You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.

Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Search results

3630 items matching your search terms

  1. [2020] NZEmpC 222 Flashoff v New Zealand Technology Group Hawkes Bay Ltd [PDF, 311 KB]

    [2020] NZEmpC 222 Flashoff v New Zealand Technology Group Hawkes Bay Ltd (Reasons for Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 9 December 2020) REASONS FOR DISCHARGE ORDER AND CHALLENGE TO INTERIM INJUNUCTION BEING GRANTED – order was granted in earlier judgment – employment agreements were tied to commercial issues – commercial issues must be resolved in general jurisdiction – balance of convenience and interest of justice favour point against interim injunction and continuing freezing orders.

  2. [2020] NZEmpC 219 Ward v Concrete Structures (NZ) Ltd [PDF, 282 KB]

    [2020] NZEmpC 219 Ward v Concrete Structures (NZ) Ltd (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 4 December 2020) PERSONAL GRIEVANCE – UNJUSTIFIABLE DISMISSAL – dismissal is assessed objectively so employee can be dismissed without knowing it – employee was dismissed – dismissal was not justifiable - $30,000 awarded for compensation – employee’s lack of active mitigation viewed in context of mental health issues – 15 months of lost wages awarded – no reduction for contribution.

  3. [2020] NZEmpC 208 Wei v Sunlight JMB Future Ltd [PDF, 255 KB]

    [2020] NZEmpC 208 Wei v Sunlight JMB Future Ltd (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 30 November 2020) APPLICATION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION – challenge would not be nugatory if stay was not granted – challenge brought in good faith – company would be prejudiced by stay – application dismissed - APPLICATION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS – employee may not be able to pay future costs and has refused to pay the costs already ordered – security for costs ordered.

  4. [2020] NZEmpC 203 A Labour Inspector v Chhoir [PDF, 331 KB]

    [2020] NZEmpC 203 A Labour Inspector v Chhoir (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 23 November 2020) PENALTIES – QUANTUM – employer admitted serious breaches of minimum employment entitlements – whether statements made to Labour Inspector are admissible – inadmissibility was waived when documents were allowed into agreed summary of facts – employer faced language difficulties – equity and good conscience points toward not allowing statements – compensation order made – banning order inappropriate for first offence – $70,000 awarded in penalties.

  5. [2020] NZEmpC 202 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v NewZealand Fusion International Ltd [PDF, 213 KB]

    [2020] NZEmpC 202 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v NewZealand Fusion International Ltd (in administration) (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 19 November 2020) APPLICATION FOR CONSEQUENTIAL ORDERS – company is not able to pay compensation orders – requirements of s 142J are met – director to pay compensation order - APPLICATION FOR COSTS APPORTIONMENT – costs liability to be joint and several.

  6. [2020] NZEmpC 199 Canterbury Westland Kindergarten Assoc Inc v Barnes [PDF, 297 KB]

    [2020] NZEmpC 199 Canterbury Westland Kindergarten Assoc Inc v Barnes (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 19 November 2020) CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION – SICK LEAVE – whether employer had discretion over granting lengthy period of sick leave – sick leave can only be refused under limited circumstances – circumstances were not present here – sick leave awarded – COSTS IN THE AUTHORITY – costs awarded.