[2019] NZEmpC 49 Mathews v Bay of Plenty District Health Board (Judgment of the Full Court, 2 May 2019) CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION – RETIREMENT GRATUITY – whether employee entitled to retirement gratuity – whether the retirement gratuity is discretionary – whether employee actually retired.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3610 items matching your search terms
-
[2019] NZEmpC 49 Mathews v Bay of Plenty District Health Board [PDF, 449 KB] -
[2019] NZEmpC 48 Sawyer v The Vice-Chancellor of Victoria University of Wellington [PDF, 370 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 48 Sawyer v The Vice-Chancellor of Victoria University of Wellington (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 2 May 2019) APPLICATION FOR STAY – PROCEEDINGS IN ANOTHER COURT – stay principles considered - application to confirm identity of parties – application for directions on whether counsel can represent parties.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 47 [Media Release] Postal Workers Union of Aotearoa Inc v New Zealand Post Ltd [PDF, 178 KB] Media Release [2019] NZEmpC 47 Postal Workers Union of Aotearoa Inc v New Zealand Post Ltd
-
[2019] NZEmpC 47 Postal Workers Union of Aotearoa Inc v New Zealand Post Ltd [PDF, 349 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 47 Postal Workers Union of Aotearoa Inc v New Zealand Post Ltd (Judgment of the Full Court, 2 May 2019) AVAILABILITY PROVISION – whether s 67D intended to only apply to zero-hour contracts – whether compulsory overtime provisions amount to availability provision – whether employees on a salary that includes reasonable compensation for availability.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 46 Southern District Health Board v Glasson [PDF, 457 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 46 Southern District Health Board v Glasson (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 30 April 2019) COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT – COVERAGE – which collective agreement covers the employee – nature of employee’s work – whether employee entitled to back pay.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 45 Chambers v Pelabon [PDF, 347 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 45 Chambers v Pelabon (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 18 April 2019) COMPLIANCE ORDER – whether compliance should be ordered against holding company and director – good faith issue during Authority investigation – challenge limited to certain issues – whether Lawrence Publishing Co of New Zealand Ltd is applicable under Employment Relations Act 2000 – compliance can be ordered not only against employer – compliance ordered against holding company and director.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 44 Clarke v GEA Processing Engineering Ltd [PDF, 245 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 44 Clarke v GEA Processing Engineering Ltd (Costs Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 12 April 2019) COSTS – claim was discontinued – r 15.23 of High Court Rules applied – costs guideline scale applied.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 43 Moody v Chamberlain [PDF, 241 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 43 Moody v Chamberlain (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 9 April 2019) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR AND BE HEARD – application by New Zealand Council of Trade Unions and Human Rights Commission – opposed by Attorney-General – case could have far-reaching consequences – both applicants have proper interest in the matter – leave granted.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 42 McNabb v Silver Fern Farms Ltd [PDF, 253 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 42 McNabb v Silver Fern Farms Ltd (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 8 April 2019) APPLICATION FOR A VERIFICATION ORDER AND FURTHER DISCOVERY – whether documents are relevant – documents are relevant to remedies and should be disclosed.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 41 Renaissance Assets Management Ltd v Ge [PDF, 350 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 41 Renaissance Assets Management Ltd v Ge (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 5 April 2019) APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT PROCEEDINGS – challenge to two Authority determinations – whether statement of claim discloses no reasonable cause of action – parties had significant disagreements – issues cannot be resolved in a summary way – proceedings not struck out.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 40 Berry v The Chief Executive of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment [PDF, 328 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 40 Berry v The Chief Executive of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 5 April 2019) APPLICATION FOR DECLARATION OF BREACH OF GOOD FAITH – investigation of complaint by employee – whether investigation flawed – whether Court has jurisdiction to make declaration of good faith – no flaw in investigation – no breach of good faith.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 39 Rachelle v Air New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 373 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 39 Rachelle v Air New Zealand Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 4 April 2019) APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT PART OF PROCEEDING – unjustified dismissal claim not raised within 90 days – opportunity to amend statement of claim not taken – claim struck out.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 38 EPB Ltd v OST [PDF, 225 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 38 EPB Ltd v OST (Consent Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 3 April 2019) APPLICATION FOR STAY OF CHALLENGE – CONSENT.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 37 Derbie v Tranzurban Hutt Valley Ltd [PDF, 674 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 37 Derbie v Tranzurban Hutt Valley Ltd (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 3 April 2019) ENTITLEMENT TO REST BREAKS – Land Transport Rules on rest breaks considered – whether LTA rules prevail over ERA rest break provisions – regimes should apply side-by-side – whether operational issues eliminate most breaks – whether appropriate access to toilets – rest breaks are compliant with ERA.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 36 Application for access to court documents [PDF, 190 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 36 Application for access to court documents (Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 2 April 2019) APPLICATION FOR ACCESS TO COURT DOCUMENTS – applicant is MBIE – research on equal pay – not opposed – application granted.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 35 Elisara v Alliance New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 239 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 35 Elisara v Allianz New Zealand Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 29 March 2019) APPLICATION FOR ORDER OF SUPPLEMENTARY AFFIDAVIT –affidavit inadequate – supplementary affidavit to be filed.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 34 Emmerson v Northland District Health Board [PDF, 908 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 34 Emmerson v Northland District Health Board (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 28 March 2019) PERSONAL GRIEVANCE – UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – BULLYING – UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – performance concerns – alleged drug use – serious misconduct because of improper prescription – whether grievances were raised within time – whether a continuous course of conduct – failure to provide supervision and training amounted to a disadvantage – incidents were exaggerated and did not amount to bullying – dismissal was unjustified because of lack of consideration of alternatives to dismissal and consideration given to allegations that were not investigated – remedies for unjustified dismissal reduced to 0 for reasons of equity and good conscience – remedies for unjustified disadvantage reduced for contribution.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 33 Opai v Commissioner of Police [PDF, 188 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 33 Opai v Commissioner of Police (Interlocutory Chief Judge C Inglis, 25 March 2019) APPLICATION FOR STAY OF CHALLENGE – CONSENT.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 32 Canterbury Concrete Cutting NZ Ltd v Nicol [PDF, 295 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 32 Canterbury Concrete Cutting New Zealand Ltd v Nicol (Consent Interlocutory Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 25 March 2019) APPLICATION FOR STAY OF AUTHORITY DETERMINATION – CONSENT.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 31 Talbot Agriculture Ltd v Wate [PDF, 495 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 31 Talbot Agriculture Ltd v Wate (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 22 March 2019) UNJUSTIED DISMISSAL – TRIAL PERIOD – whether there was an employment relationship before trial period was signed – whether employee was a volunteer – whether employee’s dismissal was justified under s 103A – inadequate consultation about performance concerns – employee was unjustifiably dismissed.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 30 Nicholson v Ford [PDF, 213 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 30 Nicholson v Ford (Costs Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 22 March 2019) COSTS – costs guideline scale – whether plaintiff won by reducing penalties rather than eliminating them – novel issues arose – plaintiff breached good faith – costs not intended to punish.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 29 Wendco (NZ) Ltd v Unite Inc [PDF, 220 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 29 Wendco (NZ) Ltd v Unite Inc (Costs Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 21 March 2019) COSTS – proceedings were discontinued after successful facilitation – High Court rules discussed – guideline scale applied.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 28 Waste Management NZ Ltd v Jones [PDF, 292 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 28 Waste Management NZ Ltd v Jones (Consent Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 15 March 2019) CONSENT – parties agreed to a stay.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 27 Barbara Buckett & Assoc t/a Buckett Law v Farani [PDF, 206 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 27 Barbara Buckett & Assoc t/a Buckett Law v Farani (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 13 March 2019) APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTED SERVICE – difficulties serving statement of claim on defendant – delay in making application – application granted.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 26 Moody v Chamberlain [PDF, 226 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 26 Moody v Chamberlain (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 12 March 2019) APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LITIGATION GUARDIAN – whether party meets both limbs of incapacitation – application granted.