[2019] NZEmpC 87 Tourism Holdings Limited v A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 26 July 2019) DECLARATION - Holidays Act 2003 – Meaning of “regular” – s 8(2) Holidays Act 2003 – No requirement to include in the calculation of ordinary weekly pay commission payments received during the four-week period preceding annual holiday.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3648 items matching your search terms
-
[2019] NZEmpC 87 Tourism Holdings Ltd v A Labour Inspector of MBIE [PDF, 393 KB] -
[2019] NZEmpC 86 Lyttleton Port Company Ltd v Pender [PDF, 325 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 86 Lyttleton Port Company Ltd v Pender (Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 26 July 2019) UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION – Appointment to vacancy – Crane drivers – EVIDENCE – relevance – Application dismissed
-
[2019] NZEmpC 85 Sawyer v The Vice-Chancellor of Victoria University of Wellington [PDF, 323 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 85 Sawyer v The Vice-Chancellor of Victoria University of Wellington (Costs judgement of Judge K G Smith, 19 July 2019) COSTS – guideline scale – uplift awarded
-
[2019] NZEmpC 84 Sawyer v The Vice-Chancellor of Victoria University of Wellington [PDF, 313 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 84 Sawyer v The Vice-Chancellor of Victoria University of Wellington (Costs judgement of Judge K G Smith, 19 July 2019) COSTS – guideline scale
-
[2019] NZEmpC 83 Pitman v Advanced Personnel Services Ltd [PDF, 374 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 83 Pitman v Advanced Personnel Services Ltd (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 15 July 2019) NON-DE NOVO CHALLENGES – RESTRAINT OF TRADE – DAMAGES – INDEMNITY CLAUSE – COSTS – s 238 Employment Relations Act 2000.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 82 Stonewood Group Limited v McAlpine [PDF, 221 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 82 Stonewood Group Limited v McAlpine (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 5 July 2019) APPLICATION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION – application granted.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 81 Emmanuel v Waikato District Health Board [PDF, 300 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 81 Emmanuel v Waikato District Health Board (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 4 July 2019) UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – employee timeliness issues – previous warnings – misleading statements by employee – whether process was fair – whether summary dismissal was warranted.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 80 Postal Workers Union of Aotearoa Inc v New Zealand Post Ltd [PDF, 240 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 80 Postal Workers Union of Aotearoa Inc v New Zealand Post Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 4 July 2019) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO MAKE ADDITIONAL SUBMISSIONS – evidence given at related hearing changed understanding of the issues – whether the Court has jurisdiction – whether new evidence has probative value.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 79 Watts & Hughes Construction Ltd v De Buyzer [PDF, 202 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 79 Watts & Hughes Construction Ltd v De Buyzer (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 1 July 2019) APPLICATION FOR NON-PUBLICATION ORDERS – principle of open justice.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 78 Surplus Brokers Ltd v Armstrong [PDF, 193 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 78 Surplus Brokers Ltd v Armstrong (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 1 July 2019) APPLICATION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION – consent.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 77 Sawyer v Vice-Chancellor of Victoria University of Wellington [PDF, 331 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 77 Sawyer v Vice-Chancellor of Victoria University of Wellington (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 28 June 2019) APPLICATION FOR RECUSAL – no legal justification given for recusal.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 76 Surplus Brokers Ltd v Armstrong [PDF, 193 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 76 Surplus Brokers Ltd v Armstrong (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 28 June 2019) APPLICATION FOR STAY – stay initially consented to – notice of opposition not filed in time.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 75 Horizon Concepts Ltd v Hayward [PDF, 435 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 75 Horizon Concepts Ltd v Hayward (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 24 June 2019) WHETHER EMPLOYEE OR CONTRACTOR – parties initially in an employment relationship – parties intended to switch to independent contractor relationship – tests considered.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 74 Labour Inspector v Matangi Berry Farm Ltd [PDF, 216 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 74 Labour Inspector v Matangi Berry Farm Ltd (Interim Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 14 June 2019) MINIMUM EMPLOYMENT ENTITLEMENTS – arrears of wages – holiday pay – public holiday pay – consent.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 73 Kazemi v Rightway Ltd [PDF, 446 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 73 Kazemi v Rightway Ltd (Reissued Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 11 June 2019) EMPLOYMENT PREMIUM – employee needed to pay $125,000 as buy-in fee to partnership scheme – test for whether a premium applied – whether benefit gained aside from employment – misrepresentation – breach of contract – whether contract is illegal – penalty imposed – costs.
-
2019-NZEmpC-72-Kazemi-v-RightWay-Ltd-and-ors-Recall-Judgment.pdf [PDF, 192 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 72 Kazemi v Rightway Ltd (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 11 June 2019) APPLICATION FOR RECALL – High court Rule r 11.9 – application not opposed.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 71 McNabb v Silver Fern Farms Ltd [PDF, 211 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 71 McNabb v Silver Fern Farms Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 11 June 2019) APPLICATION FOR “UNLESS” ORDERS – non-compliance with court orders – failure not deliberate.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 70 Miller v Commissioner of Police [PDF, 280 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 70 Miller v Commissioner of Police (Consent Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 5 June 2019) CONSENT
-
[2019] NZEmpC 69 Goleman Wellington Cleaning Ltd v Nicolle [PDF, 310 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 69 Goleman Wellington Cleaning Ltd v Nicolle (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 4 June 2019) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE A CHALLENGE – APPLICATION TO VARY A STAY – company failed to challenge costs determination in time – whether extension is in the interests of justice.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 68 Randle v The Warehouse Ltd [PDF, 248 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 68 Randle v The Warehouse Ltd (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 30 May 2019) APPLICATION TO REOPEN AUTHORITY INVESTIGATION – NEW EVIDENCE – whether necessary to avoid miscarriage of justice – whether evidence could have been obtained during original investigation – strength and relevance of evidence.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 67 Hokotehi Maori Trust v Prater [PDF, 379 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 67 Hokotehi Maori Trust v Prater (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 30 May 2019) APPLICATION TO RAISE GRIEVANCE OUT OF TIME – EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES – whether trauma affected ability to raise grievance in time – whether agent unreasonably delayed – delay was only two days.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 66 Morgan v Tranzit Coachlines Wairarapa Ltd [PDF, 261 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 66 Morgan v Tranzit Coachlines Wairarapa Ltd (Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 28 May 2019) FIXED-TERM EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT – VALIDITY – whether relying on uncertain funding streams is genuine reason – whether funding concerns are reasonable – whether alternatives to fixed-term agreement available.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 65 Rayner v Director-General of Health [PDF, 795 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 65 Rayner v Director-General of Health (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 27 May 2019) UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – UNJUSTIFIED SUSPENSION – employee investigated for fraudulent qualifications – refusal to participate in employer investigation for privacy reasons – breach of privacy – remedies – compensation bands – whether reinstatement reasonable and practicable – tense relationship with managers after investigation process.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 64 Avondale College Board of Trustees v Maday [PDF, 235 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 64 Avondale College Board of Trustees v Maday (Consent Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 24 May 2019) APPLICATION FOR STAY - CONSENT.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 63 Auckland Council v Drought [PDF, 279 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 63 Auckland Council v Drought (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 24 May 2019) APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT CHALLENGE – MOOT – Authority determination based on two separate grounds, only one of which is challenged – whether challenge abuse of process or a collateral attack – whether challenge should be heard despite being moot.