[2019] NZEmpC 179 Batchelor Construction Ltd t/a Handrail Solutions Ltd (Consent Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 5 December 2019) APPLICATION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION – stay by consent
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3615 items matching your search terms
-
[2019] NZEmpC 179 Batchelor Construction Ltd v Alleyne [PDF, 293 KB] -
[2019] NZEmpC 178 Johnston v The Fletcher Construction Co Ltd [PDF, 340 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 178 Johnston v The Fletcher Construction Company Ltd (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 4 December 2019) UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – redundancy – point of redundancy not reached – no unjustified disadvantage – no breach of good faith – contract affirmed – no constructive dismissal – Wages Protection Act 1983 – Holidays Act 2003 – holiday pay owed.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 177 Burwell v Rightway Ltd [PDF, 84 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 177 Burwell v Rightway Ltd (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 4 December 2019) CONSENT JUDGMENT
-
[2019] NZEmpC 176 Allied Petroleum Ltd v First Union Inc [PDF, 95 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 176 Allied Petroleum Ltd v First Union Inc (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 28 November 2019) APPLICATION FOR URGENCY – application for interim injunction to prevent strike action – urgency granted – change of venue granted.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 175 Zhang v Telco Asset Management Ltd [PDF, 184 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 175 Zhang v Telco Asset Management Ltd (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 28 November 2019) APPLICATION FOR RECALL – slip in judgment corrected – not satisfied grounds for recall made out – application dismissed.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 174 Clearkin v Geneva Healthcare Ltd [PDF, 194 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 174 Clearkin v Geneva Healthcare Ltd (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 26 November 2019) STRIKEOUT – settlement agreement – further claims raised – abuse of Court’s process – claims struck out.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 173 Allied Investments Ltd v Flowers [PDF, 387 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 173 Allied Investments Ltd v Flowers (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 25 November 2019) HOLIDAYS ACT 2003 – transfer of part of public holiday – agreement did not satisfy requirements of s 44A Holidays Act 2003.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 172 Cowan v Idea Services Ltd [PDF, 356 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 172 Cowan v Idea Services Ltd (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 25 November 2019) CHALLENGE – unjustified dismissal – serious misconduct – decision could have been reached by a fair and reasonable employer in the circumstances – challenged dismissed.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 170 Shalini Ltd v A Labour Inspector [PDF, 137 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 170 Shalini Ltd v A Labour Inspector (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 22 November 2019) APPLICATION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION – penalty from Authority of $100,000 – question of inability to pay – important for company to keep trading – stay granted on condition of paying $30,000 into the Court.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 171 Thorne v Rolton [PDF, 352 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 171 Thorne v Rolton (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 22 November 2019) CHALLENGE – unjustified dismissal – dismissed via text message – dismissal not in accordance with s103A – challenged dismissed.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 169 Rauland NZ Ltd v Delvo [PDF, 123 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 169 Rauland NZ Ltd v Delvo (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 21 November 2019) REMOVAL FROM AUTHORITY– application for search order completed – Court role ended - substantive matter not filed at Authority until after application for search order – removal on mistaken grounds - referred back to Authority.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 168 Zhang v Telco Asset Management Ltd [PDF, 164 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 168 Zhang v Telco Asset Management Ltd (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 20 November 2019) RE-ISSUE – slip rule – inadvertent error – reg 6 Employment Court Regulations 2000 – r 11.10 High Court Rules 2016.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 167 Bradley v Ngāti Apa Ki Te Rā Tō Charitable Trust [PDF, 424 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 167 Bradley v Ngāti Apa Ki Te Rā Tō Charitable Trust (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 20 November 2019) CHALLENGE – unjustified constructive dismissal – breach of good faith – investigation into allegations not premature and no improper motive – no breach of good faith – entitled to take resignation at face value – challenged dismissed – NON-PUBLICATION ORDER – Non-publication of name of manager and identifying details.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 166 GEA Process Engineering Ltd v Schicker [PDF, 216 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 166 GEA Process Engineering Ltd v Schicker (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 18 November 2019) CHALLENGE – APPLICATION TO REOPEN AUTHORITY INVESTIGATION – APPLICATION FOR RECUSAL OF AUTHORITY MEMBER - Authority had dismissed the proceedings without investigation – complexity of evidentiary issues – disclosure – delay in the Authority – role and function of Authority – investigation reopened.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 165 New Zealand Compliance and Repairs Ltd v Mistry [PDF, 113 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 165 New Zealand Compliance and Repairs Ltd v Mistry (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 15 November 2019) COSTS – proceedings had been dismissed for want of prosecution – costs guideline scale applied.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 164 Packwood v ANZ Bank New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 202 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 164 Packwood v ANZ Bank New Zealand Ltd (Costs Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 14 November 2019) COSTS –successful strikeout – ability to pay – financial circumstances relevant – guideline scale considered - costs awarded.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 163 May v Solidbuilt Construction 2017 Ltd [PDF, 103 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 163 May v Solidbuilt Construction 2017 Ltd (Consent Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 13 November 2019) CONSENT.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 162 Leota v Parcel Express Ltd [PDF, 92 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 162 Leota v Parcel Express Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 13 November 2019) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FURTHER EVIDENCE – broader interests of justice – no real prejudice.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 161 Saunders v The Chief Executive of the Inland Revenue Department [PDF, 115 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 161 Saunders v The Chief Executive of the Inland Revenue Department (Costs Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 13 November 2019) COSTS ON APPLICATION FOR STAY OF PROCEEDING – application withdrawn – costs order not opposed – costs awarded.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 160 Leota v Parcel Express Ltd [PDF, 211 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 160 Leota v Parcel Express Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 12 November 2019) EVIDENCE – ADMISSIBILITY – hearsay – relevance – opinion evidence – equity and good conscience considered – evidence allowed but to be given appropriate weight.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 159 Allied Investments Ltd t/a Allied Security v Cradock [PDF, 350 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 159 Allied Investments Ltd t/a Allied Security v Cradock (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 11 November 2019) CHALLENGE – unjustified dismissal – 90-day trial period – contract provided for “immediate” termination of employment during trail period – whether immediate termination valid notice – notice of the termination means giving advance notice – dismissal unjustified – challenge dismissed – sections 67A and 67B Employment Relations Act 2000.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 158 Ward v Concrete Structures (NZ) Ltd [PDF, 196 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 158 Ward v Concrete Structures (NZ) Ltd (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 11 November 2019) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE CHALLENGE – applicant instructed advocate to file challenged – advocate did not do so – application brought promptly once failure discovered – no significant prejudice – application granted.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 157 Van Kleef v Alliance Group Ltd [PDF, 475 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 157 Van Kleef v Alliance Group Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 7 November 2019) APPLICATION FOR DISCLOSURE – disclosure principles considered – categories of requested documents considered – disclosure ordered – privilege a separate issue – to be dealt with by affidavit.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 156 Radford v Chief of New Zealand Defence Force [PDF, 388 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 156 Radford v Chief of New Zealand Defence Force (Interlocutory Judgement of Judge B A Corkill, 7 November 2019) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR AND BE HEARD – preliminary question of jurisdiction – MFAT seeks leave to appear as intervener – issue affects wide number of people – leave granted.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 155 George Weston Foods (NZ) Ltd v First Union Inc [PDF, 237 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 155 George Weston Foods (NZ) Ltd v First Union Inc (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 6 November 2019) CHALLENGE TO REDACTION OF DISCLOSED DOCUMENTS – two documents in dispute – one document not covered by privilege – unredacted copy ordered – redactions in second document relevant – discoverable in full – not to be shared at this stage.