[2020] NZEmpC 46 JCE v The Department of Corrections (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 17 April 2020) REMEDIES – the Authority awarded $30,000 for hurt and humiliation for unjustified disadvantage – employee suffers PTSD and depression from assault during employment – Authority failed to consider breach of contract damages separately from compensation for personal grievance – compensation increased to $65,000 – the Authority awarded $26,061.54 for lost remuneration – Authority was correct to deduct ACC payments because the employer was an accredited employer.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3630 items matching your search terms
-
[2020] NZEmpC 46 JCE v The Department of Corrections [PDF, 321 KB] -
[2020] NZEmpC 45 Williams v Rural Livestock Ltd [PDF, 307 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 45 Williams v Rural Livestock Ltd (Stay Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 16 April 2020) APPLICATION FOR STAY – plaintiff has pending criminal charges – delay caused by COVID-19 – stay granted.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 43 A Labour Inspector v Matangi Berry Farm Ltd [PDF, 423 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 43 A Labour Inspector v Matangi Berry Farm Ltd (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 16 April 2020) PENALTIES – QUANTUM - serious breaches under part 9A – breaches were in regard to many workers – workers were vulnerable – penalties had to be globalised to keep maximum figures realistic – Preet methodology applied - combined penalties of $127,200 awarded against the company and its director.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 44 Hong v Chevron Traffic Services Ltd [PDF, 203 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 44 Hong v Chevron Traffic Services Ltd (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 15 April 2020) UNJUSTIFIABLE DISMISSAL – SERIOUS MISCONDUCT – employer’s investigation and conclusion were reasonable – dismissal was justifiable – PENALTIES – company was in breach of holiday pay entitlements for casual workers – breach was accidental and does not merit a penalty.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 40 Innovative Landscapes (2015) Ltd v Popkin [PDF, 398 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 40 Innovative Landscapes (2015) Ltd v Popkin (Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 14 April 2020) UNJUSTIFIABLE DISMISSAL – REDUNDANCY – redundancy was genuine but process was insufficient – dismissal was therefore unjustifiable – one week’s unpaid wages awarded –employer’s financial circumstances do not impact on quantum of compensation - $15,000 awarded for compensation.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 42 Alkazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd [PDF, 348 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 42 Alkazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 14 April 2020) APPLICATION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS – plaintiff filed a challenge to Authority’s decision not to reopen its investigation – plaintiff does not currently reside in New Zealand – merits of the challenge are weak – plaintiff’s past conduct causes concern about validity of challenge – security for costs ordered.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 41 Barnes v Canterbury Westland Kindergarten Association Inc [PDF, 229 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 41 Barnes v Canterbury Westland Kindergarten Association Inc (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 14 April 2020) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO VACATE FIXTURE – plaintiff has health issues - all parties consent – application granted.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 39 Metropolitan Glass & Glazing Ltd v Labour Inspector [PDF, 283 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 39 Metropolitan Glass & Glazing Ltd v Labour Inspector (Judgment of the full Court, 14 April 2020) ANNUAL HOLIDAYS – INCENTIVE PAYMENTS – whether the company’s short term incentive scheme should be counted under gross earnings – scheme was described as discretionary and was argued to be separate to employment agreements – scheme was actually incorporated into the agreement and had contractual force –description of scheme as discretionary is not relevant – CLOSEDOWN PERIOD – employee’s entitlements when not entitled to annual leave during a closedown period – statute allows only one approach – company was not following that approach.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 38 Goleman Wellington Cleaning Ltd v Nicolle [PDF, 323 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 38 Goleman Wellington Cleaning Ltd v Nicolle (Costs Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 6 April 2020) COSTS – substantive proceedings withdrawn – costs guideline scale – uplift made because of GST status – uplift made because of rejection of settlement offer.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 37 Kang v Lee [PDF, 353 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 37 Kang v Lee (Reasons Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 27 March 2020) FREEZING ORDER – ANCILLARY ORDER – orders previously granted – director of employer company alleged to be liable for unpaid wages and holiday pay – director allegedly needed to travel to South Korea – test for granting freezing order considered.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 36 Carrigan v Attorney-General [PDF, 115 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 36 Carrigan v Attorney-General (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Chief Judge C Inglis, 25 March 2020) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR AS INTERVENOR – Human Rights Council applied to intervene – parties consent – leave granted.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 35 Arachchige v Rasier NZ Ltd and Uber B.V. [PDF, 142 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 35 Arachige v Rasier New Zealand Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 19 March 2020) APPLICATION TO ADJOURN HEARING – COVID-19 travel restrictions prevent defendants from attending hearing – interests of justice require adjournment – adjournment granted.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 34 Byrne v The New Zealand Transport Agency [PDF, 247 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 34 Byrne v The New Zealand Transport Agency (Costs Judgment of Judge B A Corkilll, 18 March 2020) COSTS IN THE AUTHORITY – DAILY TARIFF – costs reduced because of conduct that unnecessarily increased costs – Calderbank offer was reasonably rejected – COSTS IN THE COURT – COSTS GUIDELINE SCALE.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 33 Carrigan v The Attorney-General [PDF, 101 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 33 Carrigan v Attorney-General (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 17 March 2020) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PLEADINGS – APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR AS INTERVENOR – New Zealand Council of Trade Unions requested to intervene – no objection by either party – application granted - New Zealand Human Rights Council given extension to file an application to intervene.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 32 Kocaturk v Zara’s Turkish Ltd [PDF, 351 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 32 Kocaturk v Zara’s Turkish Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 13 March 2020) APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT PART OF PROCEEDING – Court did not have jurisdiction to hear claims of breach of the Bill of Rights Act – Court did not have jurisdiction to hear claims of breach of the Human Rights Act – breach of good faith claims and Limitation Act not adequately pleaded but not struck out – statement of claim to be amended.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 31 Zara's Turkish Ltd v Kocaturk [PDF, 357 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 31 Zara’s Turkish Ltd v Kocaturk (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 13 March 2020) APPLICATION FOR NON-PARTY DISCOVERY – immigration files sought from Immigration New Zealand – parts of discovery sought are too broad and amount to fishing, or are irrelevant – application partially granted.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 30 Samuels v Employment Relations Authority [PDF, 163 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 30 Samuels v Employment Relations Authority (Interlocutory Judgment (No 4) of Chief Judge C Inglis, 13 March 2020) EVIDENCE – ADMISSIBILITY – documents are privileged and irrelevant – covert recording of Authority also irrelevant – evidence not admitted.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 29 Maharaja India Ltd v A Labour Inspector [PDF, 204 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 29 Maharaja India Ltd v A Labour Inspector (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 12 March 2020) APPLICATION FOR STRIKE OUT – employer had no standing to challenge Authority determination because he was bankrupt – Official Assignee had no interest in the challenge – proceedings struck out.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 28 Talbot Agriculture Ltd v Wate [PDF, 368 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 28 Talbot Agriculture Ltd v Wate (Remedies Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 11 March 2020) REMEDIES FOR UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – calculation of how much wages are owed – no evidence of loss for reimbursement of lost wages.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 27 Labour Inspector (MacRury) v Cypress Villas Ltd [PDF, 162 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 27 Labour Inspector (MacRury) v Cypress Villas Ltd (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 11 March 2020) PENALTIES – LIABILITY OF COMPANY DIRECTOR UNDER S 234 - no evidence that director had knowledge of employment entitlement breaches - director cannot be found to be jointly liable – action by the Labour Inspector dismissed.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 26 Gibson-Smith v Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment [PDF, 223 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 26 Gibson-Smith v Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 10 March 2020) APPLICATION TO ADDUCE FURTHER EVIDENCE – case was already closed – Evidence Act and High Court Rules discussed – evidence is potentially relevant and should be discussed in more detail – evidence admitted.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 25 Sexton v Lowe [PDF, 174 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 25 Sexton v Lowe (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 10 March 2020) NATURE OF EMPLOYMENT – whether worker was an employee or a contractor – worker had already obtained a judgment from the Disputes Tribunal on the basis of being a contractor – claim against the company amounts to an abuse of process and cannot proceed – evidence pointed to a contracting relationship between the worker and Mr Lowe.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 24 CBA v ONM [PDF, 327 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 24 CBA v ONM (Costs Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 10 March 2020) COSTS –GUIDELINE SCALE – various steps discussed in depth – reduction of 30% made for partial success – Calderbank offer was reasonable to reject in the circumstances – the fact that the losing party was a large government organisation does not merit an increase to full scale costs.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 23 Rudling v Bridgestone New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 102 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 23 Rudling v Bridgestone New Zealand Ltd (Consent Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 9 March 2020) CONSENT – s 149 settlement agreement signed.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 21 A Labour Inspector v NewZealand Fusion International Ltd [PDF, 142 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 21 A Labour Inspector v NewZealand Fusion International Ltd (in administration) (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 3 March 2020) APPLICATION FOR STAY – incomplete information on financial circumstances – bankruptcy would not necessarily prevent rehearing application from proceeding – grounds for application are weak – stay not granted.