[2016] NZEmpC 65 Caffe Coffee (NZ) Ltd v Farrimond (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 2 June 2016)BREACH OF CONTRACT – USE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION – PENALTY – whether preparatory steps in setting up a new business were legitimate – whether defendant concerned in a business – employee duty to report to employer – whether confidential information used in new business – duty of fidelity – duty of good faith – contract interpretation – causation and damages.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3751 items matching your search terms
-
[2016] NZEmpC 65 Caffe Coffee (NZ) Ltd v Farrimond [PDF, 418 KB] -
[2016] NZEmpC 64 McIvor v Saad [PDF, 95 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 64 McIvor v Saad (Oral Judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 30 May 2016) STAY – COMPLIANCE – SECURITY FOR COSTS – reasons for declining adjournment given – stay of execution of Court’s judgment pending outcome of application for leave to appeal to Court of Appeal granted on conditions – application for compliance adjourned – no orders for security for costs – costs of $750 awarded.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 62 Harlow v Western Property Management Ltd [PDF, 100 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 62 Harlow v Western Property Management Ltd
-
[2016] NZEmpC 60 Eden Group Ltd v Jackson [PDF, 178 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 60 Eden Group Ltd v Jackson (Reasons for Judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 24 May 2016) APPLICATION FOR FREEZING AND SEARCH ORDERS – REASONS – arguable case for breach of terms of employment agreement – evidence of deceptive establishment of means to set up in competition with employer while still in its employ – evidence of covert and potentially fraudulent collective preparation of first three respondents over lengthy warranted granting of both orders.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 58 Eden Group Ltd v Jackson [PDF, 68 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 58 Eden Group Ltd v Jackson (Oral Judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 23 May 2016) APPLICATION FOR FREEZING ORDERS – urgent and without notice – granted
-
[2016] NZEmpC 54 H v A Ltd [PDF, 250 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 54 H v A Ltd (Judgment of Judge Corkill, 10 May 2016) CHALLENGE TO SUSPENSION – DISADVANTAGE GRIEVANCES –Court’s order for reinstatement did not preclude employer from right to investigate further allegations – whether actions complied with CEA – contract interpretation principles considered and applied – no breach of CEA – no breach of good faith – significant procedural flaws in decision to suspend but suspension was not breach of order to reinstate – compensation of $6,000 awarded – parties to confer on lost remuneration.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 53 Mana Coach Services Ltd v The NZ Tramways and Public Transport Employees Union Inc [PDF, 93 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 53 Mana Coach Services Ltd v The New Zealand Tramways and Public Passenger Transport Union Inc (Costs Judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan, 9 May 2016) COSTS – mixed success of both parties throughout litigation – important to consider future relationship between parties which Court has role to assist – no order for costs.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 32 Bhikoo v Stephen Marr Hair Design Newmarket Limited [PDF, 239 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 32 Bhikoo v Stephen Marr Hair Design Newmarket Limited (Judgment of Judge Perkins of 6 April 2016) UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – whether two of grounds for dismissal amounted to serious misconduct – test for serious misconduct considered – plaintiff’s refusal to participate in disciplinary process a factor – difficulties with claim for penalty – consideration of ss 63A and 64.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 49 Mercer v McIntyre [PDF, 151 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 49 Mercer v McIntyre(Judgment of Judge Ford, 4 May 2016) INTERPRETATION OF PROVISION IN SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT – dispute over application of “plus interest of 10%” – contract interpretation principles applied – contra proferens discussed – challenge unsuccessful.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 50 NZ Nurses Org & Anor v Waikato District Health Board [PDF, 249 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 50 NZ Nurses Org & Anor v Waikato District Health Board (Judgment of Judge Ford, 4 May 2016) RETIRMENT GRATUITY – CONTRACT INTERPRETATION – challenge and cross-challenge – whether defendant qualified for redundancy gratuity – relationship between collective agreement and contract considered – may be test case with regard to costs – intervener to meet own costs.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 51 Stewart t/a Loughnans v Richardson [PDF, 12 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 51 Stewart t/a Loughnans v Richardson - consent judgment of Judge Corkill (Consent Judgment of Judge Corkill, 4 May 2016) CONSENT – each party acknowledged other had acted in good faith – settlement terms confidential
-
[2016] NZEmpC 52 Industrial Equipment Distributors Lifting Centre Ltd v Spark NZ Ltd [PDF, 63 KB] Industrial Equipment Distributors Lifting Centre Ltd v Spark NZ Ltd - judgment No 2 of Judge B A Corkill. (Judgment No 2 of Judge Corkill, 4 May 2016) DISCLOSURE – application for disclosure by third parties – to be read in conjunction with judgment [2016] NZEmpC 45 – orders made for disclosure by first respondent.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 48 Nelson v Katavich [PDF, 290 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 48 Nelson v Katavich [PDF, 290 KB] (Judgment of Judge Ford, 3 May 2016) UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - IDENTITY OF EMPLOYER – employer was company, not individual – unjustified dismissal challenge upheld – misconduct allegations included some fictitious allegations - protracted post-dismissal threats and actions designed to coerce plaintiff into abandoning claim - plaintiff awarded arrears of wages, holiday pay and lost remuneration, plus $30,000 compensation.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 45 Industrial Equipment Distributors Lifting Centre Ltd v Spark NZ Ltd [PDF, 131 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 45 Industrial Equipment Distributors Lifting Centre Ltd v Spark NZ Ltd & Vodafone(Judgment of Judge Corkill, 2 May 2016) DISCLOSURE – application for disclosure by third parties - evidence of improper remote access to plaintiff’s web-based system – need to confirm identity attached to IP addresses -second respondent properly served –– consideration of conditions necessary before orders for third party discovery made – application allowed.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 46 Ngawharau v Porirua Whanau Centre [PDF, 72 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 46 Ngawharau v Porirua Whanau Centre (Costs Judgment of Judge Ford, 2 May 2016) COSTS – standard principles applied – $9072 in costs awarded to plaintiff.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 47 Gather Supermarket Chain Ltd t/a Italia Square v Faulls [PDF, 80 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 47 Gather Supermarket Chain Ltd t/a Italia Square v Faulls (Judgment of Chief Judge Colgan, 2 May 2016) DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION – plaintiff’s challenge struck out - now open to defendant to enforce her determination in the Authority.
-
[2016] NZCA 137 CA629/2015 Lean Meats Oamaru Limited v New Zealand Meat Workers Related Trades Union Inc [PDF, 78 KB] The application for leave to appeal against the judgment of the Employment Court in Lean Meats Oamaru Ltd v New Zealand Meat Workers & Related Union Inc is granted, no order as to costs,19 April 2016.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 43 Pretorius v Marra Construction (2004) Ltd [PDF, 159 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 43 Pretorius v Marra Construction (2004) Ltd (Judgment of Judge Corkill, 19 April 2016) APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL – under s 178, application to remove part of a matter before Authority – parts of claims already subject of challenge at Court – unjustified dismissal and other remuneration grievances still before Authority – application declined.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 44 G L Freeman Holdings Ltd v Belley (Labour Inspector) [PDF, 172 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 44 G L Freeman Holdings Ltd v Belley (Labour Inspector) (Costs Judgment of Judge Corkill, 19 April 2016) COSTS – DISCONTINUANCE - application for discontinuance filed by plaintiff – no response to defendant’s application for costs – costs of in-house counsel - $580 costs awarded against plaintiff
-
[2016] NZEmpC 39 Fox v Hereworth School Trust Board Costs [PDF, 281 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 39 Fox v Hereworth School Trust Board Costs (Costs judgment of Chief Judge GL Colgan of 15 April 2016) COSTS – INSTALMENTS – three separate costs periods identified – arguments for and against payments by instalment considered – Court’s equity and good conscience jurisdiction applied – plaintiff’s lack of success on some interlocutory matter and rejection of Calderbank taken into account – total of $96, 482.03 awarded, to be paid by instalment.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 41 Davidson v Kelly second judgment [PDF, 68 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 41 Davidson v Kelly no.2 judgment (Consent judgment no 2 of Judge Corkill of 15 April 2016.) COMPLIANCE ORDER – plaintiff put forward no basis to resist enforcement steps.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 40 Burns V Randwick Meat Co Limited consent [PDF, 13 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 40 Burns V Randwick Meat Co Limited consent judgment (Judgment of Judge Corkill of 15 April 2016 ) CONSENT – terms of settlement subject to confidential agreement – order of non-publication
-
[2016] NZEmpC 42 ITE v ALA [PDF, 233 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 42 ITE v ALA Judgement of Judge Christina Inglis (Judgment of Judge Christina Inglis, 15 April 2016) BREACH OF CONFIDENTIALITY OBLIGATIONS – clear unambiguous clauses in settlement agreement – webpage, video and emails breached agreement – deliberate sustained breaches justifying penalty of $6,000 – compliance orders issued – permanent non-publication orders granted – indemnity costs awarded as per contractual agreement.
-
[2016] NZEmpC 37 Zespri International Limited v Yu third Interlocutory [PDF, 100 KB] [2016] NZEmpC 37 Zespri International Limited v Yu Interlocutory No 3 (Interlocutory Judgment number 3 of Chief Judge Colgan of 15 April 2016) KEY SEARCH TERMS – two categories of documents, personal and privileged – key words specified for purpose of expert search – parties to confer on request for combination search
-
[2016] NZCA 126 CA658/2015 The Commissioner of Salford School v Campbell [PDF, 125 KB] The application for leave dismissed, costs ordered, 14 April 2016.