[2021] NZEmpC 216 VMR v Aviation Security Service (AvSec) division of Civil Aviation Authority (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 7 December 2021) OBJECTION TO ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE – interim reinstatement – evidence from GP concerning COVID vaccinations – some of evidence directly relevant and some of a contextual nature – evidence admissible.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3722 items matching your search terms
-
[2021] NZEmpC 216 VMR v Aviation Security Service (AvSec) division of Civil Aviation Authority [PDF, 204 KB] -
[2021] NZEmpC 215 Stewart v AFFCO NZ Ltd [PDF, 318 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 215 Stewart v AFFCO NZ Ltd (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 7 December 2021) INJUNCTION – LOCKOUT – company required employee to sign new individual employment agreement or join union and go on collective employment agreement – employee not allowed to continue work – permanent employee – lockout unlawful – seasonal worker.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 214 McDonnell v The Board of Trustees of Te Manawa O Tuhoe Trust [PDF, 273 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 214 McDonnell v The Board of Trustees of Te Manawa O Tuhoe Trust (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 2 December 2021) APPLICATION FOR INTERIM REINSTATEMENT – arguable case for unjustifiable dismissal – arguable case that permanent reinstatement would be practicable and reasonable – balance of convenience favours interim reinstatement – application granted.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 213 Baylis v Chief Executive of the Porirua City Council [PDF, 191 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 213 Baylis v Chief Executive of the Porirua City Council (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 1 December 2021) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE CHALLENGE – short delay in first attempt to file statement of claim – lack of fault by applicant – lack of prejudice – in interests of justice to allow applicant to bring challenge – application granted.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 212 Alkazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd [PDF, 165 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 212 Alkazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 1 December 2021) APPLICATION FOR RECALL – no grounds for recall – application declined.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 211 McKinlay v Wellington Cosmetic Clinic Ltd [PDF, 203 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 211 McKinlay v Wellington Cosmetic Clinic Ltd (Costs Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 29 November 2021) COSTS – legal aid – costs awarded.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 207 Martin v Solar Bright Ltd (in liquidation) [PDF, 227 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 207 Martin v Solar Bright Ltd (in liquidation) (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 26 November 2021) APPLICATION FOR REHEARING – no grounds for rehearing – application declined.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 210 Damerell Group Property Management Ltd v Baxter [PDF, 140 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 210 Damerell Group Property Management Ltd v Baxter (Consent Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 25 November 2021) NATURE OF EMPLOYMENT – consent.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 209 Guan v JAY.CO Ltd [PDF, 169 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 209 Guan v JAY.CO Ltd (Costs Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 25 November 2021) APPLICATION FOR COSTS – actual costs lower than guideline scale – contribution to reasonable costs awarded.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 208 ABC v DEF [PDF, 315 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 208 ABC v DEF (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 25 November 2021) DE NOVO CHALLENGE – notice of direction to mediation – notice of direction was a determination – matter about procedure – not impracticable or inappropriate for mediation to take place – ss 159 and 179(5) Employment Relations Act 2000 – NON-PUBLICATION –interim order of non-publication.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 206 E Tu Inc v Carter Holt Harvey LVL Ltd [PDF, 189 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 206 E Tu Inc v Carter Holt Harvey LVL Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 23 November 2021) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR AS INTERVENER – proceedings raised issue of considerable public importance – parties do not object – application granted.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 205 WXN v Auckland International Airport Ltd [PDF, 455 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 205 WXN v Auckland International Airport Ltd (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 23 November 2021) DE NOVO CHALLENGE – interim reinstatement – unvaccinated airport worker – arguable case – balance of convenience and overall justice favoured plaintiff in the unusual circumstances of the case – interim reinstatement granted on conditions – challenge allowed.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 204 Ling v Super Cuisine Group Ltd [PDF, 200 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 204 Ling v Super Cuisine Group Ltd (Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 23 November 2021) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE A CHALLENGE – application was out of time because of error by representative – no prejudice to respondent – application granted.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 203 Courage v Attorney-General [PDF, 138 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 203 Courage v Attorney-General (Consent Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 22 November 2021) APPLICATION FOR DISCOVERY AGAINST NON-PARTY – consent.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 202 Orora Packaging Ltd v E Tu Inc [PDF, 203 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 202 Orora Packaging Ltd v E Tu Inc (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 19 November 2021) APPLICATION TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE – parts of evidence that are irrelevant or opinion removed.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 200 Best Health Foods Ltd v Zhou [PDF, 226 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 200 Best Health Foods Ltd v Zhou (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 19 November 2021) REMEDIES – UNJUSTIFIABLE DISMISSAL – non-de novo challenge to remedies awarded by the Authority - Authority did not make an error of fact or law when determining remedies - challenge dismissed.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 201 Cronin-Lampe v Board of Trustees of Melville High School [PDF, 269 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 201 Cronin-Lampe v Board of Trustees of Melville High School (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 18 November 2021) JURISDICTION – ACCIDENT COMPENSATION – whether personal grievances can be brought after failed application to ACC – other claims can be brought if ACC cover is declined and that decision is accepted by applicant – Employment Court has jurisdiction to consider personal grievances.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 199 Lawton v Steel Pencil Holdings Ltd [PDF, 415 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 199 Lawton v Steel Pencil Holdings Ltd (in liquidation) (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 18 November 2021) WAGE ARREARS – an individual can be liable under s 142Y even if the company has gone into liquidation – agreement between the parties settled all matters and prevents further wage arrears claims – holiday pay was still owing under the agreement – holiday pay awarded.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 198 Head v Chief Executive of the Inland Revenue Department [PDF, 388 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 198 Head v Chief Executive of the Inland Revenue Department (Costs Judgment of the full Court, 17 November 2021) COSTS – applications for costs by first and second defendants – first defendant sought two-thirds of actual and reasonable costs – second defendant sought guideline scale – HELD – complex proceeding – several interlocutory judgments – guideline scale did not recognise sufficiently the significant attendances – degree of importance associated with the proceeding but not a test case – two-thirds of actual and reasonable costs awarded to first defendant with deductions to recognise access to justice, matter of importance, overlap – scale costs awarded to second defendant with deduction to recognise overlap – applications granted.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 197 Mikes Transport Warehouse Ltd v Vermuelen [PDF, 245 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 197 Mikes Transport Warehouse Ltd v Vermuelen (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 17 November 2021) PERSONAL GRIEVANCE – UNJUSTIFIABLE DISMISSAL – employee unequivocally resigned – a “cooling off” period is not required for an unequivocal resignation – employee was not unjustifiably dismissed from Mikes Transport Warehouse – not assisting employee with visa issues in role with related company was unjustifiable – employee was unjustifiably dismissed – remedies awarded.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 196 KAQ v The Attorney-General [PDF, 245 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 196 KAQ v The Attorney-General (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 12 November 2021) APPLICATION FOR ACCESS TO COURT DOCUMENTS – material contains personal and sensitive information – plaintiff was a minor – proceedings were discontinued so claims are untested – limited access granted.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 195 KAQ v The Attorney-General [PDF, 185 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 195 KAQ v The Attorney-General (Interlocutory Judgment (No 3) of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 10 November 2021) APPLICATION FOR NON-PUBLICATION ORDER – publication generally has detrimental impact on future employment – plaintiff is a minor – plaintiff’s name has appeared in previous cases but the horse has not yet bolted – permanent non-publication granted.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 194 Henry v South Waikato Achievement Trust [PDF, 152 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 194 Henry v South Waikato Achievement Trust (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 8 November 2021) APPLICATION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION OF COSTS DETERMINATION – challenge filed to both substantive and costs determination – application granted, by consent.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 193 Williams v Metallic Sweeping (1998) Ltd [PDF, 142 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 193 Williams v Metallic Sweeping (1998) Ltd (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 8 November 2021) COSTS – discontinuance of challenge and application for leave to challenge costs determination out of time – costs awarded, by consent.
-
[2021] NZEmpC 192 AB Roofing Ltd v Lane [PDF, 182 KB] [2021] NZEmpC 192 AB Roofing Ltd v Lane (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 4 November 2021) APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT CHALLENGE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION – significant non-compliance with Court’s directions – no constructive attempt to prosecute claim – application granted.