[2019] NZEmpC 62 Adams v Paper Plus NZ Ltd (Consent Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 20 May 2019) CHALLENGE – CONSENT.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3648 items matching your search terms
-
[2019] NZEmpC 62 Adams v Paper Plus NZ Ltd [PDF, 279 KB] -
[2019] NZEmpC 61 Reborn Holdings Ltd v Sharan [PDF, 242 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 61 Reborn Holdings Ltd v Sharan (Costs Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 20 May 2019) COSTS – proceedings were discontinued – plaintiff in the process of liquidation – plaintiff used legal aid.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 60 Sexton v Lowe [PDF, 216 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 60 Sexton v Lowe (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 16 May 2019) OBJECTION TO DISCLOSURE – relevance of sought documents.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 59 Kazemi v Rightway Ltd [PDF, 446 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 59 Kazemi v Rightway Ltd (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 15 May 2019) Judgment reissued with new judgment number [2019] NZEmpC 73 and dated 11 June 2019 EMPLOYMENT PREMIUM – employee needed to pay $125,000 as buy-in fee to partnership scheme – test for whether a premium applied – whether benefit gained aside from employment – misrepresentation – breach of contract – whether contract is illegal – penalty imposed – costs.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 58 New Zealand Tramways and Public Passenger Transport Employees’ Union v Cityline (NZ) Ltd [PDF, 226 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 58 New Zealand Tramways and Public Passenger Transport Employees’ Union v Cityline (NZ) Ltd (Costs Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 15 May 2019) COSTS – costs guideline scale – whether a test case.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 57 Cornish Truck & Van Ltd v Gildenhuys [PDF, 235 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 57 Cornish Truck & Van Ltd v Gildenhuys (Costs Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 15 May 2019) COSTS – costs guideline scale – whether relevant that counsel not a solicitor.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 56 Boyd v Blanchard [PDF, 200 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 56 Boyd v Blanchard (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 13 May 2019) APPLICATION FOR STAY – financial position of both parties considered – prejudice to defendant.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 55 Samuels v Employment Relations Authority [PDF, 148 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 55 Samuels v Employment Relations Authority (Consent Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 13 May 2019) APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT PART OF PLEADINGS – consent.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 54 Hong v Auckland Transport [PDF, 437 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 54 Hong v Auckland Transport (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 10 May 2019) UNJUSTIFIED SUSPENSION – REINSTATEMENT – REMEDIES – dismissal agreed to be unjustified – three separate suspensions – whether reinstatement practicable and reasonable – no evidence of reasonable deterioration of trust and confidence – compensation and lost wages awarded – reduction for contribution.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 53 CBA v ONM [PDF, 284 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 53 CBA v ONM (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 7 May 2019) APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT OF URGENT FIXTURE – return to work arrangements – unforeseen difficulties –payment to be paid during the interim.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 52 Derbie v Tranzurban Hutt Valley Ltd [PDF, 224 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 52 Derbie v Tranzurban Hutt Valley Ltd (Costs Judgment of Chief Judge B A Corkill, 7 May 2019) COSTS – CONSENT.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 51 Goleman Wellington Cleaning Ltd v Nicolle [PDF, 330 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 51 Goleman Wellington Cleaning Ltd v Nicolle (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 3 May 2019) APPLICATION FOR STAY – principles for granting a stay considered – factors favour granting a stay.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 50 Metropolitan Glass & Glazing Ltd v A Labour Inspector [PDF, 198 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 50 Metropolitan Glass & Glazing Ltd v A Labour Inspector (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 3 May 2019) APPLICATION FOR NON-PUBLICATION ORDER – parties in agreement – identities of employees not relevant – potential prejudicial consequences if identities revealed.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 49 Mathews v Bay of Plenty District Health Board [PDF, 449 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 49 Mathews v Bay of Plenty District Health Board (Judgment of the Full Court, 2 May 2019) CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION – RETIREMENT GRATUITY – whether employee entitled to retirement gratuity – whether the retirement gratuity is discretionary – whether employee actually retired.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 48 Sawyer v The Vice-Chancellor of Victoria University of Wellington [PDF, 370 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 48 Sawyer v The Vice-Chancellor of Victoria University of Wellington (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 2 May 2019) APPLICATION FOR STAY – PROCEEDINGS IN ANOTHER COURT – stay principles considered - application to confirm identity of parties – application for directions on whether counsel can represent parties.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 47 [Media Release] Postal Workers Union of Aotearoa Inc v New Zealand Post Ltd [PDF, 178 KB] Media Release [2019] NZEmpC 47 Postal Workers Union of Aotearoa Inc v New Zealand Post Ltd
-
[2019] NZEmpC 47 Postal Workers Union of Aotearoa Inc v New Zealand Post Ltd [PDF, 349 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 47 Postal Workers Union of Aotearoa Inc v New Zealand Post Ltd (Judgment of the Full Court, 2 May 2019) AVAILABILITY PROVISION – whether s 67D intended to only apply to zero-hour contracts – whether compulsory overtime provisions amount to availability provision – whether employees on a salary that includes reasonable compensation for availability.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 46 Southern District Health Board v Glasson [PDF, 457 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 46 Southern District Health Board v Glasson (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 30 April 2019) COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT – COVERAGE – which collective agreement covers the employee – nature of employee’s work – whether employee entitled to back pay.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 45 Chambers v Pelabon [PDF, 347 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 45 Chambers v Pelabon (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 18 April 2019) COMPLIANCE ORDER – whether compliance should be ordered against holding company and director – good faith issue during Authority investigation – challenge limited to certain issues – whether Lawrence Publishing Co of New Zealand Ltd is applicable under Employment Relations Act 2000 – compliance can be ordered not only against employer – compliance ordered against holding company and director.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 44 Clarke v GEA Processing Engineering Ltd [PDF, 245 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 44 Clarke v GEA Processing Engineering Ltd (Costs Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 12 April 2019) COSTS – claim was discontinued – r 15.23 of High Court Rules applied – costs guideline scale applied.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 43 Moody v Chamberlain [PDF, 241 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 43 Moody v Chamberlain (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 9 April 2019) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR AND BE HEARD – application by New Zealand Council of Trade Unions and Human Rights Commission – opposed by Attorney-General – case could have far-reaching consequences – both applicants have proper interest in the matter – leave granted.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 42 McNabb v Silver Fern Farms Ltd [PDF, 253 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 42 McNabb v Silver Fern Farms Ltd (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 8 April 2019) APPLICATION FOR A VERIFICATION ORDER AND FURTHER DISCOVERY – whether documents are relevant – documents are relevant to remedies and should be disclosed.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 41 Renaissance Assets Management Ltd v Ge [PDF, 350 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 41 Renaissance Assets Management Ltd v Ge (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 5 April 2019) APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT PROCEEDINGS – challenge to two Authority determinations – whether statement of claim discloses no reasonable cause of action – parties had significant disagreements – issues cannot be resolved in a summary way – proceedings not struck out.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 40 Berry v The Chief Executive of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment [PDF, 328 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 40 Berry v The Chief Executive of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 5 April 2019) APPLICATION FOR DECLARATION OF BREACH OF GOOD FAITH – investigation of complaint by employee – whether investigation flawed – whether Court has jurisdiction to make declaration of good faith – no flaw in investigation – no breach of good faith.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 39 Rachelle v Air New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 373 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 39 Rachelle v Air New Zealand Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 4 April 2019) APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT PART OF PROCEEDING – unjustified dismissal claim not raised within 90 days – opportunity to amend statement of claim not taken – claim struck out.