You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.

Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Search results

3609 items matching your search terms

  1. [2025] NZEmpC 48 Brown v The Clinician Holdings Ltd [PDF, 287 KB]

    [2025] NZEmpC 48 Brown v The Clinician Holdings Ltd (Judgment of Judge King, 17 March 2025) APPLICATION FOR DECLARATION OF EMPLOYMENT STATUS – worker performed part-time role as CFO for company under contractor agreement – parties negotiated for worker to work for TCHL on full-time basis as CFO – agreement provided worker would report to company’s CEO – parties agreed that worker would be paid $200,000 per year – parties discussed worker obtaining shareholding with company which induced worker, at least in part, to accept new arrangement – worker no longer permitted to sub-contract under new agreement – parties agreed that worker would wind down other contracting arrangements – new agreement superseded previous contractor agreement – parties never put their agreement into writing – worker continued to invoice company as no written agreement had been finalised – worker no longer sub-contracted work for company – worker continued to perform some work for other clients – worker was entitl…

  2. [2025] NZEmpC 47 NYF Ltd v Zhang [PDF, 196 KB]

    [2025] NZEmpC 47 NYF Ltd v Zhang (Judgment of Judge M King, 17 March 2025) DE NOVO CHALLENGE – COSTS – defendant partially successful in Authority and entitled to costs but on a reduced basis – insufficient information provided about settlement offers – parties both responsible for complexity of proceedings – second plaintiff not entitled to costs because their involvement in the proceedings was a result of their failures to provide employment agreement to defendant – engagement letter signed by defendant with representative is vague – defendant’s representative did not make submissions on meaning of engagement letter – reduction necessary as a result of terms of engagement letter – defendant’s representative cautioned from seeking to recover further costs from defendant – defendant’s representative encouraged to obtain legal advice on terms of engagement letter

  3. [2025] NZEmpC 46 LMN v STC [PDF, 173 KB]

    [2025] NZEmpC 46 LMN v STC (Interlocutory judgment (No 2) of Judge M King, 17 March 2025) EXTENSION OF TIME – SECURITY FOR COSTS – LEAVE TO FILE FURTHER SUBMISSIONS – UNLESS ORDERS – STRIKE-OUT – successful application for extension of time to pay security for costs order – timetabling orders set for payment of security for costs – proceedings not yet set down – unnecessary to grant leave to file further submissions – application for unless orders to strike out proceedings premature

  4. [2025] NZEmpC 45 FAJ v GEK & HIL [PDF, 201 KB]

    [2025] NZEmpC 45 FAJ v GEK & HIL (Judgment of Chief Judge Inglis, 14 March 2024) APPLICATION FOR FREEZING ORDER - urgency - application made without notice - good arguable case established for misuse of company funds - evidence of dishonest activity gives rise to risk of dissipation - interests of justice point to granting application - application granted - APPLICATION FOR ANCILLARY ORDERS - application appropriate in the interests of justice - application granted

  5. [2025] NZEmpC 44 Mutonhori v Wairoa District Council [PDF, 276 KB]

    [2025] NZEmpC 44 Mutonhori v Wairoa District Council (Judgment of Judge Holden, 14 March 2025) CATCHWORDS UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – removal of urgent duties appropriate in light of employee’s continued defiance – suspension due to adverse impacts on colleagues -- opportunity to respond provided – disadvantage justified – numerous substantial issues with employee’s behaviour – ample opportunities for employee to respond – dismissal justified

  6. [2025] NZEmpC 42 Soundhomes NZ Ltd v Doughty [PDF, 245 KB]

    [2025] NZEmpC 42 Soundhomes NZ Ltd v Doughty (Judgment (No 8) of Judge Beck, 13 March 2025) FREEZING ORDER – ANCILLARY ORDERS – VARIATION – EXTENSION – risk of dissipation of assets due to conduct of respondents – further information still required – parties dispute meaning of original freezing order – extent of order clarified – limited further ancillary orders made – freezing orders not to remain in place indefinitely – date for review set down

  7. [2025] NZEmpC 39 Alexander v Thorn [PDF, 185 KB]

    [2025] NZEmpC 39 Alexander v Thorn (Judgment of Judge M S King, 11 March 2025)EXTENSION OF TIME – NON DE NOVO CHALLENGE – GOOD FAITH – NON-PUBLICATION – order prohibiting search of court file due to irrelevant and potentially prejudicial information on Court file – no non-publication order made – both parties filed applications for leave to file a non de novo challenge out of time – no satisfactory explanation of lengthy delays – risk parties not wishing to pursue proceedings in good faith – merits of one issue strong for one party, but Authority likely not bound by finding for purposes of substantive investigation – both applications for extension of time unsuccessful

  8. [2025] NZEmpC 34  Xu v Pioneer Education and Immigration Services Group Ltd [PDF, 313 KB]

    [2025] NZEmpC 34  Xu v Pioneer Education and Immigration Services Group Ltd (Judgment of Judge Beck, 4 March 2025) CHALLENGE – NON DE NOVO – REMEDIES – MITIGATION – UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Authority found plaintiff was unjustifiably dismissed – plaintiff challenges remedies awarded in Authority – plaintiff made reasonable attempts to mitigate loss – plaintiff was not offered alternative employment by company – plaintiff entitled to six months’ lost remuneration – no entitlement to full compensation – plaintiff entitled to job search and medical costs – plaintiff suffered moderately serious and reasonably long lasting harm – plaintiff awarded $35,000 compensation – no interest awarded on awards – challenge largely successful

  9. [2025] NZEmpC 29 Carrington Resort Jade LP v Graham [PDF, 159 KB]

    [2025] NZEmpC 29 Carrington Resort Jade LP v Graham (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Judge M S King, 26 February 2025)  STRIKE-OUT – DISMISSAL FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION – plaintiff failed to comply with security for costs order – plaintiff no longer engaging with Court on proceedings – inordinate and inexcusable delay – delay has caused prejudice to defendant – proceedings have caused defendant stress – risk that costs of defence will render defendant’s success in Authority nugatory – challenge to be struck out if security for costs not paid within 14 days

  10. [2025] NZEmpC 28 IDEA Services Ltd v Wills [PDF, 328 KB]

    [2025] NZEmpC 28 IDEA Services Ltd v Wills (Judgment of Judge Beck, 24 February 2025) NON DE NOVO CHALLENGE – DISMISSAL PROCEDURE – REMEDIES – MITIGATION – VACCINATION – COVID-19 – employee performed administrative role – government COVID-19 vaccination mandate prevented employee from performing role in office – employer unwilling to allow employee to work at home – employee dismissed after not being vaccinated by deadline even though employer indicated further consultation would follow – employer justified in not allowing employee to perform role from home – dismissal substantively justified – employer required to consult on availability of roles for redeployment when considering whether to dismiss employee – employer failed to meet with employee after committing to do so – employer failed to provide information or engage about working from home – employer failed to consult with employee as individual employee – dismissal process insufficiently urgent to justify not consulting – emplo…