[2019] NZEmpC 142 Morgan v Tranzit Coachlines Wairarapa Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of B A Corkill, 10 October 2109) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE NOTICE OF OPPOSITION – delay explained – extension reasonable – application granted
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3642 items matching your search terms
-
[2019] NZEmpC 142 Morgan v Tranzit Coachlines Wairarapa Ltd [PDF, 364 KB] -
[2019] NZEmpC 140 Sfizio Ltd v Mawhinney [PDF, 404 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 140 Sfizio Ltd v Mawhinney (Interlocutory Judgment of B A Corkill, 9 October 2109) APPLICATION FOR STRIKE OUT - Application for stay - Application for security for costs - Applications dismissed
-
[2019] NZEmpC 139 Zara’s Turkish Ltd v Kocaturk [PDF, 372 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 139 Zara’s Turkish Ltd v Kocaturk (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 8 October 2019) APPLICATION FOR JOINDER – application to join directors personally as defendant in second of two proceedings – not joined at Authority – question of identity of employer not raised earlier – no grounds to lift corporate veil – application declined.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 138 Eska Co Ltd [PDF, 212 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 138 Eska Co Ltd (formerly known as Eska Ltd) v Beloous (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Judge J C Holden, 8 October 2109) APPLICATION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS – previous evidence of company’s precarious position – $7000 security for costs awarded - to be paid into the Court.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 137 Independent Prosperity Ltd v Huang [PDF, 343 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 137 Independent Prosperity Ltd v Huang (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 8 October 2019) APPLICATION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION – evidence of fast-growing, solvent company – factors in stay considered – application declined.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 136 Mero Business Ltd v Wood [PDF, 275 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 136 Mero Business Ltd v Wood (Judgment of Judge K G smith, 7 October 2019) STRIKE-OUT FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION - application needed in order to serve overseas respondent – several efforts by Registry to elicit application – unless order given - no application made – struck out.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 135 Mani v Sharma [PDF, 189 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 135 Mani v Sharma (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 4 October 2019) STRIKE OUT – order for security for costs ignored – second plaintiff in liquidation – liquidators request strike-out – no response received – challenge dismissed in entirety.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 134 Serforntein v Airways Corp of NZ Ltd [PDF, 349 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 134 Serforntein v Airways Corp of NZ Ltd (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 1 October 2019) DISCONTINUANCE – WANT OF PROSECUTION.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 133 Roberts v Airways Corp of NZ Ltd [PDF, 348 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 133 Roberts v Airways Corp of NZ Ltd (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 1 October 2019) DISCONTINUANCE – WANT OF PROSECUTION.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 132 Chief Executive of Manukau Institute of Technology v Zivaljevic [PDF, 300 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 132 Chief Executive of Manukau Institute of Technology v Zivaljevic (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 25 September 2019) WHETHER GRIEVANCE RAISED WITHIN 90 DAYS – WHETHER EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT COMPLIED WITH STATUTE – whether communications following end of employment constituted raising of a grievance – found to meet requirements – Authority to proceed with substantive investigation – explanation of grievance procedure not in plain language and therefore not compliant with the Act and is an exceptional circumstance contemplated by s 115(c).
-
[2019] NZEmpC 131 Galvanising (H.B.) Ltd v Hare [PDF, 348 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 131 Galvanising (H.B.) Ltd v Hare (Consent judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 25 September 2019) CONSENT – monetary orders made – other terms confidential – order prohibiting publication of balance of settlement terms.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 130 Packwood v ANZ Bank New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 494 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 130 Packwood v ANZ Bank New Zealand Ltd (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 23 September 2019) APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT PROCEEDINGS – settlement during Authority proceeding – no reasonably arguable claim of duress – strike out principles considered – binding settlement is full and final – claim struck out.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 129 A v N Ltd [PDF, 291 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 129 A v N Ltd (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 17 September 2019) UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – REMEDIES – drug testing – drug testing policy created just to test employee suspected of drugs – dismissal not substantively or procedurally justified – lost wages awarded.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 128 Horizon Concepts Ltd v Hayward [PDF, 318 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 128 Horizon Concepts Ltd v Hayward (Costs Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 17 September 2019) COSTS – GUIDELINE SCALE – inability to pay only relevant for recoverability, not quantum.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 127 Byrne v New Zealand Transport Agency [PDF, 216 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 127 Byrne v New Zealand Transport Agency (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 13 September 2019) APPLICATION FOR STAY OF COSTS DETERMINATION – difficulty in making the payment – repayments in monthly parts ordered.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 126 Postal Workers Union of Aotearoa Inc v New Zealand Post Ltd [PDF, 341 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 126 Postal Workers Union of Aotearoa Inc v New Zealand Post Ltd (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 11 September 2019) OVERTIME – CONTRACT INTERPRETATION – whether overtime is calculated over a week, offset by paid non-work hours, or whether all overtime must be paid – held that work done beyond rostered daily hours counts as overtime and is not to be offset against hours paid but not worked on other days.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 125 Emmanuel v Waikato District Health Board [PDF, 226 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 125 Emmanuel v Waikato District Health Board (Costs Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 10 September 2019) COSTS – Calderbank offer rejected leading to increased costs – costs of $16,159 ordered in favour of successful defendant
-
[2019] NZEmpC 124 Alkazaz v Asparona Ltd [PDF, 210 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 124 Alkazaz v Asparona Ltd (Interlocutory Judgement of Judge M E Perkins, 9 September 2019) APPLICATION FOR STAY – application for disclosure of documents and identification of defendants.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 123 Elisara v Allianz New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 319 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 123 Elisara v Allianz New Zealand Ltd (Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 6 September 2019) UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – serious misconduct – disparity of treatment – predetermination – failure to provide relevant information – opportunity to have legal representation – lack of preliminary decision – non-publication orders.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 122 Bay of Plenty District Health Board v CultureSafe NZ Ltd [PDF, 407 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 122 Bay of Plenty District Health Board v CultureSafe NZ Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 6 September 2019) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE STATEMENT OF DEFENCE OUT OF TIME – Application granted.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 121 Shaw v Bay Of Plenty District Health Board [PDF, 544 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 121 Shaw v Bay Of Plenty District Health Board (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 6 September 2019) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE CHALLENGE OUT OF TIME – Application granted.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 120 Amcor Flexibles (New Zealand) Ltd v Hunter [PDF, 282 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 120 Amcor Flexibles (New Zealand) Ltd v Hunter (Consent Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 5 September 2019) CHALLENGE – CONSENT
-
[2019] NZEmpC 119 Leota v Parcel Express Ltd [PDF, 199 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 119 Leota v Parcel Express Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 5 September 2019) APPLICATION FOR ACCESS TO COURT DOCUMENTS – opposition based on concern about applying to intervene are not appropriate – application granted.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 118 Lorigan v Infinity Automotive Ltd [PDF, 421 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 118 Lorigan v Infinity Automotive Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 5 September 2019) BREACH OF COMPLIANCE ORDER – SANCTIONS – employee refuses to pay costs ordered – other proceedings stayed – fine not appropriate.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 117 Hatcher v Burgess Crowley Civil Ltd [PDF, 264 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 117 Hatcher v Burgess Crowley Civil Ltd (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 4 September 2019) HOLIDAYS – RECORD-KEEPING –records need not be kept beyond six years – reverse onus of proof not activated.