[2024] NZEmpC 91 (Judgment (No 6) of Judge M S King 28 May 2024) APPLICATION TO DISCHARGE FREEZING AND ANCILLARY ORDERS – APPLICATION TO VARY FREEZING ORDER - applicant has a good arguable case – evidence defendant misappropriated funds during employment –defendant failed to disclose business interests and dealings – real risk of dissipation of assets – freezing orders not to continue indefinitely – the interests of justice favour the extension of the freezing order – freezing order extended – application by defendant to vary freezing order declined.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3768 items matching your search terms
-
[2024] NZEmpC 91 (Judgment (No 6) of Judge M S King 28 May 2024) [PDF, 323 KB] -
[2024] NZEmpC 90 Pacific Insulation Ltd v Lagera & Anor [PDF, 159 KB] [2024] NZEmpC 90 Pacific Insulation Ltd v Lagera & Anor (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge J C Holden 27 May 2024) APPLICATION TO VARY FREEZING ORDERS – varied by consent.
-
[2024] NZEmpC 89 Taia v Ake Innovation Ltd [PDF, 177 KB] 2024] NZEmpC 89 Taia v Ake Innovation Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 27 May 2024) APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A STATEMENT OF DEFENCE – interests of justice favour granting extension – extension granted.
-
[2024] NZEmpC 88 Henderson Travels Ltd v Kaur [PDF, 232 KB] [2024] NZEmpC 88 Henderson Travels Ltd (in liq) v Kaur (Interlocutory Judgment (No 3) of Judge K G Smith, 24 May 2024) APPLICATION TO JOIN PARTY FOR COSTS PURPOSES – company director promised related company could be liable for costs – related company joined for costs.
-
[2024] NZEmpC 87 Hadfield v Atlas Concrete Judgment [PDF, 168 KB] [2024] NZEmpC 87 Hadfield v Atlas Concrete Ltd (Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 23 May 2024) APPLICATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE CHALLENGE - delay was a result of procedural hiccup - no prejudice to respondent - application granted.
-
[2024] NZEmpC 85 Pacific Insulation Ltd v Lagera & Anor [PDF, 182 KB] [2024] NZEmpC 85 Pacific Insulation Ltd v Lagera & Anor (Reasons judgment of Judge JC Holden 21 May 2024) APPLICATION FOR FREEZING AND ANCILLARY ORDERS – good arguable case based on steps the respondents have taken to divert business from the applicant – assets within New Zealand – real risk that assets will be dissipated or moved overseas – balance of convenience and interests of justice favour orders being made – appropriate to accord application urgency and to proceed without notice – application granted.
-
[2024] NZEmpC 84 E Tū Inc v Singh [PDF, 378 KB] [2024] NZEmpC 84 Singh v E Tū Inc (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 21 May 2024) PERSONAL GRIEVANCE – UNJUSTIFIABLE DISMISSAL – disciplinary process was rushed – reasons for dismissal were unclear – identity of decision maker was unclear – employee did not have adequate opportunity to respond – dismissal was unjustifiable – compensation awarded – lost wages awarded – no reduction for contribution.
-
[2024] NZEmpC 86 Chief of the New Zealand Defence Force v YFX [PDF, 144 KB] [2024] NZEmpC 86 Chief of the New Zealand Defence Force v YFX (Consent Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 21 May 2024) CONSENT.
-
[2024] NZEmpC 83 Caisteal An Ime Ltd v A Labour Inspector Costs. [PDF, 224 KB] [2024] NZEmpC 83 Caisteal An Ime Ltd v A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (Costs Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 20 May 2024) COSTS – GUIDELINE SCALE – in-house counsel – employed lawyer exception – costs awarded.
-
[2024] NZEmpC 82 Pacific Insulation Ltd v Lagera & Anor [PDF, 115 KB] [2024] NZEmpC 82 Pacific Insulation Ltd v Lagera & Anor (Judgment of Judge J C Holden 17 May 2024) FREEZING ORDERS – ANCILLARY ORDERS – freezing and ancillary orders granted on an urgent and without notice basis – reasons to follow
-
[2024] NZEmpC 81 Joo v Hospitality Services Ltd Consent [PDF, 137 KB] [2024] NZEmpC 81 Joo v Hospitality Services Ltd (Consent Judgment of Judge M S King, 16 May 2024) CONSENT.
-
[2024] NZEmpC 80 Glenfield College BOT v Anderson Interlocutory No 2 Judgment. [PDF, 174 KB] [2024] NZEmpC 80 Glenfield College Board of Trustees v Anderson (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 16 May 2024) APPLICATIONS TO JOIN PARTIES - parties are affected by interpretation of clause - applications not opposed - applications granted.
-
[2024] NZEmpC 79 Spring 2017 Ltd vTaifau Judgment. [PDF, 177 KB] [2024] NZEmpC 79 Spring 2017 Ltd v Taifau (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 15 May 2024) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE CHALLENGE – delay was lengthy – explanation for delay was not reasonable – application declined.
-
[2024] NZEmpC 78 Manuka Health NZ Ltd v Kalic Stay [PDF, 170 KB] [2024] NZEmpC 78 Manuka Health New Zealand Ltd v Kalic (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 15 May 2024) APPLICATION FOR INTERIM INJUNCTION – reasonable chance of success in judicial review – application granted.
-
[2024] NZEmpC 77 (Judgment (No 6) of Judge M S King 14 May 2024) [PDF, 141 KB] [2024] NZEmpC 77 (Judgment (No 6) of Judge M S King 14 May 2024) APPLICATION TO DISCHARGE FREEZING ORDER –freezing order extended - application to discharge freezing order declined - reasons to follow.
-
[2024] NZEmpC 76 Al-Bustanji and Jenner v Corrections Association of New Zealand Inc [PDF, 257 KB] [2024] NZEmpC 76 Al-Bustani v Corrections Assoc of New Zealand Inc (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 13 May 2024)
-
[2024] NZEmpC 75 Opai v Commissioner of Police [PDF, 161 KB] [2024] NZEmpC 75 Opai v Commissioner of Police (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 13 May 2024) APPLICATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE CHALLENGE - application not opposed - application granted.
-
[2024] NZEmpC 74 Hu v Passion Fresh Ltd [PDF, 273 KB] [2024] NZEmpC 74 Hu v Passsion Fresh Ltd (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 13 May 2024) PERSONAL GRIEVANCE – RAISING THE GRIEVANCE – grievance was not raised with correct employer within 90 days – email indirectly sent to employer was not sufficient to raise a grievance – personal grievance cannot be investigated.
-
[2024] NZEmpC 73 MGE New Zealand 2010 Limited & McKay Ltd v Campbell Judgment No-3 [PDF, 146 KB] [2024] NZEmpC 73 MGE New Zealand 2010 Limited & McKay Ltd v Campbell (Judgment No 3 Judgment of Judge King) 10 May 2024) CONSENT - SEARCH ORDER VARIED BY CONSENT
-
[2024] NZEmpC 70 Roberts v The Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections Interlocutory (No 2) [PDF, 183 KB] [2024] NZEmpC 70 Roberts v The Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Judge Kathryn Beck, 7 May 2024) APPLICATION TO JOIN A PARTY – union is affected by proceeding – application granted.
-
[2024] NZEmpC 69 Magnum Hire Ltd v Parker [PDF, 224 KB] [2024] NZEmpC 69 Magnum Hire Ltd v Parker (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 6 May 2024) APPLICATION FOR STAY - challenge would not be rendered ineffectual if stay is not granted – no evidence of lack of good faith – stay would negatively affect successful party – interests of justice point against granting stay – application declined.
-
[2024] NZEmpC 68 Stonewood Group Ltd v VGP [PDF, 172 KB] [2024] NZEmpC 68 Stonewood Group Ltd v VGP (Costs Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 2 May 2024) COSTS – GUIDELINE SCALE – uplift for lack of GST registration – costs awarded.
-
[2024] NZEmpC 67 Roberts v The Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections [PDF, 191 KB] [2024] NZEmpC 67 Roberts v The Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections (Costs Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 2 May 2024) COSTS – GUIDELINE SCALE – no reason to order uplift – costs awarded.
-
[2024] NZEmpC 66 Labour Inspector v Airways Corp of NZ [PDF, 112 KB] [2024] NZEmpC 66 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v Airways Corp of New Zealand Ltd (Consent Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 30 April 2024) CONSENT.
-
[2024] NZEmpC 65 KN v New Zealand Steel Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) [PDF, 178 KB] [2024] NZEmpC 65 KN v New Zealand Steel Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Judge Kathryn Beck, 26 April 2024)APPLICATION FOR NON-PUBLICATION ORDERS – applicant has family members with medical conditions that would be exacerbated by publication – specific adverse consequence identified – application granted.