You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.

Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Search results

3610 items matching your search terms

  1. [2017] NZEmpC 144 CE of Social Development v Tuilaepa [PDF, 482 KB]

    [2017] NZEmpC 144 Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development v Tuilaepa (Costs Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 15 November 2017) COSTS – costs for both Court proceedings and Authority investigation – guideline scale for Court costs used classified as Category 2, Band B – Authority daily notional tariff used – Calderbank offer ineffective when the offeree was completely successful in the challenge – financial circumstances considered – Court costs $28,990 and Authority costs $11,000.

  2. [2017] NZEmpC 139 Dean v The Chief Executive of the Ministry for Primary Industries [PDF, 372 KB]

    [2017] NZEmpC 139 Dean v Chief Executive of the Ministry for Primary Industries (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 10 November 2017) CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION – calculating retiring leave – whether calculated upon base salary or actual wages paid for hours worked – whether there is commercial absurdity – business custom and practice discussed – plain and ordinary meanings of the words favoured.

  3. [2017] NZEmpC 132 Waikato District Health Board v Archibald [PDF, 457 KB]

    [2017] NZEmpC 132 Waikato District Health Board v Archibald (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 31 October 2017) UNJUSTIFIABLE DISMISSAL – whether employee entitled to severance payment when role changed to require 2 hours and 45 minutes a day of travel – arrangement was only temporary – travel was only during work hours – concerns about health and safety impacts – whether s 103(3) applies to exclude this from personal grievance procedures – insufficient consultation – travel requirements meant that the role was on less favourable terms – age of employee not to be taken into consideration – severance payment ordered in accordance with MECA – dismissal was unjustified –  compensation awards under s 123(1)(c)(i) discussed - “bands” approach created to measure appropriate compensation - $20,000 awarded for compensation.

  4. [2017] NZEmpC 130 ALA v ITE [PDF, 402 KB]

    [2017] NZEmpC 130 ALA v ITE (Oral Judgment (No 3) of Judge B A Corkill, 26 October 2017) BREACH OF COMPLIANCE ORDER – SANCTIONS – whether imprisonment appropriate – deliberate continuous and flagrant disregard of Court’s compliance orders – no steps taken to remedy the breach – need for deterrence of wilfully disobedient conduct considered – case law examined – defendant sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 21 days – committal order made under s 37(4) Corrections Act 2004 – permanent non-publication orders made – indemnity costs of $49,164 awarded.

  5. [2017] NZEmpC 128 ALA v ITE [PDF, 242 KB]

    [2017] NZEmpC 128 ALA v ITE (Oral Judgment (No 2) of Judge B A Corkill, 26 October 2017) BREACH OF COMPLIANCE ORDER – whether defendant failed to comply with compliance order for publications made on Facebook and YouTube – public interest justification considered – no countervailing public interest found – failure to obey take-down orders – multiple breaches found – Court to receive submissions as to applicable sanctions, indemnity costs and permanent non-publication orders.

  6. [2017] NZEmpC 127 South Canterbury District Health Board v Sanderson [PDF, 709 KB]

    [2017] NZEmpC 127 South Canterbury District Health Board v Sanderson (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 20 October 2017) ON CALL EMPLOYMENT STATUS – PAYMENT – sleepover principles applied – constraints on freedom present – nature and extent of responsibilities significant – significant benefit to employer – availability provisions considered – Minimum Wage Orders apply – correct formula for calculation decided.