From 3 June 2025 the Employment Court will start publishing its judgments from 24 hours after the delivery date, or the next business day, unless otherwise directed by a judge. Decisions of public interest may be published earlier, as directed by a judge.

You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.

Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Search results

3871 items matching your search terms

  1. [2025] NZEmpC 253 Fuimaono v Ritchies Murphy Transport Solutions Limited [PDF, 177 KB]

    [2025] NZEmpC 253 Fuimaono v Ritchies Murphy Transport Solutions Limited (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Judge M S King, 28 November 2025) APPLICATION FOR ACCESS TO COURT DOCUMENTS – privacy interests have greater weight before substantive hearing – footage sought would affect privacy interests of plaintiff and third parties – interests of justice point away from granting access – application declined.

  2. [2025] NZEmpC 247 NN v Fire and Emergency New Zealand (judgment of Judge JC Holden 21 November 2025) [PDF, 198 KB]

    [2025] NZEmpC 247  NN v Fire and Emergency New Zealand  (judgment of Judge JC Holden 21 November 2025) NON-DE NOVO CHALLENGE – PRELIMINARY ISSUE – whether ER Act requires review of appointments process under FENZ Act to be completed before employment commences – not a requirement of the legislation – FENZ bound to give effect to the statutory review process –plaintiff began work and is entitled to bring a dismissal grievance – substantive and procedural justification to be considered in the context of the review process

  3. [2025] NZEmpC [2025] NZEmpc 241 Jenner v Corrections Assoc of New Zealand Inc (No 2) [PDF, 468 KB]

    [2025] NZEmpC [2025] NZEmpc 241 Jenner v Corrections Assoc of New Zealand Inc (No 2) (Judgment of Judge Beck, 7 November 2025) APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW – union constitution allows for removal from office for just cause ­– executive committee of the union proposed to remove vice president from office for just cause ­– proposed actions of union justiciable– proposal to remove applicant not a preliminary or investigatory process – proposed actions amenable to judicial review where breach of natural justice and errors of law alleged – dispute over interpretation of just cause ­– democratic structure of union and statutory purpose consistent with just cause being a high threshold for removal – just cause must be consistent with rights and freedoms contained in NZBORA – union interpretation of just cause was an error in law– correct interpretation of constitution does not permit union to unilaterally determine just cause –breaches of natural justice in relation to notice cured by lega…

  4. 2025] NZEmpC 236 Smart Sushi Northwest Limited and other(s) v A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment [PDF, 284 KB]

    2025] NZEmpC 236 Smart Sushi Northwest Limited and other(s) v A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment (Judgment of Judge M S King, 31 October 2025) NON-DE NOVO CHALLENGE – MINIMUM ENTITLEMENTS – HOLIDAY PAY - OBJECTION TO IMPROVEMENT NOTICE - employer incorrectly paid annual leave and alternative holiday leave –practice of paying out all annual holiday leave and alternative holidays in advance – improvement notices issued to remedy breaches - employer seeks set off or credit for previous payments for the purposes of remediation –set off not available for previously made incorrect payments – previous payments made without agreement and in breach of the Holidays Act 2003 – previous payments extinguished employees’ entitlement to paid holiday leave and alternative holidays -  incorrect payments do not discharge an employer’s obligation to fulfil minimum entitlements in full – concerns of double payment and windfall mitigated by employers ability to bring c…

  5. [2025] NZEmpC 233 Corrections Association of New Zealand Inc v Jenner [PDF, 209 KB]

    [2025] NZEmpC 233 Corrections Association of New Zealand Inc v Jenner (Interlocutory judgment of Judge Beck, 31 October 2025) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FURTHER SUBMISSIONS – submissions the respondent seeks to introduce are not new – sufficient opportunity given to present submissions – no exceptional circumstances identified – overall justice does not support application being granted – application denied.

  6. [2025] NZEmpC 231 DSJ Joinery Limited v Da Silva [PDF, 203 KB]

    [2025] NZEmpC 231 DSJ Joinery Limited v Da Silva (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge Inglis, 29 October 2025) APPLICATION FOR STAY – no evidence that defendant would be unable to repay remedies if challenge is successful – application declined – APPLICATION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS – whether Employment Court has jurisdiction to order security for costs if there is no order of stay – Employment Court Regulations only expressly provide for security for costs where stay is ordered – reading in a power to award security for costs may go against statutory purpose – no evidence of impecuniosity  – application declined

  7. [2025] NZEmpC  223 McGearty v Air New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 387 KB]

    [2025] NZEmpC  223 McGearty v Air New Zealand Ltd (Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 14 October 2025) DE NOVO CHALLENGE – UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – DISCRIMINATION – AGE DISCRIMINATION – employee subject to international age restrictions as a pilot – age restriction considered a genuine occupational qualification – collective agreement provided options upon reaching age threshold – employee unable to continue as captain on the B777 – disadvantage and discrimination claimed – collective agreement required employer to make inquiry – employer failed to inquire and placed employee on leave without pay – unjustified disadvantage grievance established – employer failed to make reasonable adjustments to enable employee to continue flying as captain on B777 – adjustments would not have caused unreasonable disruption – individual human rights diverged from collective interest – legal compliance with anti-discrimination obligations is paramount – employee not estopped from bringing personal grieva…