From 3 June 2025 the Employment Court will start publishing its judgments from 24 hours after the delivery date, or the next business day, unless otherwise directed by a judge. Decisions of public interest may be published earlier, as directed by a judge.

You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.

Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Search results

3845 items matching your search terms

  1. [2024] NZEmpC 104 Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand v New Zealand Nurses Organisation Inc [PDF, 304 KB]

    [2024] NZEmpC 104 Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand v New Zealand Nurses Organisation Inc (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 13 June 2024) APPLICATION FOR  STRIKE OUT – legality of strike notice is moot because strike already occurred – no reason to exercise discretion to consider application despite mootness – proceedings struck out - APPLICATION FOR JOINDER – no joinder required because proceedings are struck out.

  2. [2024] NZEmpC 103 Carrington Resort Jade LP v Maheno (Interlocutory Judgment [PDF, 231 KB]

    [2024] NZEmpC 103 Carrington Resort Jade LP v Maheno (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge M S King, 13 June 2024) APPLICATION FOR STAY – no jurisdiction or basis for a stay – APPLICATION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS – concern that costs would not be able to be paid – security for costs ordered – GOOD FAITH REPORT – plaintiff failed to participate in Authority investigation – parameters of de novo challenge restricted.

  3. [2024] NZEmpC 93 Television New Zealand Ltd v E Tū Incorporated [PDF, 327 KB]

    [2024] NZEmpC 93 Television New Zealand Ltd v E Tū Incorporated (Judgment of Chief Judge Inglis, 31 May 2024) Catchwords: INTERPRETATION OF COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT – REDUNDANCY – collective agreement requires participation with union members beyond normal good faith consultation – employer did not comply with requirement to involve union members at developmental stage of decision making process – compliance order is appropriate in the circumstances – compliance order made.

  4. [2024] NZEmpC 91 (Judgment (No 6) of Judge M S King 28 May 2024) [PDF, 323 KB]

    [2024] NZEmpC 91 (Judgment (No 6) of Judge M S King 28 May 2024) APPLICATION TO DISCHARGE FREEZING AND ANCILLARY ORDERS – APPLICATION TO VARY FREEZING ORDER  - applicant has a good arguable case – evidence defendant misappropriated funds during employment –defendant failed to disclose business interests and dealings – real risk of dissipation of assets – freezing orders not to continue indefinitely – the interests of justice favour the extension of the freezing order – freezing order extended – application by defendant to vary freezing order declined.  

  5. [2024] NZEmpC 85 Pacific Insulation Ltd v Lagera & Anor [PDF, 182 KB]

    [2024] NZEmpC 85 Pacific Insulation Ltd v Lagera & Anor (Reasons judgment of Judge JC Holden 21 May 2024) APPLICATION FOR FREEZING AND ANCILLARY ORDERS – good arguable case based on steps the respondents have taken to divert business from the applicant – assets within New Zealand – real risk that assets will be dissipated or moved overseas – balance of convenience and interests of justice favour orders being made – appropriate to accord application urgency and to proceed without notice – application granted.