[2019] NZEmpC 25 TUV v Chief Executive of the New Zealand Defence Force (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 12 March 2019) APPLICATION FOR STAY OF DETERMINING COSTS – Court of Appeal has granted leave to appeal – plaintiff was partly successful – settings costs would not be straightforward – stay granted.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3630 items matching your search terms
-
[2019] NZEmpC 25 TUV v Chief Executive of the New Zealand Defence Force [PDF, 219 KB] -
[2019] NZEmpC 24 Blue Water Hotel Ltd v VBS [PDF, 370 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 24 Blue Water Hotel Ltd v VBS (Costs Judgment of Full Court, 6 March 2019) COSTS – defendant was legally aided – whether there were exceptional circumstances – delay was reasonable and explained – merits were not hopeless – no legal rights against advisors – no exceptional circumstances – whether there could be an order against counsel – no possible basis for such an order – whether an order could be made under s 45(5) of Legal Services Act – whether court should exercise discretion - case was a test case – costs should lie where they fall.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 23 Rachelle v Air New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 437 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 23 Rachelle v Air New Zealand Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 5 March 2019) APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT PART OF APPLICATION – whether grievances were raised within 90 days – events were more than 90 days before any grievance was raised – grievances were out of time – unjustified dismissal claim may be out of time – plaintiff given opportunity to amend pleading.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 22 Zhang v Telco Asset Management Ltd [PDF, 319 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 22 Zhang v Telco Asset Management Ltd (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 4 March 2019) LEAVE TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE CHALLENGE – difficulty finding a lawyer – applicant was proactive – length of delay approximately average – respondent suffered some prejudice by delay – merits neither strong nor hopeless – factors finely balanced – application narrowly granted.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 21 Davey v Hollinshead [PDF, 183 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 21 Davey v Hollinshead (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 4 March 2019) CONSENT – judicial settlement conference completed – settlement agreement confidential.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 20 Jacks Hardware and Timber Ltd v First Union Inc [PDF, 537 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 20 Jacks Hardware and Timber Ltd v First Union Inc (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 28 February 2019) FACILITATION – BREACH OF GOOD FAITH - FIXING – whether Authority correct to order fixing of terms of collective agreement - consideration of grounds in s 50J – breach must be “sufficiently serious” and sustained to undermine bargaining – offer of further mediation not reasonable – fixing only effective remedy – challenge dismissed.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 19 Waste Management New Zealand Ltd v Jones [PDF, 321 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 19 Waste Management New Zealand Ltd v Jones (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 28 February 2019) APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE STATEMENT OF DEFENCE – consented to by plaintiff – granted.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 18 Watts & Hughes Construction Ltd v De Buyzer [PDF, 315 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 18 Watts & Hughes Construction Ltd v De Buyzer (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 27 February 2019) APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PAYMENT INTO COURT – STRIKEOUT APPLICATION – payment to court not made through inadvertent error – paid late - wasted costs and disbursements paid to defendant – strikeout application for only part of the challenge – principles of strikeout and of abuse of process considered – application declined.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 17 Morgan v Tranzit Coachlines Wairarapa Ltd [PDF, 202 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 17 Morgan v Tranzit Coachlines Wairarapa Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 18 February 2019) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY TO POSITIVE DEFENCES – plaintiff out of time to reply to positive defences – counsel unaware of time limitation – application is close to substantive hearing but will not take up additional time in the hearing – no potential prejudice – leave granted.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 16 Moody v Chamberlain [PDF, 256 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 16 Moody v Chamberlain (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 15 February 2019) APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LITIGATION GUARDIAN – requirements of High Court Rules – affidavit evidence needed for one respondent – whether hybrid model appropriate – litigation guardian appointed under HCR 4.29, 4.38.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 15 Downer NZ Ltd v Livingstone [PDF, 226 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 15 Downer NZ Ltd v Livingstone (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 14 February 2019) CALCULATION OF FINAL PAY – different methods of calculating monthly salary considered – employment agreement considered – challenge successful.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 14 ESKA Ltd v Beloous [PDF, 282 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 14 ESKA Ltd v Beloous (interlocutory Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 12 February 2019 APPLICATION FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS – no basis for stay to be ordered – plaintiff in precarious financial position – order for stay declined – costs of $350.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 11 Hawkes Bay District Health Board v Trewick [PDF, 239 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 11 Hawkes Bay District Health Board v Trewick (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 11 February 2019) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE CHALLENGE OUT OF TIME – error in calculating time was minor and delay minimal – application granted.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 13 Rayner v Director-General of Health [PDF, 281 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 13 Rayner v Director-General of Health (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 11 February 2019) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE CHALLENGE OUT OF TIME – consideration of factors to weigh up – application granted
-
[2019] NZEmpC 12 A Labour Inspector v Daleson Investment Ltd [PDF, 376 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 12 A Labour Inspector v Daleson Investment Ltd (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 11 February 2019) QUANTUM OF PENALTY – S 174E - whether Authority erred in setting penalty – whether reasons given by Authority were adequate to meet s 174E - examination of steps in assessing penalty - brevity of determination and rationale not adequate – penalty uplifted to $40,000
-
[2019] NZEmpC 10 123 Casino Ltd v Zuo [PDF, 299 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 10 123 Casino Ltd t/a 123 Palm Bar & Restaurant & Function Centre v Zuo (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 11 February 2019) APPLICATION TO EXTEND TIME – failure to file statement of defence was oversight and minor – application granted
-
[2019] NZEmpC 9 Prasad v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 351 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 9 Prasad v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 8 February 2019) APPLICATION FOR ACCESS TO COURT DOCUMENTS- considerations in granting access considered – application declined.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 8 Miller v Commissioner of Police [PDF, 292 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 8 Miller v Commissioner of Police (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 4 February 2019) APPLICATION FOR A STAY OF EXECUTION – APPLICATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE A CHALLENGE – delay to file challenge was short and reason is adequate – application is granted – parties consent to stay.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 7 Sawyer v The Vice-Chancellor of Victoria University of Wellington [PDF, 336 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 7 Sawyer v Vice-Chancellor of Victoria University of Wellington (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 4 February 2019) APPLICATION FOR ACCESS TO COURT DOCUMENTS – parties do not object to application – principles must still be considered – application is for a legitimate purpose – application granted.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 6 Cornish Trucks and Van Ltd v Gildenhuys [PDF, 279 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 6 Cornish Truck & Van Ltd v Gildenhuys (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 4 February 2019) UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – whether employee was dismissed or resigned – contradiction in evidence between parties – employee version of events more credible – employee was unjustifiably dismissed - $6000 awarded for lost wages – for compensation, the statement of defence only asked for $7000 – compensation cannot be higher than requested in pleadings – compensation cannot be for post-employment conduct of the employer - $7000 awarded for compensation – no reduction made for contribution.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 5 Hatcher v Burgess Crowley Civil Ltd [PDF, 268 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 5 Hatcher v Burgess Crowley Civil Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 4 February 2019) APPLICATION AS TO SCOPE OF CHALLENGE – whether statement of claim raises issues beyond those dealt with by the Authority – issue was raised in the Authority but Member declined to investigate it - definition of the word “matter” – the issues were an aspect of the matter before the Authority, albeit un-investigated.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 4 Aslan Farms Ltd v Johnstone [PDF, 280 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 4 Aslan Farms Ltd v Johnstone (Consent Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 30 January 2019) CONSENT – parties reached agreed terms of settlement – publication of the contents is prohibited.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 3 NZPPTA v BOT for Rodney College [PDF, 165 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 3 New Zealand Post Primary Teachers’ Association v Board of Trustees for Rodney College (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 29 January 2019) APPLICATION FOR VERIFICATION ORDER – alleged documents not disclosed – no affidavit asserting that all documents are disclosed – verification order granted.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 2 Clearkin v Geneva Healthcare Ltd [PDF, 276 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 2 Clearkin v Geneva Healthcare Ltd (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 23 January 2019) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE CHALLENGE – interests of justice considered – application granted.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 1 Postal Workers Union of Aotearoa Inc v New Zealand Post Ltd [PDF, 222 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 1 Postal Workers Union of Aotearoa Inc v New Zealand Post Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 22 January 2019) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FURTHER EVIDENCE – relevance of evidence – application granted.