[2020] NZEmpC 18 Kenny Omen Ltd v Singh (Stay Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 2 March 2020) Company has been liquidated and liquidators are not interested in the proceeding – proceedings stayed.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3642 items matching your search terms
-
[2020] NZEmpC 18 Kenny Omen Ltd v Singh [PDF, 292 KB] -
[2020] NZEmpC 16 Evans v JNJ Management Ltd [PDF, 138 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 16 Evans v JNJ Management Ltd (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 2 March 2020) APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME – deadline was missed by one day – application would only not be granted if case could be considered hopeless – case is not hopeless – application granted.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 17 Canterbury Westland Free Kindergarten Assoc Inc v Barnes [PDF, 124 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 17 Canterbury Westland Free Kindergarten Assoc Inc v Barnes (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 27 February 2020) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE – dispute involving the interpretation or operation of a collective agreement – union party and Secretary for Education had proper interest in the interpretation of issue – leave granted.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 15 Jobbitt v 4 Seasons Indoor Outdoor Living (2014) Ltd [PDF, 634 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 15 Jobbitt v 4 Seasons Indoor Outdoor Living (2014) Ltd (Costs Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 27 February 2020) COSTS – costs guideline scale not appropriate because of brevity of submissions - $4,000 awarded.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 14 Thorne v Rolton [PDF, 310 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 14 Thorne v Rolton (Costs Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 26 February 2020) COSTS – COSTS GUIDELINE SCALE.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 13 Elisara v Allianz New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 223 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 13 Elisara v Allianz New Zealand Ltd (Costs Judgment of Judge Chief Judge C Inglis, 26 February 2020) COSTS – costs guideline scale – adjustments made for Calderbank offer – award not reduced for reasons of ability of pay – Authority costs award discussed – whether Authority’s notional daily rate is generally appropriate.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 12 Cooper v Phoenix Publishing Ltd [PDF, 302 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 12 Cooper v Phoenix Publishing Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment No.3 of Judge K G Smith, 21 February 2020) APPLICATION FOR WASTED COSTS – costs awarded.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 11 Cooper v Phoenix Publishing Ltd [PDF, 222 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 11 Cooper v Phoenix Publishing Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment No.2 of Judge K G Smith, 21 February 2020) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO DEFEND – statement of defence not filed on time – company did not file application and did not attend conference – proceeding struck out for want of prosecution.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 10 Holland v OCS Ltd [PDF, 291 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 10 Holland v OCS Ltd (Oral Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 21 February 2020) PERSONAL GRIEVANCE – TIME LIMITATION – grievance lodged in the Authority outside of the s 114(6) limitation period – challenge cannot proceed.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 9 Zhang v Telco Asset Management Ltd [PDF, 236 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 9 Zhang v Telco Asset Management Ltd (Costs Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 20 February 2020) COSTS – costs guideline scale – Calderbank offer – rejection of Calderbank offer appropriate because sum awarded was significantly higher than offer – employee only partially successful – 25% of normal costs awarded.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 8 Visagie v WorkSafe New Zealand [PDF, 136 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 8 Visagie v WorkSafe New Zealand (Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 18 February 2020) APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO REMOVE PROCEEDINGS TO THE COURT – important question of law regarding interpretation of collective agreement – availability of damages for breach of good faith – Authority well placed to deal with the matter – leave
-
[2020] NZEmpC 7 Adventure Playground Rotorua Ltd v Isaac [PDF, 129 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 7 Adventure Playground Rotorua Ltd v Isaac (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 18 February 2020) GOOD FAITH REPORT – company delayed investigation initially but eventually engaged with the process – not appropriate to limit the ambit of the challenge.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 6 Dollar King Ltd v Jun [PDF, 105 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 6 Dollar King Ltd v Jun (Consent Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 17 February 2020) APPLICATION FOR STAY – CONSENT.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 5 Duncan v Southern Milk Transport Ltd [PDF, 316 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 5 Duncan v Southern Milk Transport Ltd (Costs Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 17 February 2020) COSTS – GUIDELINE SCALE.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 4 Innovative Landscapes (2015) Ltd v Popkin [PDF, 137 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 4 Innovative Landscapes (2015) Ltd v Popkin (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 10 February 2020) APPLICATION TO HEAR EVIDENCE AT A DISTANCE – evidence via audio-visual link – Courts (Remote Participation) Act 2010, s 5 – fair trial – application granted.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 3 Canterbury Westland Kindergarten Assoc Inc v Barnes [PDF, 127 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 3 Canterbury Westland Kindergarten Assoc Inc v Barnes (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 7 February 2020) APPLICATION FOR STAY – potential difficulty repaying award – stay granted.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 2 A Labour Inspector v Jeet Holdings [PDF, 264 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 2 A Labour Inspector v Jeet Holdings (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 31 January 2020) APPLICATION FOR VARIATION OF A FREEZING ORDER – creditor has security over property – initial freezing order prevented sale of property – order varied to allow sale.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 1 Tupuanga v Auckland Meat Processors Ltd [PDF, 120 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 1 Tupuanga v Auckland Meat Processors Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 28 January 2020) APPLICATION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS – no evidence of impecuniosity – application dismissed.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 198 Jobbitt v 4 Seasons Indoor Outdoor Living (2014) Ltd [PDF, 379 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 198 Jobbitt v 4 Seasons Indoor Outdoor Living (2014) Ltd (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 20 December 2019) STRIKE OUT – 90 day trial period – whether proper notice was given of dismissal – termination notice referred to clause but not exact period of leave – notice was valid – strike out application successful.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 192 Johnson v Chief of the New Zealand Defence Force [PDF, 394 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 192 Johnson v Chief of the New Zealand Defence Force (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 19 December 2019) UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – alleged sending of critical email – no action taken but assumption that allegation true - law on disadvantage considered – plaintiff put to burden of proof – inadequate enquiry – plaintiff was unjustifiably disadvantaged - $20,000 compensation plus 50% contribution to costs – interest – recommendation under s 123(1)(ca).
-
[2019] NZEmpC 197 Suncorp New Zealand Employees Ltd v Timms [PDF, 104 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 197 Suncorp New Zealand Employees Ltd v Timms (Consent Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 19 December 2019) CONSENT – terms confidential - proceedings discontinued.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 196 A v N Ltd [PDF, 130 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 196 A v N Ltd (Costs Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 19 December 2019) COSTS – COSTS AT AUTHORITY – CALDERBANK – costs of $10,000 in respect of both Authority and Court proceedings.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 195 The Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections v JCE [PDF, 377 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 195 The Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections v JCE (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 19 December 2019) STRIKE OUT APPLICATION – Authority findings on Corrections staffing – whether matter is moot – meaning considered – strike out application successful.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 194 Labour Inspector v Jeet Holdings Ltd and ors [PDF, 101 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 194 A Labour Inspector v Jeet Holdings Ltd (Oral Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 19 December 2019) RENEWING AND CONTINUING FREEZING ORDER – order continued until lifted by the Court
-
[2019] NZEmpC 193 Ikundabose v McWatt Group Ltd [PDF, 214 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 193 Ikundabose v McWatt Group Ltd (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 18 December 2019) REDUNDANCY – UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – NON-PUBLICATION - whether redundancy not genuine – redundancy principles considered – redundancy for genuine reasons - procedure fair – no grounds for non-publication – challenge dismissed.