,000 awarded against plaintiff – no order for costs on costs.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 112 Chevelle Motors Ltd v Cranswick [PDF, 99 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 112 Chevelle Motors Ltd v Cranswick (Costs Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 20 September 2017) COSTS – no costs memo received from plaintiff – reasonable expenses of Community Law Centre awarded - $1,200 costs against plaintiff to be paid to Community Law Centre.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 111 Sawyer v Vice Chancellor, Victoria University of Wellington [PDF, 98 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 111 Sawyer v Vice Chancellor, Victoria University of Wellington (Judgment of Judge Smith, 12 September 2017) APPLICATION FOR STAY OF AUTHORITY INVESTIGATION – leave to extend time to file challenge – whether stay should be granted before extension of time allowed – whether Court has jurisdiction under s 179(5).
-
[2017] NZEmpC 110 Below v The Salvation Army NZ Trust [PDF, 131 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 110 Below v Salvation Army (Judgment of Judge Corkill, 8 September 2017) COSTS – whether a test case and costs should lie where they fall – ability of party to pay - general principles of costs discussed - $7500 costs contribution ordered
-
[2017] NZEmpC 109 ALA v ITE [PDF, 162 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 109 ALA v ITE (Judgment of Judge Corkill, 1 September 2017) URGENT APPLICATION FOR TAKEDOWN ORDER – scope of powers under s 139(2) discussed – non-compliance with court orders – possibility of further sanctions.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 108 Chevelle Motors Ltd v Cranswick [PDF, 81 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 108 Chevelle Motors Ltd v Cranswick (Judgment of Judge Perkins, 29 August 2017) CHALLENGE DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 106 Crimson Consulting Ltd v Berry (No 2) [PDF, 100 KB] [2017] EmpC 106 Crimson Consulting Ltd v Berry (No 2) (Judgment of Judge Corkill, 29 August 2017) INTERIM ORDER FOR NON-PUBLICATION SPECIFIED – commercially sensitive information – irrelevant evidence.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 105 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd & Anor [PDF, 159 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 105 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd (Judgment No 24 of Judge Corkill, 28 August 2017) APPLICATION FOR DISCLOSURE AND JOINDER – potential abuse of process – principles for discretion to order joinder discussed – whether impecuniousness is required.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 104 Nathan v Broadspectrum (NZ) Ltd [PDF, 218 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 104 Nathan v Broadspectrum (NZ) Ltd (formerly Transfield Services (NZ) Ltd (Judgment of Judge Smith, 25 August 2017) APPLICATION FOR STAY – competency assessments after reinstatement ordered – health and safety issues – impact on third parties – jurisdiction to grant a stay discussed – principles of granting a stay discussed.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 103 McPherson v Carter Holt Harvey Ltd [PDF, 195 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 103 McPherson v Carter Holt Harvey Ltd (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 22 August 2017) LEAVE ENTITLEMENTS – transfer to new employer – cash-up offer – claim that payment inaccurate and misleading – Holidays Act applied – each type of leave calculation considered –Fair Trading Act s 12 not engaged – good faith not breached – challenge and removed claim dismissed.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 100 Lyttelton Port Company Ltd v Arthurs [PDF, 148 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 100 Lyttelton Port Co Ltd v Arthurs (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 21 August 2017) APPLICATIONS FOR STRIKE-OUT, DISCLOSURE – application to strike out affirmative defence of discrimination – withdrawn by agreement – disclosure sought to support disparity argument does not exist – application dismissed.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 102 Kaipara District Council v McKerchar [PDF, 176 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 102 Kaipara District Council v McKerchar (Costs Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 18 August 2017) COSTS – two applications for strike-out – mixed success – plaintiff’s claim more complex – possible to separate issues – reasonable costs carefully considered - $14,000 costs plus disbursements awarded to defendant.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 101 Nath v Advance International Cleaning Systems (NZ) Ltd [PDF, 217 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 101 Nath v Advance International Cleaning Systems (NZ) Ltd (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 17 August 2017) UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – non-de-novo hearing principles discussed – admissibility of evidence – dismissal or resignation – compensation for loss of a benefit – $16,500 compensation for hurt and humiliation – mitigation for lost remuneration discussed – three months’ lost wages awarded.