[2018] NZEmpC 136 Mathews v Bay of Plenty District Health Board (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 16 November 2018) APPLICATION FOR AVL WITNESS APPEARANCE – ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE – AVL application granted – all challenged evidence allowed – Court will consider relevance.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3630 items matching your search terms
-
[2018] NZEmpC 136 Mathews v Bay of Plenty District Health Board [PDF, 174 KB] -
[2018] NZEmpC 135 Solid Roofing Ltd v Newman [PDF, 232 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 135 Solid Roofing Ltd v Newman (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Judge M E Perkins, 13 November 2018) APPLICATION FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS – inadequate evidence on financial state of plaintiff – stay granted on condition that full amount of awards are paid into Court - $5000 costs award to be paid direct to the defendant - costs of stay application against the plaintiff.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 134 Richora Group Ltd v Cheng [PDF, 185 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 134 Richora Group Ltd v Cheng (Costs Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 13 November 2018) COSTS - $13,468 in favour of defendant.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 133 Infinity Automotive Ltd v Lorigan [PDF, 267 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 133 Infinity Automotive Ltd v Lorigan (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 12 November 2018) COMPLIANCE ORDER- compliance sought on costs order – evidence of ongoing non-compliance – compliance order made – consequences of further non-compliance addressed – costs of application for compliance order of $500.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 132 Nicholson v Ford [PDF, 308 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 132 Nicholson v Ford (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 12 November 2018 PENALTY – AIDING AND ABETTING – QUANTUM – principles in applying and setting penalty considered – whether single course of conduct or multiple breaches – survey of penalty amounts - $7,500 penalty – 75% to defendant, 25% to Crown.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 130 Kocaturk v Zara’s Turkish Ltd [PDF, 222 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 130 Kocaturk v Zara’s Turkish Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 7 November 2018) SECURITY FOR COSTS – alleged residency outside New Zealand – alleged visa problems – alleged gambling problems – allegations are false – impecuniosity of employees caused by employer’s actions – employer has his own challenge - security for costs not ordered.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 128 Blue Water Hotel Ltd v VBS [PDF, 435 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 128 Blue Water Hotel Ltd v VBS (Judgment of the Full Court, 7 November 2018) EXTENSION OF TIME – whether there is discretion to extend time for personal grievance after 3 years – analysis of ss 114(6), 219(1) and 221 – time limit in s 114(6) is mandatory – Parliamentary history considered – policies behind limitation periods in general considered – lack of discretion to extend the period is s 114(6) must be deliberate by Parliament – ss 219 and 221 are part of the Court’s special jurisdiction – cases discussed – ss 219 and 221 cannot be used to extend the time limit in s 114(6) – challenge allowed.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 131 RPW v H [PDF, 244 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 131 RPW v H (Oral Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 6 November 2018) BREACH OF COMPLIANCE ORDER – FINE - $2,000 fine and $3,500 costs awarded against defendant – take-down order not made in the absence of argument.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 129 Secretary for Justice, MOJ v NZ PSA [PDF, 266 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 129 Secretary for Justice, for and on behalf of the Ministry of Justice v New Zealand Public Service Association (Oral Interlocutory Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 5 November 2018) STRIKE – INTERIM INJUNCTION – legal principles applied – application dismissed.
-
GSTech Ltd v A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment [PDF, 283 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 127 GSTech Ltd v A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (Costs Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 31 October 2018) COSTS – whether Labour Inspector action regarding minimum standards warrants special approach to costs – not appropriate in this instance – costs to follow the event – costs of $8,000 in Authority, $22,300 on the challenge - $1,000 costs on costs, plus disbursements.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 126 Johnstone v Kinetic Employment Ltd [PDF, 261 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 126 Johnstone v Kinetic Employment Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 26 October 2018) JURISDICTION – OBJECTION TO JURISDICTION - appropriate procedure for objection to jurisdiction – whether Authority has jurisdiction to order forensic examination of computers – whether Court has jurisdiction to challenge the Authority’s determination as to its jurisdiction to do that – whether s 179(5) prevents a challenge – Court may have jurisdiction – proceedings not dismissed – statement of defence to be filed.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 125 Rightway Ltd v Burwell [PDF, 263 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 125 Rightway Ltd v Burwell (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 26 October 2018) CHALLENGE TO AUTHORITY REMOVAL – whether Authority should have exercised discretion even when there was an important question of law – relative efficiencies of processes – related case already going through the Court – challenge dismissed.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 124 Kiwi Ink Construction Ltd v Hughes [PDF, 255 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 124 Kiwi Ink Construction Ltd v Hughes (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 23 October 2018) APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO CHALLENGE – delay of around five months – failure to participate at Authority – insufficient explanation for substantial delay – justice of the case – application declined.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 123 Roach v Nazareth Care Charitable Trust Board [PDF, 567 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 123 Roach v Nazareth Care Charitable Trust Board (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 19 October 2018) UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – 90-DAY TRIAL – DEFINITION OF EMPLOYEE – whether second employment agreement contained invalid trial period as plaintiff had been previously employed in first agreement – purpose of trial period is to observe work – second trial period valid – dismissal without notice did not comply with s 67B(1) – unjustifiable dismissal found – remedies of 12 months’ salary, compensation of $25,000.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 122 The Order of St John Northern Region Trust Board [PDF, 194 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 122 The Order of St John Northern Region Trust Board (Consent Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 16 October 2018) APPLICATION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION - joint application – granted on condition remedies be paid into the Court.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 121 Solid Roofing Ltd v Newman [PDF, 223 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 121 Solid Roofing Ltd v Newman (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 15 October 2018) GOOD FAITH REPORT – plaintiff failed to engage with Authority in good faith – hearing de novo ordered – leave granted for defendant to seek further particulars and for submissions in support of stay of execution.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 120 RPW v H and C [PDF, 231 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 120 RPW v H and C (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 11 October 2018) COMPLIANCE ORDER – NON-PUBLICATION ORDER – no statement of defence filed – hearing was formal proof – widespread evidence of breach of settlement agreement and compliance orders of the Authority – penalties are appropriate – quantum to be determined in later hearing.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 119 Tait v Robin [PDF, 187 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 119 Tait v Robin (Oral Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 10 October 2018) COMPLIANCE ORDER – amount still owing from remedies and costs previously awarded – parties agree to payment by instalments.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 118 Johnston v The Fletcher Construction Co Ltd [PDF, 156 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 118 Johnston v The Fletcher Construction Co Ltd (No 2) (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 9 October 2018) EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE EVIDENCE – counsel availability – prejudice to plaintiff for trial preparation – no possible amelioration of prejudice – limited extension granted.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 117 GEA Process Engineering Ltd v Schicker [PDF, 237 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 117 GEA Process Engineering Ltd v Schicker (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 2 October 2018) GOOD FAITH REPORT – legal principles applying – two determinations challenged and in conflict - inconclusive as to whether passive obstruction was failure of good faith – defendant’s costs to this point to be met by plaintiff – plaintiff to decide how to resolve conflicting challenges.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 116 Hollinshead v Davey [PDF, 237 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 116 Hollinshead v Davey (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 2 October 2018) APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING CHALLENGE - – delay not justifiable – matters will all be canvassed by original challenge anyway – application declined.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 115 Culturesafe NZ Ltd v Turuki Healthcare Services Charitable Trust [PDF, 235 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 115 Culturesafe NZ Ltd v Turuki Healthcare Services Charitable Trust (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 1 October 2018) GOOD FAITH REPORT – APPLICATION FOR STAY - compliance orders previously made by Authority – time expired for challenge application for stay of penalties and damages – – good faith report suggested breach - issues still to be canvassed at hearing involve important points of principle – stay allowed subject to strict conditions.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 112 Kazemi v Rightway Ltd [PDF, 289 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 112 Kazemi v Rightway Ltd (Costs Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 27 September 2018) COSTS – $1,500 awarded for Authority costs plus filing fee - $6,913 exclusive of GST set for special leave application – no fee for obtaining judgment without appearance – costs of $6,690 granted to defendant for effort in responding to challenge which was not discontinued though replaced with special leave application – modest costs allowed for challenge to costs determination – total incl GST of $2,757.44.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 113 Richora Group Ltd v Cheng [PDF, 396 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 113 Richora Group Ltd v Cheng (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 26 September 2018) UNJUSTIFIABLE CONSTRUCTIVE DISMISSAL – no employment agreement until point of dismissal – no process for investigating allegation – post-employment actions of employer –three months lost remuneration plus unpaid wages ordered – factors in assessing quantum of compensation considered – high end harm - greater compensation than claimed could not be awarded – $20,000 ordered in favour of defendant.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 111 Hines v Eastland Port Ltd [PDF, 256 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 111 Hines v Eastland Port Ltd (Costs Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 25 September 2018) COSTS – plaintiff to pay $22,000 costs in Authority – some amounts of court costs disputed – legal research not disbursements – Interest on Money Claims Act does not apply - $32,000.50 for Court costs awarded against plaintiffs, plus disbursements and expert’s fees.